Search

The present work aims to evaluate expansive soil stabilization using different additives. Twenty soil mixtures consisting of 10%, 20%, 25%, and 30% zeolitic tuff (ZT) with 2%, 4%, and 6% lime in various combinations were used to stabilize the soil for pavement subbase application. A comprehensive test program, including Atterberg's limits, compaction, unconfined compression strength (UCS), California Bearing Ratio (CBR), resilient modulus, and permanent deformation, was performed on natural and stabilized soil specimens. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) supplied with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDX) was used to confirm the study findings. Adding ZT increases the availability of the silica and alumina needed for the pozzolanic reaction; test results revealed that adding ZT increases the maximum dry unit weight, CBR, UCS, resilient modulus, decreases plasticity, and permanent deformation. As such, ZT can improve the physical and mechanical properties of lime-stabilized soil as a pavement's subgrade and subbase layers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Plastic clays in subgrade may cause major engineering defects such as excessive heave or settlement during the wet season that contribute to the formation of uneven geometry at the pavement surface. Soil stabilization is often a requisite to ameliorate the engineering properties of soft soils or reactive clays. This study investigates the application of nano-silica and nano-alumina to improve the California bearing ratio (CBR) of a local clay. The clay was treated with cement (2%–8%), with nano-additive (0.1%–1.5%) and with cement and nano-additive (3% cement + 0.1%–1.5% nano-additive). The compacted sample was cured for 7 days and subjected to soaked and unsoaked CBR tests. The soaked CBR of the nontreated clay increased by 49% and 27% for 1% nano-silica and 1% nano-alumina treated clay, respectively. Although 3% cement addition improved the CBR of the soaked clay by 28%, the combination of 3% cement with 1% nano-silica and nano-alumina resulted in 196% and 164% increase in the soaked CBR of the nontreated clay, respectively. The combination of nano-additives and cement yielded the same soaked CBR as if 6%–7% cement would have been used. Clay treated with 1% nano-silica and 3% cement achieved the highest CBR value within the tested samples and the sample treated with 1% nano-alumina and 3% cement achieved the lowest free swell potential. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of the treated clay showed the formation of uniform fabric with fewer pore spaces and calcium silicate hydrate (CSH)/calcium aluminate hydrate (CAH) products within the fabric of nano-additive treated clay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many techniques, most notably soil stabilization, have been developed to enhance soil characteristics due to the growing trend of constructing structures on clayey soils. Therefore, it is imperative that researchers address clay-related issues utilizing geotechnical engineering achievements. This study evaluated the effect of volcanic ash (tuff) as a natural pozzolan on the improvement of cement performance in the clay stabilization. Various compositions of cement (0%–6% by dry mass) and tuff (0%–20% by dry mass) were added to clay and cured for 7 and 28 days. Then a set of tests, including modified Proctor, Atterberg limits, electrical conductivity (EC), pH, unconstrained compressive strength (UCS), California bearing ratio (CBR), wet-dry durability, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses, were performed on the untreated and treated samples. The secant modulus (E50) was measured to evaluate the stiffness of the specimens. The data showed that the incorporation of tuff into the studied cement-stabilized clay considerably enhanced the mixture mechanical properties and substantially reduced the plasticity index of the samples. After a 28-day period, the samples containing 6% cement and 15% tuff, as the optimum mixture, had increases of the UCS and CBR values of approximately twice those containing 6% cement. Moreover, the inclusion of tuff into the cement–soil blends increased the durability of the samples. According to the SEM and XRD analysis, the addition of tuff to the samples containing cement caused the formation of more cementitious compounds and fully changed the soil structure. The findings indicate that the use of tuff can lead to improved cement performance in the stabilization process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]