Search

Objective: the optimal management of asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas is not well defined. The aim of this study is to compare the imaging and clinical outcomes of patients with asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas managed either with upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or active surveillance. Methods: this retrospective, multicenter study involved patients with asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas. The study end-points included local tumor control and the development of new neurological deficits attributable to the tumor. Factors associated with tumor progression and neurological morbidity were also analyzed. Results: the combined unmatched cohort included 417 patients. Following propensity score matching for age, tumor volume, and follow-up 110 patients remained in each cohort. Tumor control was achieved in 98.2% and 61.8% of the SRS and active surveillance cohorts, respectively. SRS was associated with superior local tumor control (p < 0.001, HR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.002-0.13) compared to active surveillance. Three patients (2.7%) in the SRS cohort and six (5.5%) in the active surveillance cohort exhibited neurological deterioration. One (0.9%) patient in the SRS-treated and 11 (10%) patients in the active surveillance cohort required surgical management of their meningioma during follow-up. Conclusions: SRS is associated with superior local control of asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas as compared to active surveillance and does so with low morbidity rates. SRS should be offered as an alternative to active surveillance as the initial management of asymptomatic skull base meningiomas. Active surveillance policies do not currently specify the optimal time to intervention when meningioma growth is noted. Our results indicate that if active surveillance is the initial management of choice, SRS should be recommended when radiologic tumor progression is noted and prior to clinical progression., NA

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is frequently used for Cushing's disease (CD) after failed pituitary surgery. Management of patients with persistent CD after failed SRS is complex, as the alternative therapeutic options harbor significant risks. The outcomes of repeat pituitary radiosurgery, however, have not been described. We sought to determine the outcomes of repeat SRS in patients with CD. We pooled data from five institutions participating in the International Gamma Knife Research Foundation for patients with recurrent or persistent CD ≥ 12 months after initial SRS. Patients were included in the study if they had ≥ 6 months endocrine follow-up after repeat SRS. Twenty patients were included in the study. Repeat single-session SRS was performed 1.3-9.7 years after initial SRS. Median endocrine follow-up was 6.6 years (1.4-19.1 years). Median margin dose was 20 Gy (range 10.8-35 Gy). Endocrine remission after second SRS was noted in 12 patients (60%), with a median time to remission of 6 months (range 2-64 months). Biochemical recurrence occurred in two patients (17%) after initial remission. Overall, the cumulative rates of durable endocrine remission at 5 and 10 years were 47 and 53%, respectively. Two patients (10%) experienced adverse radiation effects, including transient visual loss and permanent diplopia. Repeat SRS achieves lasting biochemical remission in approximately half of patients with CD refractory to both prior microsurgery and SRS. Because of the morbidity of refractory or recurrent CD, repeat SRS should be considered for carefully selected patients with hypercortisolism confirmed one or more years after initial SRS.