1. Building District-Level Capacity for Continuous Improvement in Maternal and Newborn Health
- Author
-
Abebe Teshome, Lamesgin Alamineh, Danika Barry, Solomon Tesfaye, Kenneth Hepburn, Lynn M. Sibley, Kim Ethier Stover, Aynalem Hailemichael Frew, and Hajira Mohammed
- Subjects
Adult ,Rural Population ,Program evaluation ,Capacity Building ,Quality management ,Coaching ,Likert scale ,Interviews as Topic ,Young Adult ,Nursing ,Pregnancy ,Residence Characteristics ,Maternity and Midwifery ,Humans ,Medicine ,Family ,Maternal Health Services ,Cooperative Behavior ,Maternal Welfare ,business.industry ,Data Collection ,Infant Welfare ,Infant, Newborn ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Capacity building ,Quality Improvement ,Focused improvement ,Leadership ,General partnership ,Survey data collection ,Female ,Ethiopia ,Rural Health Services ,business ,Delivery of Health Care - Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The Maternal and Newborn Health in Ethiopia Partnership (MaNHEP) adapted a collaborative improvement strategy to develop woreda (district) leadership capacity to support and facilitate continuous improvement of community maternal and neonatal health (CMNH) and to provide a model for other woredas dubbed "lead" woredas. Community-level quality improvement (QI) teams tested solutions to improve CMNH care supported by monthly coaching and regular meetings to share experiences. This study examines the extent of the capacity built to support continuous improvement in CMNH care. METHODS: Surveys and in-depth interviews assessed the extent to which MaNHEP developed improvement capacity. A survey questionnaire evaluated woreda culture leadership support motivation and capacity for improvement activities. Interviews focused on respondents understanding and perceived value of the MaNHEP improvement approach. Bivariate analyses and multivariate linear regression models were used to analyze the survey data. Interview transcripts were organized by region cadre and key themes. RESULTS: Respondents reported significant positive changes in many areas of woreda culture and leadership including involving a cross-section of community stakeholders (increased from 3.0 to 4.6 on 5-point Likert scale) using improvement data for decision making (2.8-4.4) using locally developed and tested solutions to improve CMNH care (2.5-4.3) demonstrating a commitment to improve the health of women and newborns (2.6-4.2) and creating a supportive environment for coaches and QI teams to improve CMNH (2.6-4.0). The mean scores for capacity were 3.7 and higher reflecting respondents agreement that they had gained capacity in improvement skills. Interview respondents universally recognized the capacity built in the woredas. The themes of community empowerment and focused improvement emerged strongly from the interviews. DISCUSSION: MaNHEP was able to build capacity for continuous improvement and develop lead woredas. The multifaceted approach to building capacity was critical for the success in creating lead woredas able to serve as models for other districts. (c) 2014 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF