Search

Objective: To determine the management of patients with term prelabor rupture of membranes., Methods: Synthesis of the literature from the PubMed and Cochrane databases and the recommendations of French and foreign societies and colleges., Results: Term prelabor rupture of membranes is considered a physiological process until 12 h have passed since rupture (professional consensus). In cases of expectant management and with a low rate of antibiotic prophylaxis, home care may be associated with an increase in neonatal infections (LE3), compared with hospitalization, especially for women with group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization (LE3). Home care is therefore not recommended (grade C). In the absence of spontaneous labor within 12 h of rupture, antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce the risk of maternal intrauterine infection but not of neonatal infection (LE3). Its use after 12 h of rupture in term prelabor rupture of the membranes is therefore recommended (grade C). When antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated, intravenous beta-lactams are recommended (grade C). Induction of labor with oxytocin (LE1), prostaglandin E2 (LE1), or misoprostol (LE1) is associated with shorter rupture-to-delivery intervals than expectant management; immediate induction is not, however, associated with lower rates of neonatal infection (LE1), even among women with a positive GBS vaginal swab (LE2). Thus, expectant management can be offered without increasing the risk of neonatal infection (grade B). Induction of labor is not associated with either an increase or decrease in the cesarean rate (LE2), regardless of parity (LE2) or Bishop score at admission (LE3). Induction can thus be proposed without increasing the risk of cesarean delivery (grade B). No induction method (oxytocin, dinoprostone, misoprostol, or Foley catheter) has demonstrated superiority over any another method for reducing rates of intrauterine or neonatal infection or of cesarean delivery or for shortening the rupture-to-delivery intervals, regardless of parity or the Bishop score., Conclusion: Term prelabor rupture of membranes is a frequent event. A 12-hour interval without onset of spontaneous labor was chosen to differentiate a physiological condition from a potentially unsafe situation that justifies antibiotic prophylaxis. Expectant management or induction of labor can each be proposed, even in case of positive screening for group streptococcus. The decision should depend on the woman's wishes and maternity unit organization (professional consensus).

Purpose: Our trial aimed to assess the effectiveness of amnioinfusion for a second attempt at external cephalic version (ECV)., Material and Methods: This open randomized controlled trial was planned with a sequential design. Women at a term ≥36 weeks of gestation with a singleton fetus in breech presentation and a first unsuccessful ECV were recruited in two level-3 maternity units. They were randomly allocated to transabdominal amnioinfusion with a 500-mL saline solution under ultrasound surveillance or no amnioinfusion before the second ECV attempt. Trained senior obstetricians performed all procedures. The primary outcome was the cephalic presentation rate at delivery. Analyses were conducted according to intention to treat (NCT00465712)., Result: Recruitment difficulties led to stopping the trial after a 57-month period, 119 women were randomized: 59 allocated to amnioinfusion + ECV and 60 to ECV only. Data were analyzed without applying the sequential feature of the design. The rate of cephalic presentation at delivery did not differ significantly according to whether the second version attempt was or was not preceded by amnioinfusion (20 versus 12%, p = .20). Premature rupture of the membranes occurred for 15% of the women in the amnioinfusion group., Conclusion: Amnioinfusion before a second attempt to external version does not significantly increase the rate of cephalic presentation at delivery.

Objective: The study aims to evaluate the accuracy of combining uterine artery Doppler (UAD), PlGF and sFlt-1 in the first trimester for preeclampsia screening., Methods: Prospectively enrolled women at high risk of preeclampsia were included. Transabdominal UAD measurements and serum biomarkers were collected between 11 and 13 weeks of gestation in three university hospitals and in one general hospital. The main outcome was preeclampsia. UAD parameters and biomarker levels among women with preeclampsia were compared with those of women in the unaffected group in univariate and multivariate analyses., Results: Out of 226 women included from May 2007 to January 2011, 27 (11.9%) women developed preeclampsia. Among women affected by preeclampsia, the lowest pulsatility index was higher (p = 0.02), bilateral notching was more frequent (p = 0.01), and PlGF was lower (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed for other indicators. The multivariate model, adjusted for laboratory and sonographic indicators, had an area under the curve (AUC) estimated at 0.76, which was not significantly different from the AUC of the univariate model adjusted only for PlGF (p = 0.7)., Conclusion: In a high-risk population, PlGF in the first trimester is useful for predicting preeclampsia, but neither sFlt-1 nor any UAD indices improved the prediction of preeclampsia.