Search

The antibody response specific to the 25-kDa major outer-membrane protein (Omp25) of Brucella melitensis expressed in Escherichia coli was assessed in BALB/c mice. Groups of mice were immunised and boosted either with sonicated E. coli carrying plasmid pAC2533-E. coli (pAC2533)-expressing the gene coding for Omp25 (omp25 gene) of B. melitensis, or with E. coli carrying plasmid pUC19-E. coli (pUC19). One control group received saline. The evolution of antibody responses was investigated by indirect ELISA with whole rough (R) B. melitensis H38 cells as antigen. Serum antibody titres of mice immunised with E. coli (pAC2533) were appreciably higher than those of mice immunised with E. coli (pUC19). The specificity to Omp25 of murine antibodies induced by E. coli (pAC2533) was demonstrated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting of five B. melitensis strains. Binding of antibody in E. coli (pAC2533) immune sera to the surface of B. melitensis strains differing in their smooth lipopolysaccharide (S-LPS) expression was also studied by whole-cell ELISA and by flow cytometry. Antibody reactivity to R and smooth-rough (S-R) was much stronger than that to smooth (S) B. melitensis strains, indicating a much better accessibility of Omp25 to antibody on strains lacking or expressing less O-polysaccharide on their surface. The antibodies to Omp25 were predominantly of IgG2a isotype. The capacity of E. coli (pAC2533) to induce protective immune responses against four challenge strains of B. melitensis was further evaluated in mice. Significant reductions in splenic infections, in comparison with mice immunised with E. coli (pUC19) and unimmunised (saline injection) mice, were observed in R B. melitensis B115, S-R B. melitensis EP and S B. melitensis H38 infected mice. Protection against S B. melitensis 16M was not significant. The data from the present study, together with previous results, suggest that humoral immunity against probably conformational, well-exposed epitopes of the Omp25 could contribute to protective mechanisms against B. melitensis infection in mice.

Brucellergene is a commercial allergen prepared from Brucella melitensis strain B115 and containing at least 20 cytoplasmic proteins. These proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. The unstained gel was divided into 18 fractions and proteins were eluted from the gel fractions. The capacity of the separated proteins to elicit delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) in infected guinea-pigs or to induce the production of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) by blood cells from infected cattle was evaluated. The biological activity of the corresponding protein fractions blotted on to nitrocellulose was measured in a lymphocyte blastogenesis assay. Among the 18 fractions tested, two-spanning the mol. wt ranges 17-22 (fraction 8) and 35-42-kDa (fraction 17)-showed the maximum biological activity in the three tests. These fractions contain two antigens, the Brucella bacterioferritin (BFR) and P39 proteins. Both proteins are good candidates for the detection of cellular immunity to Brucella.

Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) were produced to Brucella melitensis cytosoluble proteins (CP) with apparent molecular masses of 12, 24 and 28 kDa (CP12, CP24 and CP28) which were previously shown by immunoblotting to differentiate antibody responses of infected sheep from those of B. melitensis strain Rev. 1 vaccinated sheep. These MAbs were derived from mice infected with virulent smooth (S) B. melitensis strain H38. Most MAbs obtained were directed to CP28, which indicated (as was shown in infected sheep) that this protein was also highly immunogenic in mice. A large number of MAbs that showed reactivity to CP in ELISA but did not show reactivity in immunoblotting of CP were also obtained and might recognise conformational epitopes of these proteins. MAbs were used to localise CP12, CP24 and CP28. None of the MAbs reacted with whole B. melitensis cells in ELISA but showed reactivity with sonicated bacteria in ELISA, which indicated an internal localisation of these proteins. Among several B. melitensis B115 subcellular fractions tested, the anti-CP12 and anti-CP28 MAbs reacted essentially with the CP extract (CPE) in both ELISA and immunoblotting, whereas the anti-CP24 MAbs reacted with both CPE and cell envelope fraction (CEF)-although with lower intensity to the latter fraction. The internal localisation of these proteins was confirmed by immuno-electron microscopy of thin-sectioned B. melitensis B115 or B. melitensis 16M cells. Immunogold labelling was mainly observed in the cytoplasm and, consequently, CP12, CP24 and CP28 are probably cytoplasmic proteins. Immunoblotting of whole cell lysates with the MAbs also showed the presence of these proteins in all Brucella species and biovars, including the vaccine strains B. melitensis Rev. 1 and B. abortus B19. The use of these MAbs should help further study of antibody responses in sheep and other hosts and may be of considerable value for developing new diagnostic tests for ovine brucellosis.

Brucella ovis, a naturally virulent rough Brucella species, is the aetiological agent of ram epididymitis. The identification of protective antigens is necessary to obtain a safe, specific subcellular vaccine. Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed at both brucella outer-membrane proteins (OMPs) and rough lipopolysaccharide (R-LPS) in a mouse protection test were used to identify potential targets for humoral immunity. Mixtures of MAbs directed at the 16.5-, 25-27-, 31-34- and 36-38-kDa OMPs conferred significant protection 7 days after challenge with reference strain B. ovis 63/290 compared with controls receiving either saline or an anti-brucella O-polysaccharide MAb. Furthermore, an anti-R-LPS MAb tested alone conferred protection at a level comparable with that obtained with the mixture of anti-OMP MAbs. The combination of protective OMP MAbs with the anti-R-LPS MAb was also strongly protective. One combination of OMP MAbs, which bound intensely to B. ovis in vitro, was ineffective. These results indicate that B. ovis OMPs and R-LPS are targets for protective antibodies and that they can be regarded as candidates for ram epididymitis subcellular vaccines.