Search

Improving radiotherapy services in low-income countries in the Asia-Pacific region LMICs had just started introducing the new technologies and treatment techniques of linac-based treatment, but the lack of trained RTTs and ROMPs severely compromised the delivery of safe, accurate and effective treatment. The Windeyer Fellowship Award by the College commemorates the career of the late Sir Brian Windeyer (1904-1994).1 He was the first radium registrar at RPAH, Sydney in 1928, and he trained at the Radium Institute in Paris and then spent his career in radiotherapy at the Middlesex Hospital, London. [Extracted from the article]

The author reflects on data from the New South Wales (NSW) Health Radiotherapy Management Information Systems reports to show that the usage of radiotherapy has not been improved from 1999 to 2008 in Australia and New Zealand. This report shows that even though there have been improvements in staffing, the increase in the number of linear accelerators (linacs) has only kept pace with the increases in cancer incidence. The author notes that there is a need for faculty and radiation oncologists to be proactive and to disseminate the benefits of their specialty to the public.

In New South Wales (NSW) from 1996 to 2006, only 34–37% of newly diagnosed cancer patients were treated with radiotherapy instead of the 50% proposed by NSW Health in Radiotherapy Plans released in 1991, 1995 and 2003. As a consequence, over 50 000 cancer patients were not treated and has resulted in the estimated premature death of over 8000 patients and over 40 000 years of life lost. In 2008, there were 42 linear accelerators in NSW rather than the 62 recommended. Based on cancer incidence projections, NSW will require 69 linear accelerators in 2012 – a shortfall of 27 linear accelerators. Already 15 linear accelerators have been approved. NSW Health has funding for seven extra linear accelerators, and eight extra linear accelerators are to be funded by the private sector. To make up the shortfall, a ‘Catch Up’ Plan is proposed for an additional 12 linear accelerators by the end of fiscal year 2012. This is estimated to cost $200 million over 4 years for one-off establishment costs for buildings and equipment plus $50 million per year for recurrent operating costs such as staff salaries. The ‘Catch Up’ Plan will create five new departments of radiation oncology in country hospitals and three new departments in metropolitan hospitals. These will be in addition to those already approved by NSW Health and will markedly improve access for treatment and result in an improvement in cancer survival. This significant increase in departments and equipment can only be achieved by the creation of an NSW Radiotherapy Taskforce similar to that proposed in the Baume report of 2002, ‘A vision for radiotherapy’. Even if the ‘Catch Up’ Plan bridges the gap in service provision, forward planning beyond 2012 should commence immediately as 76 linear accelerators will be required for NSW in 2015 and 81 linear accelerators in 2017. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An obituary for surgeon and radiation oncologist Derek Oliver Berg is presented.

Prior to introducing intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) into our department we undertook a comparison of the dose parameters of several IMRT techniques and standard wedged tangents (SWT). Our aim was to improve the dose distribution to the breast and to decrease the dose to organs at risk (OAR): heart, lung and contralateral breast (Contra Br). Treatment plans for 20 women (10 right-sided and 10 left-sided) previously treated with SWT for WBRT were used to compare (a) SWT; (b) electronic compensators IMRT (E-IMRT); (c) tangential beam IMRT (T-IMRT); (d) coplanar multi-field IMRT (CP-IMRT); and (e) non-coplanar multi-field IMRT (NCP-IMRT). Plans for the breast were compared for (i) dose homogeneity (DH); (ii) conformity index (CI); (iii) mean dose; (iv) maximum dose; (v) minimum dose; and dose to OAR were calculated (vi) heart; (vii) lung and (viii) Contra Br. Compared with SWT, all plans except CP-IMRT gave improvement in at least two of the seven parameters evaluated. T-IMRT and NCP-IMRT resulted in significant improvement in all parameters except DH and both gave significant reduction in doses to OAR. As on initial evaluation NCP-IMRT is likely to be too time consuming to introduce on a large scale, T-IMRT is the preferred technique for WBRT for use in our department. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]