Search

Objectives: This was an observational study on cervical length and head perineum distance and the prediction of time of delivery. One-hundred and twenty-five nulliparous women with uncomplicated, term, singleton pregnancy were recruited when they presented to the labor ward with show or infrequent painful uterine contractions (less than three contractions in ten minutes on a 30 min cardiotocogram). Apart from digital vaginal examination to assess cervical length and dilatation, sonographic cervical length and head perineum distance were measured by two-dimensional ultrasound. We compared women who delivered within 72 h of presentation of labor symptoms, with women who did not. After excluding ten women whose labor was induced and delivered within 72 h of presentation, one hundred and fifteen women were included for final data analysis. Main findings: Forty-nine women (42.6%) delivered while sixty-six women (57.4%) remained undelivered at 72 h of presentation of symptoms of labor. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups on age, presence of show, contractions, fetal head station and presentation and mode of delivery. For the group who had delivered within 72 h of presentation of labor symptoms, the mean sonographic cervical length was 1.87 cm ± 0.62 cm, while the head perineum distance was 6.01 cm ± 1.15 cm. For the other group, the mean sonographic cervical length was 2.10 cm ± 0.83 cm; head perineum distance was 6.03 cm ± 1.18 cm. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for both sonographic cervical length (p =.90); and head perineum distance (p =.08). We also compared the cervical length measured by digital vaginal examination versus sonography. The median sonographic measurements were 1.47 cm, 2.11 cm and 2.79 cm at "1 cm," "2 cm" and "3 cm" digital vaginal measurement, respectively. However, there was extensive overlap between digitally and sonographically measured cervical length. Prediction accuracy of cervical length and head perineum distance was poor. The area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 0.433 for sonographic cervical length and 0.501 for HPD. Conclusion: Transperineal sonographical assessment of cervical length and head perineum distance before labor was not useful in predicting the time of delivery. However, it can be explored as an alternative assessment method when digital vaginal examination is not preferred. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To find out whether intrapartum translabial ultrasound examination is painless by comparing pain score of ultrasound-based versus digital vaginal examination of foetal head station.Methods: In 94 women carrying uncomplicated-term singleton pregnancies, labour progress was assessed by translabial ultrasound, followed immediately by conventional digital vaginal examination. Pain scores (0-10) using visual analogue pain scale were obtained for both examinations. Forty-eight and forty-six sets of data were obtained in first and second stage of labour, respectively. The difference in pain scores between digital vaginal examination and translabial ultrasound was analysed.Results: The median pain score for translabial ultrasound was 0 (range 0-8), while that for vaginal examination was 4.5 (range 0-10), p < 0.05. There was no significant difference in pain scores between first and second stages of labour for translabial ultrasound (p = 0.123) and for vaginal examination (p = 0.680). The pain score for vaginal examination was higher than that of translabial ultrasound in 81.9%, similar in 13.8% and lower in 4.3% of cases. There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores obtained for digital vaginal examination by clinicians with different experience (p = 0.941).Conclusions: Intrapartum translabial ultrasound is generally better tolerated than digital vaginal examination for assessment of labour progress, making it an acceptable adjunctive assessment tool during labour. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine any change in adverse neonatal/maternal outcomes after increasing the rate of vaginal twin delivery by comparing vaginal twin delivery and caesarean delivery with our previous cohort study.Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, all twins booked at a Hong Kong regional obstetrics unit were evaluated during a 3-year period from 1 April 2009 to 31 March 2012.Results: Out of the 269 sets of twins who eventually delivered in our unit, 68 (25.3%) of them were delivered vaginally, compared to 15.8% in our previous cohort study (p = 0.02). For those who were suitable for vaginal delivery, significantly more women attempted vaginal delivery: 93/133 (69.9%) versus 47/100 (47%) (p = 0.0005). The success rate for vaginal delivery and rate of requiring caesarean delivery for the 2nd twin were similar between these two periods. There were significantly more 2nd twins with cord blood pH < 7.2 when both twins were delivered by vaginal delivery. Otherwise, there was no significant difference between other neonatal/maternal morbidities.Conclusion: With proper counseling, significantly more women who were suitable for vaginal twin delivery would opt to do so. There was no significant increase in neonatal/maternal morbidities despite the increased rate of vaginal twin delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess whether angle of progression (AOP) and head–perineum distance (HPD) measured by intrapartum transperineal ultrasound (ITU) correlate with clinical fetal head station (station); and whether AOP versus HPD varies during uterine contraction and relaxation. In a subset of primipaorus women, whether these ITU parameters correlate with time to normal spontaneous delivery (TD). Methods: We evaluated prospectively 100 primiparous and multiparous women at term in active labor. Transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound (sagittal and transverse plane) were used to measure fetal head position and ITU parameters, respectively. Digitally palpated station and cervical dilatation were also noted. The results were compared using regression and correlation coefficients. Results: Station was moderately correlated with AOP (r = 0.579) and HPD (r = −0.497). AOP was highly correlated with HPD during uterine contraction (r = −0.703) and relaxation (r = −0.647). In the subgroup of primiparous women, natural log of TD has the highest correlation with HPD and AOP during uterine contraction (r = 0.742), making prediction of TD similar to that of using cervical dilatation. Conclusion: ITU parameters were moderately correlated with station. There was constant high correlation between AOP and HPD. Prediction of TD in primiparous women using ITU parameters was similar to that of using cervical dilatation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. Before April 2006, women with singleton pregnancy and advanced maternal age (AMA, 35 years and older) were offered either direct invasive tests or a variety of screening tests for Down syndrome (DS) with routine anomaly scan at 18–20 weeks. After April 2006, to reduce procedure-related fetal loss, invasive test was performed only for positive screening result or the presence of major fetal anomaly on ultrasound. We reviewed our 2-year experience after the policy change. Methods. Two-year data after policy change were compared to the 1-year historic control before policy change. Results. A total of 2257 eligible women were counselled in the 2 years after policy change. The uptake of screening was 96.7%. The overall detection rate for DS was 90% (18/20) at a false positive rate of 10.9%. The number of invasive tests performed to diagnose one case of DS was reduced 7-fold from 97 to 13. Conclusions. The number of direct invasive tests was markedly reduced. With effective DS screening policy, it is possible to do away with direct invasive testing for the majority of women with AMA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Rapid Aneuploidy Test for Positive Down Screening: Who Is Willing to Pay For It?," by Tsz Kin Lo and colleagues that was published in a previous issue is presented.