Search

Your search keyword '"Amy T. Hark"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Author "Amy T. Hark" Journal journal of microbiology & biology education
3 results on '"Amy T. Hark"'

1. Student Attitudes Contribute to the Effectiveness of a Genomics CURE

Author

David Lopatto, Anne G. Rosenwald, Rebecca C. Burgess, Catherine Silver Key, Melanie Van Stry, Matthew Wawersik, Justin R. DiAngelo, Amy T. Hark, Matthew Skerritt, Anna K. Allen, Consuelo Alvarez, Sara Anderson, Cindy Arrigo, Andrew Arsham, Daron Barnard, James E. J. Bedard, Indrani Bose, John M. Braverman, Martin G. Burg, Paula Croonquist, Chunguang Du, Sondra Dubowsky, Heather Eisler, Matthew A. Escobar, Michael Foulk, Thomas Giarla, Rivka L. Glaser, Anya L. Goodman, Yuying Gosser, Adam Haberman, Charles Hauser, Shan Hays, Carina E. Howell, Jennifer Jemc, Christopher J. Jones, Lisa Kadlec, Jacob D. Kagey, Kimberly L. Keller, Jennifer Kennell, Adam J. Kleinschmit, Melissa Kleinschmit, Nighat P. Kokan, Olga Ruiz Kopp, Meg M. Laakso, Judith Leatherman, Lindsey J. Long, Mollie Manier, Juan C. Martinez-Cruzado, Luis F. Matos, Amie Jo McClellan, Gerard McNeil, Evan Merkhofer, Vida Mingo, Hemlata Mistry, Elizabeth Mitchell, Nathan T. Mortimer, Jennifer Leigh Myka, Alexis Nagengast, Paul Overvoorde, Don Paetkau, Leocadia Paliulis, Susan Parrish, Stephanie Toering Peters, Mary Lai Preuss, James V. Price, Nicholas A. Pullen, Catherine Reinke, Dennis Revie, Srebrenka Robic, Jennifer A. Roecklein-Canfield, Michael R. Rubin, Takrima Sadikot, Jamie Siders Sanford, Maria Santisteban, Kenneth Saville, Stephanie Schroeder, Christopher D. Shaffer, Karim A. Sharif, Diane E. Sklensky, Chiyedza Small, Sheryl Smith, Rebecca Spokony, Aparna Sreenivasan, Joyce Stamm, Rachel Sterne-Marr, Katherine C. Teeter, Justin Thackeray, Jeffrey S. Thompson, Norma Velazquez-Ulloa, Cindy Wolfe, James Youngblom, Brian Yowler, Leming Zhou, Janie Brennan, Jeremy Buhler, Wilson Leung, Sarah C. R. Elgin, and Laura K. Reed

Subjects
active learning, bioinformatics, CUREs, genomics, undergraduate education, Special aspects of education, LC8-6691, Biology (General), QH301-705.5
Abstract

ABSTRACT The Genomics Education Partnership (GEP) engages students in a course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE). To better understand the student attributes that support success in this CURE, we asked students about their attitudes using previously published scales that measure epistemic beliefs about work and science, interest in science, and grit. We found, in general, that the attitudes students bring with them into the classroom contribute to two outcome measures, namely, learning as assessed by a pre- and postquiz and perceived self-reported benefits. While the GEP CURE produces positive outcomes overall, the students with more positive attitudes toward science, particularly with respect to epistemic beliefs, showed greater gains. The findings indicate the importance of a student’s epistemic beliefs to achieving positive learning outcomes.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Facilitating Growth through Frustration: Using Genomics Research in a Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Author

David Lopatto, Anne G. Rosenwald, Justin R. DiAngelo, Amy T. Hark, Matthew Skerritt, Matthew Wawersik, Anna K. Allen, Consuelo Alvarez, Sara Anderson, Cindy Arrigo, Andrew Arsham, Daron Barnard, Christopher Bazinet, James E. J. Bedard, Indrani Bose, John M. Braverman, Martin G. Burg, Rebecca C. Burgess, Paula Croonquist, Chunguang Du, Sondra Dubowsky, Heather Eisler, Matthew A. Escobar, Michael Foulk, Emily Furbee, Thomas Giarla, Rivka L. Glaser, Anya L. Goodman, Yuying Gosser, Adam Haberman, Charles Hauser, Shan Hays, Carina E. Howell, Jennifer Jemc, M. Logan Johnson, Christopher J. Jones, Lisa Kadlec, Jacob D. Kagey, Kimberly L. Keller, Jennifer Kennell, S. Catherine Silver Key, Adam J. Kleinschmit, Melissa Kleinschmit, Nighat P. Kokan, Olga Ruiz Kopp, Meg M. Laakso, Judith Leatherman, Lindsey J. Long, Mollie Manier, Juan C. Martinez-Cruzado, Luis F. Matos, Amie Jo McClellan, Gerard McNeil, Evan Merkhofer, Vida Mingo, Hemlata Mistry, Elizabeth Mitchell, Nathan T. Mortimer, Debaditya Mukhopadhyay, Jennifer Leigh Myka, Alexis Nagengast, Paul Overvoorde, Don Paetkau, Leocadia Paliulis, Susan Parrish, Mary Lai Preuss, James V. Price, Nicholas A. Pullen, Catherine Reinke, Dennis Revie, Srebrenka Robic, Jennifer A. Roecklein-Canfield, Michael R. Rubin, Takrima Sadikot, Jamie Siders Sanford, Maria Santisteban, Kenneth Saville, Stephanie Schroeder, Christopher D. Shaffer, Karim A. Sharif, Diane E. Sklensky, Chiyedza Small, Mary Smith, Sheryl Smith, Rebecca Spokony, Aparna Sreenivasan, Joyce Stamm, Rachel Sterne-Marr, Katherine C. Teeter, Justin Thackeray, Jeffrey S. Thompson, Stephanie Toering Peters, Melanie Van Stry, Norma Velazquez-Ulloa, Cindy Wolfe, James Youngblom, Brian Yowler, Leming Zhou, Janie Brennan, Jeremy Buhler, Wilson Leung, Laura K. Reed, and Sarah C. R. Elgin

Subjects
Special aspects of education, LC8-6691, Biology (General), QH301-705.5
Abstract

A hallmark of the research experience is encountering difficulty and working through those challenges to achieve success. This ability is essential to being a successful scientist, but replicating such challenges in a teaching setting can be difficult. The Genomics Education Partnership (GEP) is a consortium of faculty who engage their students in a genomics Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE). Students participate in genome annotation, generating gene models using multiple lines of experimental evidence. Our observations suggested that the students’ learning experience is continuous and recursive, frequently beginning with frustration but eventually leading to success as they come up with defendable gene models. In order to explore our “formative frustration” hypothesis, we gathered data from faculty via a survey, and from students via both a general survey and a set of student focus groups. Upon analyzing these data, we found that all three datasets mentioned frustration and struggle, as well as learning and better understanding of the scientific process. Bioinformatics projects are particularly well suited to the process of iteration and refinement because iterations can be performed quickly and are inexpensive in both time and money. Based on these findings, we suggest that a dynamic of “formative frustration” is an important aspect for a successful CURE.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Facilitating Growth through Frustration: Using Genomics Research in a Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Author

John M. Braverman, Kenneth Saville, Mollie K. Manier, Katherine C. Teeter, Sarah C. R. Elgin, Rachel Sterne-Marr, Debaditya Mukhopadhyay, Adam Haberman, M. Logan Johnson, Jacob D. Kagey, Emily Furbee, Matthew A. Escobar, Vida Mingo, Stephanie Schroeder, Srebrenka Robic, Anya Goodman, Catherine Reinke, Yuying Gosser, Meg M. Laakso, Mary A. Smith, Daron C. Barnard, Christopher Bazinet, Nathan T. Mortimer, Mary L. Preuss, Cindy Arrigo, Paul J. Overvoorde, Elizabeth Mitchell, Rebecca C. Burgess, Wilson Leung, Diane Sklensky, Laura K. Reed, Lindsey J. Long, Don W. Paetkau, Melissa Kleinschmit, Judith Leatherman, Olga R. Kopp, Janie Brennan, Joyce Stamm, Chunguang Du, Norma A. Velázquez-Ulloa, Thomas C. Giarla, Gerard P. McNeil, Justin Thackeray, Andrew M. Arsham, Jeremy Buhler, Jennifer A. Kennell, Sara J. Anderson, Leming Zhou, Takrima Sadikot, Alexis Nagengast, Susan Parrish, Heather L. Eisler, Dennis Revie, Leocadia V. Paliulis, Chiyedza Small, Anna K. Allen, Amy T. Hark, James E. J. Bedard, Lisa Kadlec, Jeffery S. Thompson, Paula Croonquist, James V. Price, Stephanie Toering Peters, Evan C. Merkhofer, Melanie Van Stry, Matthew Skerritt, Anne G. Rosenwald, Cindy Wolfe, Nicholas Pullen, Nighat P. Kokan, Sondra Dubowsky, Jamie Siders Sanford, Rebecca Spokony, Luis F. Matos, Christopher D. Shaffer, Consuelo J. Alvarez, Justin R. DiAngelo, Jennifer Roecklein-Canfield, Maria Soledad Santisteban, Sheryl T. Smith, Juan Carlos Martínez-Cruzado, Indrani Bose, Christopher J. Jones, Adam Kleinschmit, Brian Yowler, Karim A. Sharif, S. Catherine Silver Key, Amie J. McClellan, Matthew Wawersik, Jennifer C. Jemc, Carina E. Howell, Hemlata Mistry, Rivka L. Glaser, Shan Hays, Kimberly L. Keller, Michael R. Rubin, Martin G. Burg, David Lopatto, Charles R. Hauser, James J. Youngblom, Jennifer Leigh Myka, Michael S. Foulk, and Aparna Sreenivasan

Subjects
QH301-705.5, Process (engineering), media_common.quotation_subject, Frustration, General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Education, Formative assessment, 03 medical and health sciences, Mathematics education, Biology (General), Set (psychology), lcsh:QH301-705.5, 030304 developmental biology, media_common, lcsh:LC8-6691, 0303 health sciences, LC8-6691, lcsh:Special aspects of education, General Immunology and Microbiology, Research, 4. Education, 05 social sciences, 050301 education, Special aspects of education, Focus group, lcsh:Biology (General), Undergraduate research, General partnership, Working through, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Psychology, 0503 education
Abstract

A hallmark of the research experience is encountering experimental difficulty and working through that challenge to reach success. The ability to overcome scientific challenges is essential to being a successful scientist, but replicating these challenges can be difficult in a teaching setting. The Genomics Education Partnership (GEP) is a consortium of faculty who engage their students in a genomics Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE). Students participate in genome annotation, generating gene models using multiple lines of experimental evidence. Our observations suggested that the students’ learning experience in this research is continuous and recursive, frequently beginning with frustration but eventually leading to success. In order to explore our “formative frustration” hypothesis, we gathered data about this research experience from faculty via a survey, and from students both via a general survey and a small set of focus groups administered at the end of the GEP CURE. All three datasets contained comments mentioning frustration and struggle, as well as learning and better understanding of the scientific process. Bioinformatics projects are particularly well suited to the process of iteration and refinement because iterations can be performed quickly and are inexpensive in both time and money. Based on these findings, we suggest that a dynamic of what we have deemed “formative frustration” is an important aspect for a successful CURE.

Published
2020

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results