Search

Purpose: Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) has the potential to provide superior image quality to energy-integrating CT (EICT). We objectively compare PCCT to EICT for liver lesion detection., Approach: Fifty anthropomorphic, computational phantoms with inserted liver lesions were generated. Contrast-enhanced scans of each phantom were simulated at the portal venous phase. The acquisitions were done using DukeSim, a validated CT simulation platform. Scans were simulated at two dose levels ( CTDI vol 1.5 to 6.0 mGy) modeling PCCT (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) and EICT (SOMATOM Flash, Siemens). Images were reconstructed with varying levels of kernel sharpness (soft, medium, sharp). To provide a quantitative estimate of image quality, the modulation transfer function (MTF), frequency at 50% of the MTF ( f 50 ), noise magnitude, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR, per lesion), and detectability index ( d ' , per lesion) were measured., Results: Across all studied conditions, the best detection performance, measured by d ' , was for PCCT images with the highest dose level and softest kernel. With soft kernel reconstruction, PCCT demonstrated improved lesion CNR and d ' compared with EICT, with a mean increase in CNR of 35.0% ( p < 0.001 ) and 21% ( p < 0.001 ) and a mean increase in d ' of 41.0% ( p < 0.001 ) and 23.3% ( p = 0.007 ) for the 1.5 and 6.0 mGy acquisitions, respectively. The improvements were greatest for larger phantoms, low-contrast lesions, and low-dose scans., Conclusions: PCCT demonstrated objective improvement in liver lesion detection and image quality metrics compared with EICT. These advances may lead to earlier and more accurate liver lesion detection, thus improving patient care., (© 2024 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).)

Background: The accuracy of morphological radiomic features (MRFs) can be affected by various acquisition settings and imaging conditions. To ensure that clinically irrelevant changes do not reduce sensitivity to capture the radiomics changes between successive acquisitions, it is essential to determine the optimal imaging systems and protocols to use., Purpose: The main goal of our study was to optimize CT protocols and minimize the minimum detectable difference (MDD) in successive acquisitions of MRFs., Method: MDDs were derived based on the previous research involving 15 realizations of nodule models at two different sizes. Our study involved simulations of two consecutive acquisitions using 297 different imaging conditions, representing variations in scanners' reconstruction kernels, dose levels, and slice thicknesses. Parametric polynomial models were developed to establish correlations between imaging system characteristics, lesion size, and MDDs. Additionally, polynomial models were used to model the correlation of the imaging system parameters. Optimization problems were formulated for each MRF to minimize the approximated function. Feature importance was determined for each MRF through permutation feature analysis. The proposed method was compared to the recommended guidelines by the quantitative imaging biomarkers alliance (QIBA)., Results: The feature importance analysis showed that lesion size is the most influential parameter to estimate the MDDs in most of the MRFs. Our study revealed that thinner slices and higher doses had a measurable impact on reducing the MDDs. Higher spatial resolution and lower noise magnitude were identified as the most suitable or noninferior acquisition settings. Compared to QIBA, the proposed protocol selection guideline demonstrated a reduced coefficient of variation, with values decreasing from 1.49 to 1.11 for large lesions and from 1.68 to 1.12 for small lesions., Conclusion: The protocol optimization framework provides means to assess and optimize protocols to minimize the MDD to increase the sensitivity of the measurements in lung cancer screening., (© 2024 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).)

Background: The accuracy and variability of quantification in computed tomography angiography (CTA) are affected by the interplay of imaging parameters and patient attributes. The assessment of these combined effects has been an open engineering challenge., Purpose: In this study, we developed a framework that optimizes imaging parameters for accurate and consistent coronary stenosis quantification in cardiac CTA while accounting for patient-specific variables., Methods: The framework utilizes a task-specific image quality index, the estimability index ( e ' ), approximated by a surrogate estimability polynomial function (EPF) capable of finding the optimal protocol that (1) maximizes image quality with an upper bound for desired radiation dose or (2) minimizes the dose level with a lower bound of acceptable image quality. The optimization process was formulated with the decision variables being subject to a set of constraints. The methodology was verified using CTA data from a prior clinical trial (prospective multi-center imaging study for evaluation of chest pain) by assessing the concordance of its prediction with the trial results. Further, the framework was used to derive an optimum protocol for each case based on the patient attributes, gauging how much improvement would have been possible if the derived optimized protocol would have been deployed., Results: The framework produced results consistent with imaging physics principles with approximated EPFs of 97% accuracy. The feature importance evaluation demonstrated a close match with earlier studies. The verification study found e ' scores closely predicting the cardiologist scores to within 95% in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and predicting potential for either an average of fourfold increase in e ' within a targeted dose or a reduction in radiation dose by an average of 57% without reducing the image quality., Conclusions: The protocol optimization framework provides means to assess and optimize CTA in terms of either image quality or radiation dose objectives with its results predicting prior clinical trial findings., (© 2023 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).)

Purpose: Accurate classification of COVID-19 in chest radiographs is invaluable to hard-hit pandemic hot spots. Transfer learning techniques for images using well-known convolutional neural networks show promise in addressing this problem. These methods can significantly benefit from supplemental training on similar conditions, considering that there currently exists no widely available chest x-ray dataset on COVID-19. We evaluate whether targeted pretraining for similar tasks in radiography labeling improves classification performance in a sample radiograph dataset containing COVID-19 cases. Approach: We train a DenseNet121 to classify chest radiographs through six training schemes. Each training scheme is designed to incorporate cases from established datasets for general findings in chest radiography (CXR) and pneumonia, with a control scheme with no pretraining. The resulting six permutations are then trained and evaluated on a dataset of 1060 radiographs collected from 475 patients after March 2020, containing 801 images of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases. Results: Sequential training phases yielded substantial improvement in classification accuracy compared to a baseline of standard transfer learning with ImageNet parameters. The test set area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for COVID-19 classification improved from 0.757 in the control to 0.857 for the optimal training scheme in the available images. Conclusions: We achieve COVID-19 classification accuracies comparable to previous benchmarks of pneumonia classification. Deliberate sequential training, rather than pooling datasets, is critical in training effective COVID-19 classifiers within the limitations of early datasets. These findings bring clinical-grade classification through CXR within reach for more regions impacted by COVID-19., (© 2021 The Authors.)

Purpose : Developing, validating, and evaluating a method for measuring noise texture directly from patient liver CT images (i.e., in vivo ). Approach : The method identifies target regions within patient scans that are least likely to have major contribution of patient anatomy, detrends them locally, and measures noise power spectrum (NPS) there using a previously phantom-validated technique targeting perceptual noise-non-anatomical fluctuations in the image that may interfere with the detection of focal lesions. Method development and validation used scanner-specific CT simulations of computational, anthropomorphic phantom (XCAT phantom, three phases of contrast-enhancement) with known ground truth of the NPS. Simulations were based on a clinical scanner (Definition Flash, Siemens) and clinically relevant settings (tube voltage of 120 kV at three dose levels). Images were reconstructed with filtered backprojection (kernel: B31, B41, and B50) and Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (kernel: I31, I41, and I50) using a manufacturer-specific reconstruction software (ReconCT, Siemens). All NPS measurements were made in the liver. Ground-truth NPS were taken as the sum of (1) a measurement in parenchymal regions of anatomy-subtracted (i.e., noise only) scans, and (2) a measurement in the same region of noise-free (pre-noise-insertion) images. To assess in vivo NPS performance, correlation of NPS average frequency ( f avg ), was reported. Sensitivity of accuracy [root-mean-square-error (RMSE)] to number of pixels included in measurement was conducted via bootstrapped pixel-dropout. Sensitivity of NPS to dose and reconstruction kernel was assessed to confirm that ground truth NPS similarities were maintained in patient-specific measurements. Results : Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients 0.97 and 0.96 for f avg indicated good correlation. Results suggested accurate NPS measurements (within 5% total RMSE) could be acquired with ∼ 10 6    pixels . Conclusions : Relationships of similar NPS due to reconstruction kernel and dose were preserved between gold standard and observed in vivo estimations. The NPS estimation method was further deployed on clinical cases to demonstrate the feasibility of clinical analysis., (© 2021 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).)

Purpose: To utilize a virtual clinical trial (VCT) construct to investigate the effects of beam collimation and pitch on image quality (IQ) in computed tomography (CT) under different respiratory and cardiac motion rates. Approach: A computational human model [extended cardiac-torso (XCAT) phantom] with added lung lesions was used to simulate seven different rates of cardiac and respiratory motions. A validated CT simulator (DukeSim) was used in this study. A supplemental validation was done to ensure the accuracy of DukeSim across different pitches and beam collimations. Each XCAT phantom was imaged using the CT simulator at multiple pitches (0.5 to 1.5) and beam collimations (19.2 to 57.6 mm) at a constant dose level. The images were compared against the ground truth using three task-generic IQ metrics in the lungs. Additionally, the bias and variability in radiomics (morphological) feature measurements were quantified for task-specific lung lesion quantification across the studied imaging conditions. Results: All task-generic metrics degraded by 1.6% to 13.3% with increasing pitch. When imaged with motion, increasing pitch reduced motion artifacts. The IQ slightly degraded (1.3%) with changes in the studied beam collimations. Patient motion exhibited negative effects (within 7%) on the IQ. Among all features across all imaging conditions studies, compactness2 and elongation showed the largest ( - 26.5 % , 7.8%) and smallest ( - 0.8 % , 2.7%) relative bias and variability. The radiomics results were robust across the motion profiles studied. Conclusions: While high pitch and large beam collimations can negatively affect the quality of CT images, they are desirable for fast imaging. Further, our results showed no major adverse effects in morphology quantification of lung lesions with the increase in pitch or beam collimation. VCTs, such as the one demonstrated in this study, represent a viable methodology for experiments in CT., (© 2020 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).)

The accelerating complexity and variety of medical imaging devices and methods have outpaced the ability to evaluate and optimize their design and clinical use. This is a significant and increasing challenge for both scientific investigations and clinical applications. Evaluations would ideally be done using clinical imaging trials. These experiments, however, are often not practical due to ethical limitations, expense, time requirements, or lack of ground truth. Virtual clinical trials (VCTs) (also known as in silico imaging trials or virtual imaging trials) offer an alternative means to efficiently evaluate medical imaging technologies virtually. They do so by simulating the patients, imaging systems, and interpreters. The field of VCTs has been constantly advanced over the past decades in multiple areas. We summarize the major developments and current status of the field of VCTs in medical imaging. We review the core components of a VCT: computational phantoms, simulators of different imaging modalities, and interpretation models. We also highlight some of the applications of VCTs across various imaging modalities., (© 2020 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).)

Texture is a key radiomics measurement for quantification of disease and disease progression. The sensitivity of the measurements to image acquisition, however, is uncertain. We assessed bias and variability of computed tomography (CT) texture feature measurements across many clinical image acquisition settings and reconstruction algorithms. Diverse, anatomically informed textures (texture A, B, and C) were simulated across 1188 clinically relevant CT imaging conditions representing four in-plane pixel sizes (0.4, 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9 mm), three slice thicknesses (0.625, 1.25, and 2.5 mm), three dose levels ( CTDI vol 1.90, 3.75, and 7.50 mGy), and 33 reconstruction kernels. Imaging conditions corresponded to noise and resolution properties representative of five commercial scanners (GE LightSpeed VCT, GE Discovery 750 HD, GE Revolution, Siemens Definition Flash, and Siemens Force) in filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction. About 21 texture features were calculated and compared between the ground-truth phantom (i.e., preimaging) and its corresponding images. Each feature was measured with four unique volumes of interest (VOIs) sizes (244, 579, 1000, and 1953    mm 3 . To characterize the bias, the percentage relative difference [PRD(%)] in each feature was calculated between the imaged scenario and the ground truth for all VOI sizes. Feature variability was assessed in terms of (1)  σ PRD ( % ) indicating the variability between the ground truth and simulated image scenario based on the PRD(%), (2)  COV f indicating the simulation-based variability, and (3)  COV T indicating the natural variability present in the ground-truth phantom. The PRD ranged widely from - 97 % to 1220%, with an underlying variability ( σ ) of up to 241%. Features such as gray-level nonuniformity, texture entropy, sum average, and homogeneity exhibited low susceptibility to reconstruction kernel effects ( PRD < 3 % ) with relatively small σ PRD ( % ) ( ≤ 5 % ) across imaging conditions. The dynamic range of results indicates that image acquisition and reconstruction conditions of in-plane pixel sizes, slice thicknesses, dose levels, and reconstruction kernels can lead to significant bias and variability in feature measurements.