Search

Objectives: Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) control is worse in men compared with women with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and this may partially explain the faster CKD progression in men. This is the first study investigating possible sex differences in prevalence, control and phenotypes of hypertension in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with office-BP and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM)., Methods: This cross-sectional study included 136 male and 69 female stable KTRs who underwent office-BP measurements and 24-h ABPM. Hypertension thresholds for office and ambulatory BP were defined according to the 2017 ACC/AHA and 2021 KDIGO guidelines for KTRs., Results: Age, time from transplantation, eGFR and history of major comorbidities did not differ between groups. Office SBP/DBP levels were insignificantly higher in men than women (130.3 ± 16.3/77.3 ± 9.4 vs. 126.4 ± 17.8/74.9 ± 11.5 mmHg; P = 0.118/0.104) but daytime SBP/DBP was significantly higher in men (128.5 ± 12.1/83.0 ± 8.2 vs. 124.6 ± 11.9/80.3 ± 9.3 mmHg; P = 0.032/P = 0.044). No significant between-group differences were detected for night-time BP. The prevalence of hypertension was similar by office-BP criteria (93.4 vs. 91.3%; P = 0.589), but higher in men than women with ABPM (100 vs. 95.7%; P = 0.014). The use of ACEIs/ARBs and CCBs was more common in men. Office-BP control was similar (43.3 vs. 44.4%, P = 0.882), but 24-h control was significantly lower in men than women (16.9 vs. 30.3%; P = 0.029). White-coat hypertension was similar (5.1 vs. 7.6%; P = 0.493), whereas masked hypertension was insignificantly more prevalent in men than women (35.3 vs. 24.2%; P = 0.113)., Conclusion: BP levels, hypertension prevalence and control are similar by office criteria but significantly different by ABPM criteria between male and female KTRs. Worse ambulatory BP control in male compared with female KTRs may interfere with renal and cardiovascular outcomes., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Hypertension is highly prevalent and independently associated with adverse outcomes in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Volume overload is the main mechanism of increased blood pressure (BP) in these individuals. This study examines the long-term effects of dry-weight reduction with a standardized lung-ultrasound (US)-guided strategy on ambulatory BP in hypertensive hemodialysis patients., Methods: This is the report of the 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial in 71 clinically euvolemic, hemodialysis patients with hypertension. Patients were randomized to dry-weight reduction guided by prehemodialysis lung ultrasound and to standard care. A 48-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed in all study participants at baseline and after 12 months., Results: During follow-up, a greater proportion of patients in the active group underwent dry-weight reduction compared with the control group (71.4% vs. 22.2%; P < 0.001). The number of lung US-B lines (a metric of lung water) reduced in the active (-4.83 ± 13.73) and increased in the control arm (+5.53 ± 16.01; P = 0.005) paralleling dry-weight changes (-1.68 ± 2.38 vs. 0.54 ± 2.32 kg; P < 0.001). At 12 months, 48-h systolic BP (136.19 ± 14.78 vs. 130.31 ± 13.57 mmHg; P = 0.034) and diastolic BP (80.72 ± 9.83 vs. 76.82 ± 8.97 mmHg; P = 0.008) were lower compared to baseline in the active but similar in the control group. Changes in 48-h systolic BP (-7.78 ± 13.29 vs. -0.10 ± 14.75 mmHg; P = 0.021) were significantly greater in the active compared to the control group. The proportion of patients experiencing ≥1 episode of intradialytic hypotension was nominally lower in the active group (71.4% vs. 88.9%, P = 0.065)., Conclusions: Lung-US-guided dry-weight reduction can effectively and safely decrease ambulatory BP levels in the long-term., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major issue of public health. Hypertension control and use of renin--angiotensin system (RAS) blockers are the cornerstones of treatment for CKD of any cause. However, even under optimal RAS blockade, many individuals will progress towards more advanced CKD. Within the past few years, evidence from cardiovascular outcome trials with sodium--glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors clearly suggested that these agents substantially delay CKD progression in patients with diabetes mellitus on top of standard-of-care treatment. The Canagliflozin-and-Renal-Events-in-Diabetes-with-Established-Nephropathy-Clinical-Evaluation (CREDENCE) study, showed that canagliflozin substantially reduced the risk of doubling of SCr, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), or death from renal or cardiovascular causes in 4401 patients with diabetic CKD compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.70; 95% CI 0.59-0.82). Recently, the Study-to-Evaluate-the-Effect-of-Dapagliflozin-on-Renal-Outcomes-and-Cardiovascular-Mortality-in-Patients-With-Chronic-Kidney-Disease (DAPA-CKD), including 2510 patients with diabetic and 1803 with nondiabetic CKD, also showed an impressive reduction in the risk of ≥50% decline in eGFR, ESKD, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.51-0.72). The benefit was similar for patients with diabetic and nondiabetic CKD, including patients with glomerulonephritides. Following this conclusive evidence, relevant guidelines should accommodate their recommendations to implement treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors for patients with diabetic and nondiabetic CKD., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)