Search

While medications for anxiety and depression are commonly used in the United States, it is unclear to what degree they are continued during pregnancy. We used a large administrative database to determine whether psychiatric medications are continued during pregnancy and predictors of continued medication treatment. Of 2,672,656 women included in our analysis, 86,454 (3.1%) filled a pre-pregnancy prescription for an anxiolytic or antidepressant medication within 3 months of estimated conception. Of women who filled a pre-pregnancy prescription, 49.4%, 26.1%, and 20.1% filled subsequent prescriptions in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimesters. Discontinuation rates ranged by pharmaceutical agent, from 16% for fluoxetine to 71% for alprazolam. White women and women over 25 were more likely to continue anxiolytic and antidepressant treatment during pregnancy. Because untreated and under-treated mental health conditions are linked to adverse maternal outcomes, high discontinuation rates may have important implications for maternal health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Substance use disorders (SUDs) are increasing in the obstetric population, vary with demographic characteristics, and are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Cannabis use disorder and opioid use disorder are two of the most common SUDs during pregnancy. This study had two objectives. The first objective was to assess trends in any SUD diagnosis during delivery hospitalizations from 2000 to 2018 by maternal age, ZIP code income quartile, and hospital location and teaching status. The second objective was to determine risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes during delivery hospitalizations specifically in the presence of cannabis and opioid use disorder diagnoses. We conducted a serial cross-sectional analysis of the 2000–2018 National Inpatient Sample. Delivery hospitalizations to women aged 15–54 years with substance use disorder diagnoses were identified. SUD included (i) cannabis use disorder; (ii) opioid use disorder; (iii) alcohol use disorder; and (iv) other drug use disorder. We used joinpoint regression to estimate the average annual percent change (AAPC) in any substance use disorder diagnoses with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by (i) ZIP code income quartile, (ii) hospital location and teaching status, and (iii) maternal age. We used unadjusted and adjusted log-linear regression to evaluate the relationship between cannabis use disorder and opioid use disorder several adverse maternal outcomes. We report unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) as measures of effect. From 2000 to 2018, trends analyses broadly demonstrated increasing risk for SUD across demographic categories. In trends analyses stratified by ZIP code-income quartile, the proportion of deliveries with any SUD diagnosis increased across each income quartile with significant increases in the lowest income quartile (AAPC 4.6%, 95% CI 0.4%, 8.9%), second lowest quartile (AAPC 6.3%, 95% CI 5.3%, 7.4%), second highest quartile (AAPC 5.4%, 95% CI 4.1%, 6.8%), and highest quartile (AAPC 4.4%, 95% CI 2.1%, 6.8%). A larger increasing AAPC for SUD was present for deliveries in rural hospitals (AAPC 12.3%, 95% CI 9.8%, 14.9%) as compared to teaching (AAPC 5.7%, 95% CI 5.2%, 6.3%) and non-teaching urban hospitals (AAPC 7.0%, 95% CI 5.9%, 8.1%). By maternal age group, there was a significant larger AAPC for SUD for women aged 15–19 years (AAPC 8.5%, 95% CI 6.6%, 10.4%), 20–24 years (AAPC 9.0%, 95% CI 6.9%, 11.1%) and 25–29 years (AAPC 9.8%, 95% CI 9.1%, 10.6%) than women ≥30 years of age. Cannabis use disorder was associated with increased adjusted risk for preterm delivery (aRR 1.44, 95% CI 1.43, 1.45) and abruption and antepartum hemorrhage (aRR 1.77, 95% CI 1.75, 1.80). Opioid use disorder was associated with risk for non-transfusion severe maternal morbidity (aRR 1.73, 95% CI 1.67, 1.79), preterm delivery (aRR 1.75, 95% CI 1.74, 1.77), and abruption and antepartum hemorrhage (aRR 2.15, 95% CI 2.11, 2.19). While substance use disorders are increasing in pregnancy across rural and urban settings, age groups, and income quartiles, several populations are associated with higher increased risks and trends. These findings support that SUDs are likely to continue to be of public health significance in diverse geographic and demographic settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine which antiepileptic drugs pregnant women receive by trimester. Methods: This retrospective cohort study using the IBM Watson Health MarketScan Research Databases evaluated which antiepileptic drugs pregnant women with epilepsy received by trimester. Women with aged 15–54 years with a history of seizure disorder who underwent a delivery hospitalization between 2008 and 2017 were included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results: Of 34,144 women with a seizure disorder diagnosis and a delivery hospitalization, 10,289 (30.1%) received an anti-epileptic medication during pregnancy of which more than half received lamotrigine or levetiracetam. Other antiepileptic medications used by >5% of the population during any one trimester in the study period included carbamazepine, clonazepam, and topiramate. In evaluating medication use in the 1st trimester versus the 2nd trimester, clonazepam use decreased 32.0% (95% CI 60.0%, 77.0%) from 5.6% to 3.8% of patients receiving antiepileptics from the 1st to the 2nd trimester, gabapentin deceased 22.1% (95% CI 0.68%, 0.90%) from 4.1% to 3.2%, and topiramate decreased 30.0% (95% CI 62.8%, 77.9%) from 7.2% to 5.1%. In comparison, levetiracetam increased from 22.5% to 33.3% between the 1st and 3rd trimester and lamotrigine 22.2% to 27.5% between the 1st and 3rd trimester, 48.3% and 24.0% increases respectively. Conclusion: Antiepileptic drugs with less favorable fetal risk profiles such as topiramate decreased by trimester while medications with more favorable fetal risk profiles such as lamotrigine and levetiracetam increased. These findings broadly support that there are opportunities to improve pre-conceptional counseling of women with epilepsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Data on trends in and implications of unstable housing during pregnancy are limited. The purpose of this study was to address these knowledge gaps. Methods: This repeat cross-sectional study using the National Inpatient Sample analyzed unstable housing diagnoses among 2000–2018 delivery hospitalizations. Joinpoint regression was used to estimate trends in unstable housing by calculating the average annual percent change. Results: From 2000 to 2018, 27,984 delivery hospitalizations had associated diagnoses of unstable housing (0.03%). There was a significant increase in the unstable housing rates, from 0.72 per 10,000 deliveries in 2000 to 12.8 per 10,000 deliveries in 2018. Delivery hospitalizations with unstable housing were at significantly higher risk of antepartum hemorrhage, preterm delivery, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, postpartum hemorrhage, and severe maternal morbidity than those without. Conclusions: This serial cross-sectional analysis of delivery hospitalizations found that the reported prevalence of unstable housing is low but increasing and associated with adverse outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]