Search

Introduction To compare outcomes of different salvage treatment modalities in patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who remain FDG-PET positive after R-CHOP chemotherapy. Existing data on these patients with FDG-PET primary refractory disease are limited. Methods Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or grade 3 follicular lymphoma were retrospectively reviewed from the Prince of Wales Hospital databases. Eligibility criteria were: age≥18 years, treated with R-CHOP, with positive post-chemotherapy FDG-PET. Salvage treatment modalities were: radical radiotherapy (RT, dose≥30 Gy), high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), or non-radical management. Survival was calculated from date of post-chemotherapy FDG-PET to last follow-up. Results Twenty-six patients from 2003-2015 met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 60 (range 19-84). Most had adverse baseline features: 21 (81%) stage III-IV, 24 (92%) bulky disease and nine (35%) skeletal involvement. Characteristics of PET-positivity post-chemotherapy were single site in 16 (62%), sites of prior bulk in 24 of 24, skeletal sites in five of nine, and able to be encompassed by RT in 21 (81%). Salvage treatment was: radical RT in 17 (65%), ASCT in four (15%) and non-radical in five (20%). Median follow-up of surviving patients was 31 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 3-year PFS and OS were 41% and 52%, respectively. By salvage modality, 3-year PFS was 51% for RT, 25% for ASCT and 20% for non-radical treatment, (P = 0.453); 3-year OS was respectively 65%, 25% and 40% (P = 0.173). Conclusion Patients with FDG-PET positive disease after R-CHOP for aggressive B-cell NHL are salvageable with radiotherapy.

Introduction: Having previously modelled the optimal proportion of uterine cervix and corpus cancers that should be treated with brachytherapy (BT), we aimed to complete the assessment of the role of BT for gynaecological cancers by estimating the optimal proportion of vaginal cancer cases that should be treated with BT, the optimal BT utilisation (BTU) rate for vaginal cancer. We compared this with actual vaginal BTU and assessed quality of BT for vaginal cancer by a Patterns-of-Care Study (POCS). Methods: Evidence-based guidelines were used to construct an optimal BTU decision tree for vaginal cancer. Searches of the epidemiological literature to ascertain the proportion of patients who fulfilled the criteria for BT were conducted. The robustness of the model was tested by sensitivity analyses and by peer review. A retrospective POCS of BT in New South Wales (NSW) for 2003 was conducted, and actual BTU for vaginal cancer was determined. Differences between optimal and actual BTU were assessed. Quality of BT for vaginal cancer was compared with published benchmarks. Results: The optimal vaginal cancer BTU rate was estimated to be 85% (range 81–87%). In NSW in 2003, actual vaginal cancer BTU was only 42% (95% confidence interval 22–62%). In NSW, only nine patients were treated, all with intra-vaginal cylinders, and two of four to lower than recommended doses. Conclusions: BT for vaginal cancers is underutilised in NSW compared with the proposed optimal models of care. BT quality may have been suboptimal and this may relate to the rarity of this disease.

Background Local control for extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STS) requires surgery combined with radiotherapy, usually given pre-operatively or post-operatively. The modified Eilber protocol, a neoadjuvant chemoradiation regimen, has been reported with excellent local control rates. This retrospective single-centre study compared outcomes for patients treated with the modified Eilber protocol with those treated with standard adjuvant radiotherapy. Methods Patients with a diagnosis of extremity STS were retrospectively reviewed from the Prince of Wales Hospital Sarcoma Database from 1995 to 2012. Sixty-three patients underwent curative surgery with either neoadjuvant Eilber chemoradiotherapy (Eilber) or adjuvant radiotherapy (Adjuvant). Results Twenty-nine patients were treated with modified Eilber protocol. Thirty-four patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. Three patients (10%) in the Eilber group and five patients (15%) in the Adjuvant group developed local recurrence (P = 0.87). Major acute wound complications were noted in four patients in each group (P = 0.55). One patient (3.4%) in the Eilber group developed Grade 3 or 4 late toxicities after 1 year compared with nine patients (27%) in the Adjuvant group (P = 0.02). Conclusion Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (Eilber protocol) provided similar rates of local control when compared with adjuvant radiotherapy. Acute wound complication rates were similar but there was less severe late toxicity in the Eilber group.

Having previously modelled the optimal proportion of uterine cervix and corpus cancers that should be treated with brachytherapy (BT), we aimed to complete the assessment of the role of BT for gynaecological cancers by estimating the optimal proportion of vaginal cancer cases that should be treated with BT, the optimal BT utilisation (BTU) rate for vaginal cancer. We compared this with actual vaginal BTU and assessed quality of BT for vaginal cancer by a Patterns-of-Care Study (POCS).Evidence-based guidelines were used to construct an optimal BTU decision tree for vaginal cancer. Searches of the epidemiological literature to ascertain the proportion of patients who fulfilled the criteria for BT were conducted. The robustness of the model was tested by sensitivity analyses and by peer review. A retrospective POCS of BT in New South Wales (NSW) for 2003 was conducted, and actual BTU for vaginal cancer was determined. Differences between optimal and actual BTU were assessed. Quality of BT for vaginal cancer was compared with published benchmarks.The optimal vaginal cancer BTU rate was estimated to be 85% (range 81-87%). In NSW in 2003, actual vaginal cancer BTU was only 42% (95% confidence interval 22-62%). In NSW, only nine patients were treated, all with intra-vaginal cylinders, and two of four to lower than recommended doses.BT for vaginal cancers is underutilised in NSW compared with the proposed optimal models of care. BT quality may have been suboptimal and this may relate to the rarity of this disease.