Search

The regulation of chromatin biology ultimately depends on the manipulation of its smallest subunit, the nucleosome. The proteins that bind and operate on the nucleosome do so, while their substrate is part of a polymer embedded in the dense nuclear environment. Their molecular interactions must in some way be tuned to deal with this complexity. Due to the rapid increase in the number of high-resolution structures of nucleosome-protein complexes and the increasing understanding of the cellular chromatin structure, it is starting to become clearer how chromatin factors operate in this complex environment. In this review, we analyze the current literature on the interplay between nucleosome-protein interactions and higher-order chromatin structure. We examine in what way nucleosomes-protein interactions can affect and can be affected by chromatin organization at the oligonucleosomal level. In addition, we review the characteristics of nucleosome-protein interactions that can cause phase separation of chromatin. Throughout, we hope to illustrate the exciting challenges in characterizing nucleosome-protein interactions beyond the nucleosome.

Protein-protein complexes orchestrate most cellular processes such as transcription, signal transduction and apoptosis. The factors governing their affinity remain elusive however, especially when it comes to describing dissociation rates (koff). Here we demonstrate that, next to direct contributions from the interface, the non-interacting surface (NIS) also plays an important role in binding affinity, especially polar and charged residues. Their percentage on the NIS is conserved over orthologous complexes indicating an evolutionary selection pressure. Their effect on binding affinity can be explained by long-range electrostatic contributions and surface-solvent interactions that are known to determine the local frustration of the protein complex surface. Including these in a simple model significantly improves the affinity prediction of protein complexes from structural models. The impact of mutations outside the interacting surface on binding affinity is supported by experimental alanine scanning mutagenesis data. These results enable the development of more sophisticated and integrated biophysical models of binding affinity and open new directions in experimental control and modulation of biomolecular interactions.

The outer membrane protein BamA is the key player in β-barrel assembly in Gram-negative bacteria. Despite the availability of high-resolution crystal structures, the dynamic behavior of the transmembrane domain and the large periplasmic extension consisting of five POTRA (POlypeptide-TRansport-Associated) domains remains unclear. We demonstrate reconstitution of full-length BamA in proteoliposomes at low lipid-to-protein ratio, leading to high sensitivity and resolution in solid-state NMR (ssNMR) experiments. We detect POTRA domains in ssNMR experiments probing rigid protein segments in our preparations. These results suggest that the periplasmic region of BamA is firmly attached to the β-barrel and does not experience fast global motion around the angle between POTRA 2 and 3. We show that this behavior holds at lower protein concentrations and elevated temperatures. Chemical shift variations observed after reconstitution in lipids with different chain lengths and saturation levels are compatible with conformational plasticity of BamA's transmembrane domain. Electron microscopy of the ssNMR samples shows that BamA can cause local disruptions of the lipid bilayer in proteoliposomes. The observed interplay between protein–protein and protein–lipid interactions may be critical for BamA-mediated insertion of substrates into the outer membrane. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

The Wnt pathway tumor-suppressor protein Axin coordinates the formation of a critical multiprotein destruction complex that serves to downregulate β-catenin protein levels, thereby preventing target gene activation. Given the lack of structural information on some of the major functional parts of Axin, it remains unresolved how the recruitment and positioning of Wnt pathway kinases, such as glycogen synthase kinase 3β, are coordinated to bring about β-catenin phosphorylation. Using various biochemical and biophysical methods, we demonstrate here that the central region of Axin that is implicated in binding glycogen synthase kinase 3β and β-catenin is natively unfolded. Our results support a model in which the unfolded nature of these critical scaffolding regions in Axin facilitates dynamic interactions with a kinase and its substrate, which in turn act upon each other. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

We report the first membrane protein-protein docking benchmark consisting of 37 targets of diverse functions and folds. The structures were chosen based on a set of parameters such as the availability of unbound structures, the modelling difficulty and their uniqueness. They have been cleaned and consistently numbered to facilitate their use in docking. Using this benchmark, we establish the baseline performance of HADDOCK, without any specific optimization for membrane proteins, for two scenarios: True interface-driven docking and ab-initio docking. Despite the fact that HADDOCK has been developed for soluble complexes, it shows promising docking performance for membrane systems, but there is clearly room for further optimisation. The resulting set of docking decoys, together with analysis scripts are made freely available. These can serve as a basis for the optimisation of membrane complex-specific scoring functions.

We present an updated and integrated version of our widely used protein–protein docking and binding affinity benchmarks. The benchmarks consist of non-redundant, high-quality structures of protein–protein complexes along with the unbound structures of their components. Fifty-five new complexes were added to the docking benchmark, 35 of which have experimentally measured binding affinities. These updated docking and affinity benchmarks now contain 230 and 179 entries, respectively. In particular, the number of antibody–antigen complexes has increased significantly, by 67% and 74% in the docking and affinity benchmarks, respectively. We tested previously developed docking and affinity prediction algorithms on the new cases. Considering only the top 10 docking predictions per benchmark case, a prediction accuracy of 38% is achieved on all 55 cases and up to 50% for the 32 rigid-body cases only. Predicted affinity scores are found to correlate with experimental binding energies up to r = 0.52 overall and r = 0.72 for the rigid complexes.

The solution structure of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) DNA-binding domain (DBD), consisting of 93 residues, has been refined from two and three-dimensional NMR data using an ensemble iterative relaxation matrix approach followed by direct NOE refinement with DINOSAUR. A set of 47 structures of the rat GR fragment Cys440-Arg510 was generated with distance geometry and further refined with a combination of restrained energy minimization and restrained molecular dynamics in a parallel refinement protocol. Distance constraints were obtained from an extensive set of NOE build-up curves in H2O and 2H2O via relaxation matrix calculations (1186 distance constraints from NOE intensities, 10 phi and 22 chi 1 dihedral angle constraints from J- coupling data were used for the calculations). The root-mean-square deviation values of the 11 best structures on the well-determined part of the protein (Cys440 to Ser448, His451 to Glu469 and Pro493 to Glu508) are 0.60 A and 1.20 A from the average for backbone and all heavy atoms, respectively. The final structures have R-factors around 0.40 and good stereochemical qualities. The first zinc-coordinating domain of the GR DBD is very similar to the crystal structure with a root-mean-square difference of 1.4 A. The second zinc-coordinating domain is still disordered in solution. No secondary structure element is found in this domain in the free state. As suggested by crystallographic studies on the estrogen receptor DBD-DNA and GR DBD-DNA complexes, part of this region will form a distorted helix and the D-box will undergo a conformational change upon cooperative binding to DNA.