Search

Objective: Simple unconventional indices did not demonstrate a satisfactory accuracy for diagnosing unilateral primary aldosteronism when adrenal vein sampling is not bilaterally selective. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of clinical/imaging-corrected unconventional indices for adrenal vein sampling in predicting unilateral primary aldosteronism., Methods: Data of all consecutive patients with primary aldosteronism subtyped with adrenal vein sampling, referred to two Italian centers, were analyzed retrospectively. All patients with proved unilateral aldosterone hypersecretion underwent adrenalectomy., Results: Unilateral disease was diagnosed in 58 cases (54.2%) and idiopathic hyperaldosteronism in 49 individuals (45.8%). The monoadrenal index (aldosterone-to-cortisol ratio in the adrenal vein) showed high accuracy in predicting ipsilateral disease and moderate accuracy in predicting contralateral aldosterone hypersecretion. The monolateral index (aldosterone-to-cortisol ratio in the adrenal vein vs. peripheral blood) revealed moderate accuracy in predicting ipsilateral disease and high accuracy in predicting contralateral aldosterone hypersecretion. Lesion side- and hypokalemia-corrected ROC curves for these unconventional indices revealed a significant improvement in the reliability of predicting ipsilateral/contralateral disease, reaching high accuracy in all models. For an immediate clinical application of our results, the adjusted cut-offs were calculated, according to the Youden's criterion and to a pre-established specificity of 95%, for all possible combinations of lesion side at imaging and presence/absence of hypokalemia., Conclusion: This study demonstrated the high diagnostic accuracy of clinical-/imaging-corrected unconventional indices for adrenal vein sampling in the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism subtypes and suggests the use of these adjusted indices to select patients for adrenalectomy when adrenal vein sampling is not bilaterally selective., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To assess the prevalence of primary aldosteronism and its association with cardiometabolic complications in patients with resistant and refractory hypertension., Methods: One hundred and ten consecutive patients with true resistant hypertension [insufficient blood pressure control despite appropriate lifestyle measures and treatment with at least three classes of antihypertensive medication, including a diuretic] and without previous cardiovascular events were screened for secondary hypertension. Refractory hypertension was diagnosed in case of uncontrolled blood pressure despite the use of at least five antihypertensive drugs., Results: Primary aldosteronism was diagnosed in 32 cases (29.1%). The multivariate analysis showed that primary aldosteronism is a strong factor positively associated with left ventricular hypertrophy [odds ratio (OR) = 12.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.82-60.88; P < 0.001], microalbuminuria (OR = 3.67, 95% CI 1.44-9.78; P = 0.007), carotid intima-media thickness at least 0.9 mm (OR = 2.69, 95% CI 1.02-7.82; P = 0.037), aortic ectasia (OR = 4.08, 95% CI 1,18-15.04; P = 0.027) and atrial fibrillation (OR 8.80, 95% CI 1.53-73.98; P = 0.022). Moreover, primary aldosteronism was independently associated with the presence of at least one (OR = 8.60, 95% CI 1.73-69.88; P = 0.018) and at least two types of organ damage (OR = 3.08, 95% CI 1.19-8.24; P = 0.022). Thirteen patients (11.8%) were affected by refractory hypertension. This group was characterized by significantly higher values of carotid intima-media thickness, higher rate of aldosterone-producing adenoma and atrial fibrillation, compared with the other individuals with resistant hypertension., Conclusion: The current study indicates that primary aldosteronism is a frequent cause of secondary hypertension and cardiovascular complications among patients with resistant and refractory hypertension, suggesting a crucial role of aldosterone in the pathogenesis of severe hypertensive phenotypes and cardiovascular disease.

Introduction: Recent randomized controlled trials have confirmed the ability of renal denervation to lower blood pressure (BP) in patients, resistant to the BP-lowering effect of multiple antihypertensive drug administration. Evidence is limited, however, in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and haemodialysis, a condition in which a persistent BP elevation, despite administration of many antihypertensive drugs, is common. Aim of the present study was to test the BP-lowering efficacy of renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension and ESRD on haemodialysis. BP was measured repeatedly in the office and over the 24 h during 1-year follow-up., Methods and Results: The study was conducted from February 2017 to January 2018 at the Policlinico of Monza, Monza, Italy. We included 24 men and women aged at least 20 years (mean 55 ± 16) who had ESRD, were on long-term haemodialysis and exhibited resistant hypertension, that is, elevated office and ambulatory BP values, despite multidrug antihypertensive treatment (n = 5.4 ± 1). We excluded patients with renal artery stenosis, malignancy, and a probable life expectancy less than 1 year. Twelve patients were included in the renal denervation and 12 in the medical treatment (control) group. All patients underwent office and 24 h ambulatory BP measurements at baseline and at 1, 6 and 12 months during the follow-up. In the renal denervation group, baseline office and 24 h mean SBP were 180 ± 112 and 175 ± 11 mmHg, respectively, the corresponding values in the control group being 181 ± 19 and 181 ± 20 mmHg. Most of the other baseline characteristics were also similar or only slightly different between groups, including the mean number of administered antihypertensive drugs at baseline. SBP showed an early and persistent reduction after renal denervation (office SBP: 165 ± 13; 150 ± 7 and 149 ± 11mmHg; 24 h SBP 163 ± 20, 148 ± 10 and 149 ± 17 mmHg after 1, 6 and 12 months, respectively). The BP-lowering effect was almost always present and statistically significant during both the day and night. DBP changes followed a similar pattern whereas heart rate never showed any significant change. No significant periprocedural complication of renal denervation was seen. The mean number of administered drugs did not show any significant BP change during the study., Conclusion: In ESRD patients under long-term haemodialysis in whom BP was markedly elevated despite administration of many antihypertensive drugs, renal denervation lowered both ambulatory and office BP. The reduction persisted over a 1-year follow-up.