Search

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the measurements of fractional flow reserve of the myocardium (FFRmyo) with results of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and stress single-photon emission computed tomography thallium-201 (SPECT 201Tl) imaging in patients with intermediate-severity coronary artery disease (ISCAD)., Methods: We prospectively evaluated 40 lesions of QCA-determined ISCAD in 30 patients (age, 53.3 +/- 10.2 years; 67% male) using a 0. 014 inch pressure wire during elective coronary angiography and compared the results with those of SPECT 201Tl performed within a week of angiography., Results: There was a moderate negative correlation between percent diameter stenosis (%DS) and FFRmyo (53.1 +/- 13.4% and 0.75 +/- 0.09, respectively; r = -0.40; p = 0.01). Twenty-two out of 40 vascular territories (55%) were found to have perfusion defects (Group 1) and 18 territories (45%) were found to be normal (Group 2). While QCA-determined stenosis severity was not different between Group 1 and Group 2 (56 +/- 12% vs. 50 +/- 16%, respectively; p = 0.3), FFRmyo was found to be significantly different between the two groups (0.68 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.83 +/- 0.05, respectively; p = 0.001). When %DS and FFRmyo results were dichotomized as abnormal by 50% and < 0.75, respectively, and SPECT 201Tl was taken as the gold standard, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of %DS and FFRmyo were 0.55 vs. 0.91, 0.56 vs. 1.0, 0.60 vs. 1.0 and 0.50 vs. 0. 90, respectively., Conclusion: While FFRmyo seems to accurately predict the presence of ischemia on SPECT 201Tl in patients with ISCAD, QCA does not reliably assess the physiologic impact of the same lesions.

Myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFRmyo) has been demonstrated to be a useful method for determining the physiologic importance of a given coronary lesion. However, the reliability of the FFRmyo measurement is unknown in infarct-related arteries (IRA). The aim of this study was to measure and correlate the FFRmyo results of 14 consecutive patients who had recent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (Group 1) with 14 consecutive patients who didnOt have AMI (Group 2) before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and FFRmyo measurements were determined both before and after optimal PTCA for all patients. FFRmyo was measured by use of a 0.014 inch guidewire as the ratio of the pressure distal to the target lesion to the aortic pressure taken during the maximal hyperemia induced by intracoronary adenosine. There were no differences between the two groups related to gender, target artery reference diameter, minimal luminal diameter and percent diameter stenosis of the vessel both before and after PTCA. While FFRmyo results after PTCA were not different between the groups, they were statistically different before PTCA (Group 1: 77.6+/-5.4%, Group 2: 63.3+/-8.4%; p<0.001). Although QCA-determined percent diameter stenosis revealed a significant degree of stenosis (66.5+/-10.5%) for Group 1, FFRmyo values were higher than 75% (77.6+/-5.4%), indicating insignificant stenosis. Thus, it was concluded that FFRmyo measurements before PTCA were significantly different between IRA and non-IRA and that the method may not be valid for the determination of stenosis significance in IRA.