Search

Older patients experience higher rates of cardiovascular disease than younger patients, but may be undertreated with statins due to doubts about efficacy and safety. The Lipid-Lowering Arm of the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial allowed an evaluation of the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin among older (≥ 65 years) and younger (65 years) patients with hypertension.A total of 10 305 patients with hypertension, at least three other cardiovascular risk factors, total cholesterol concentrations of 251 mg/dl or less, and no known coronary heart disease (CHD) were randomized to receive atorvastatin 10 mg or placebo. The primary endpoint was a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction and fatal CHD.There were 4445 patients in the older group (mean 71 years) and 5860 patients (mean 57 years) in the younger group. Among those taking placebo, the older group experienced a higher rate of primary endpoints than the younger group (11.7 vs. 7.6 events per 1000 patient years, respectively). After a median follow-up of 3.3 years, the primary endpoint was reduced by a similar proportion in both older and younger patients (37 vs. 33%, respectively). Although older patients reported more serious adverse events than younger patients, there were no significant differences between atorvastatin and placebo within each age group.Atorvastatin reduced the risk of major cardiovascular events to a similar relative extent in both older and younger patients with treated hypertension. However, given that event rates were higher in older patients, the absolute benefits of atorvastatin were greater for older than younger patients.

Older patients experience higher rates of cardiovascular disease than younger patients, but studies have suggested that relative risk reductions due to antihypertensive therapy are lower in older than younger patients. The Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA) allowed an evaluation of the efficacy and safety of an amlodipine versus an atenolol-based antihypertensive regimen among older (≥ 65 years) and younger (65 years) patients.In ASCOT-BPLA 19 257 patients (8137 aged ≥ 65 years and 11 02065 years) were randomly assigned to receive amlodipine or atenolol-based antihypertensive therapy. The primary endpoint (nonfatal myocardial infarction and fatal coronary heart disease) and seven secondary endpoints were consistent with the original trial design.All cardiovascular endpoints evaluated favoured the amlodipine-based regimen, significantly so in seven of the 16 age-stratified endpoints. Compared with the atenolol-based regimen, the amlodipine-based regimen reduced the relative risk of cardiovascular events by 17% in older and 15% in younger patients (P0.01). Overall, older patients experienced more cardiovascular events [n = 1625 (20%)] than younger patients [n = 1339 (12%)]. Discontinuations due to serious adverse events were low in both age groups and less frequent in the amlodipine-based versus atenolol-based regimen: 0.6 versus 1.1% among older patients and 0.4 versus 0.8% among younger patients.The amlodipine-based regimen reduced the relative risk of cardiovascular events more effectively than the atenolol-based regimen in both older and younger patients. However, because event rates were higher among older patients, the absolute benefits were greater for older compared with younger patients.

Results of the Anglo-Scandinavian cardiac outcomes trial-blood pressure lowering arm (ASCOT-BPLA) showed significantly lower rates of coronary and stroke events in individuals allocated an amlodipine-perindopril combination drug regimen than in those allocated an atenolol-thiazide combination drug regimen. The aims of the ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) substudy of ASCOT were to examine the impact of the two blood pressure (BP)- lowering regimens on ambulatory pressures, test to what extent the between-treatment differences in cardiovascular outcome could be attributed to differences in ABP and assess whether ABP provides predictive information additional to that of clinic blood pressure (CBP) in treated hypertensive patients.One thousand, nine hundred and five patients from four ASCOT centres had repeated ABPs performed over a median follow-up period of 5.5 years. As in the whole ASCOT population, CBP values were lower in amlodipine-perindopril-treated patients compared with those treated with atenolol-thiazide [between-regimen difference [95% confidence intervals (CIs)]]: [-1.5 (-2.4 to -0.5)/-1.2 (-1.8 to +0.5) mmHg]. Daytime BP during follow-up was higher in patients treated with amlodipine-perindopril therapy [+1.1 (0.1-2.1)/+1.6 (0.8-2.3) mmHg]; night-time systolic, but not diastolic BP, was lower in patients treated with amlodipine-perindopril therapy [-2.2 (-3.4 to +0.9)/+0.8 (0.0-1.6) mmHg]. The relative risk of a cardiovascular event associated with a 1 SD increment in accumulated mean BP was 1.35 (1.18-1.53) for clinic systolic BP, 1.30 (1.14-1.49) for daytime systolic BP and 1.42 (1.24-1.62) for night-time systolic BP. With adjustment for baseline variables, treatment regimen and clinic systolic BP, the hazard ratios were 1.17 (1.00-1.36) and 1.25 (1.08-1.47) for daytime and night-time systolic BP, respectively. The between-regimen adjusted hazard ratio for cardiovascular events (amlodipine-perindopril therapy versus atenolol-thiazide therapy) was 0.74 (0.55-1.01) and increased to 0.81 (0.60-1.10) after further adjustment for clinic systolic BP. Further, adjustment for night-time systolic BP increased the hazard ratio to 0.85 (0.62-1.16).The amlodipine-perindopril and atenolol-thiazide regimens had different effects on daytime and night-time ABP, which may have contributed to the lower rates of events in patients treated with amlodipine-perindopril therapy. Both CBP and ABP were significantly associated with rates of cardiovascular events. ABP nocturnal pressures provided complimentary and incremental utility over CBP in the prediction of cardiovascular risk in treated hypertensive patients. These data support the use of ABP to assess the effect of antihypertensive treatment in clinical practice.