Search

Objective: Data regarding the use of the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) system in extremely obese women (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 50 kg/m2) undergoing cesarean delivery are limited. We sought to examine the rate of wound complications in extremely obese women according to postcesarean dressings (NPWT [PICO, Smith & Nephew, St. Peterburg, FL] versus standard dressings).Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study of all extremely obese women (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2) at 23 weeks' gestation or greater who underwent cesarean delivery at an academic teaching hospital in Washington, DC, between January 2009 and September 2017. During this period, a PICO Single Use NPWT system was used at our institution. Women who missed a postpartum follow-up were excluded. Since 2014, Medstar Washington Hospital Center recommended the use of a PICO Single Use NPWT system for extremely obese women at the time of delivery. However, the ultimate decision to use the NPWT was made by attending physicians, considering the cost of the device and the risk of wound complication. Our primary outcome was a composite of cellulitis, hematoma/seroma, and wound dehiscence. Coarsened exact matching with k-to-k solution was performed using BMI, rupture of membranes, and labor.Results: Of 179 extremely obese women, 73 (40.8%) and 106 (59.2%) received NPWT and standard dressings, respectively; 61 women who received NPWT were matched to 61 women who received standard dressings. The rates of the primary outcome in the unmatched cohort were similar between women who received NPWT and those who received standard dressings (20.6 versus 16.0%; p = .44). The rates of primary outcome remained similar between women who received NPWT and those who received standard dressings after matching (18.0 versus 18.0%; p = 1.00).Conclusion: In extremely obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, prophylactic PICO NPWT was not associated with a decreased risk of the primary outcome compared with standard dressings. A large prospective randomized controlled trial would be useful to answer if NPWT is beneficial for extremely obese women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To determine the performance of third trimester ultrasound in women with suspected fetal macrosomia.Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of fetal ultrasounds from January 2004 to December 2014 with estimated fetal weight (EFW) between 4000 and 5000 g. We determined accuracy of birth weight prediction for ultrasound performed at less than and greater than 38 weeks, accounting for diabetic status and time between ultrasound and delivery.Results: There were 405 ultrasounds evaluated. One hundred and twelve (27.7%) were performed at less than 38 weeks, 293 (72.3%) at greater than 38 weeks, and 91 (22.5%) were performed in diabetics. Sonographic identification of EFW over 4000 g at less than 38 weeks was associated with higher correlation between EFW and birth weight than ultrasound performed after 38 weeks (71.5 versus 259.4 g, p < .024). EFW to birth weight correlation was within 1.7% of birth weight for ultrasound performed less than 38 weeks and within 6.5% of birth weight for ultrasound performed at greater than 38 weeks.Conclusions: Identification of EFW with ultrasound performed less than 38 weeks has greater reliability of predicting fetal macrosomia at birth than measurements performed later in gestation. EFW to birth weight correlation was more accurate than previous reports. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]