ISI Document Delivery No.: 533YK Times Cited: 17 Cited Reference Count: 48 Cited References: ALLASIA DG, 2006, LARGE BASIN SIMULATI, V303, P360 Beven K., 1995, Computer models of watershed hydrology., P627 Birkett CM, 2002, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V107, DOI 10.1029/2001JD000609 Birkett CM, 1998, WATER RESOUR RES, V34, P1223, DOI 10.1029/98WR00124 Bjerklie DM, 2003, J HYDROL, V278, P17, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00129-X CALMANT S, 2006, THEMATIC ISSUE OBSER, V14, P1113 Calmant S, 2008, SURV GEOPHYS, V29, P247, DOI 10.1007/s10712-008-9051-1 Campos ID, 2001, CR ACAD SCI II A, V333, P633 Coe M. T., 2004, Water Resources Research, V40, pW10205, DOI 10.1029/2003WR002543 Collischonn B, 2008, J HYDROL, V360, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.07.032 Collischonn W, 2007, HYDROLOG SCI J, V52, P878, DOI 10.1623/hysj.52.5.878 Villar JCE, 2009, J HYDROL, V375, P297, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.004 Farr TG, 2007, REV GEOPHYS, V45, DOI 10.1029/2005RG000183 Fekete BM, 2001, WATER RESOUR RES, V37, P1955, DOI 10.1029/2001WR900024 Frappart F, 2006, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V100, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2005.10.027 Getirana ACV, 2009, HYDROL PROCESS, V23, P2316, DOI 10.1002/hyp.7303 Getirana ACV, 2009, HYDROL PROCESS, V23, P502, DOI 10.1002/hyp.7167 Graham ST, 1999, WATER RESOUR RES, V35, P583, DOI 10.1029/1998WR900068 Hasler N, 2007, J HYDROMETEOROL, V8, P380, DOI 10.1175/JHM587.1 Jaccon G., 1989, CURVA CHAVE ANALISE, P273 JENSON SK, 1988, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V54, P1593 Kouraev AV, 2004, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V93, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2004.07.007 KOUWEN N, 1993, J WATER RES PL-ASCE, V119, P289, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1993)119:3(289) Krysanova V, 1998, ECOL MODEL, V106, P261, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(97)00204-4 LeFavour G, 2005, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V32, DOI 10.1029/2005GL023836 LEMOINE F, 1998, TM1998206861 NASA GO LEON JG, 2006, HYDROLOGY EARTH SY D, V3, P3023 Leon JG, 2006, J HYDROL, V328, P481, DOI 10.1016/j.hydrol/2005.12.006 Liang X, 1994, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V99, P14415, DOI 10.1029/94JD00483 WMO, 1994, 168 WMO, V168 Martinez JM, 2007, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V108, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.012 Nash J. E., 1970, J HYDROL, V10, P282, DOI DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 NETO AR, 2005, P 7 IAHS SCI ASS Nijssen B, 1997, WATER RESOUR RES, V33, P711, DOI 10.1029/96WR03517 Ponce V.M., 1989, ENG HYDROLOGY PRINCI Reed SM, 2003, WATER RESOUR RES, V39, DOI 10.1029/2003WR001989 Roads J, 2002, J HYDROMETEOROL, V3, P227, DOI 10.1175/1525-7541(2002)0032.0.CO;2 ROUX E, HYDROLOGICA IN PRESS Roux E, 2008, HYDROLOG SCI J, V53, P81, DOI 10.1623/hysj.53.1.81 Schaefli B, 2007, HYDROL PROCESS, V21, P2075, DOI 10.1002/hyp.6825 Shaw D, 2005, J HYDROL, V307, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.09.019 Shuttleworth W.J., 1993, HDB HYDROLOGY Tomasella J, 2008, HYDROL PROCESS, V22, P2133, DOI 10.1002/hyp.6813 TUCCI CEM, 2005, ANEELWMO9800 *UN FAO, 1986, GRIDD FAO UNESCO SOI VOROSMARTY C, 1999, NASA POST 2002 LAND, P53 WIGMOSTA MS, 1994, WATER RESOUR RES, V30, P1665, DOI 10.1029/94WR00436 Zakharova EA, 2006, CR GEOSCI, V338, P188, DOI 10.1016/j.crte.205.10.003 Getirana, Augusto C. V. Bonnet, Marie-Paule Calmant, Stephane Roux, Emmanuel Rotunno Filho, Otto C. Mansur, Webe J. Getirana, Augusto/G-4630-2011; ROUX, Emmanuel/G-9814-2011 CNPq; CAPES [516/05] The authors would like to thank CNPq and CAPES (Project 516/05) in Brazil for financial support. This work is part of the ANR program (TCCYFLAM) and the CNPq/IRD joint research program. The authors would like to acknowledge the Centre de Topographie des Oceans et de l'Hydrosphere (CTOH) at LEGOS for providing the ENVISAT dataset and also the Agencia Nacional de Aguas (ANA) for making available hydrological data. The authors also acknowledge the helpful suggestions of an anonymous reviewer. 17 ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV AMSTERDAM J HYDROL; The main objective of this study is to take advantage of spatial altimetry data to help monitoring river discharges in poorly gauged basins. A methodology is defined to obtain high accuracy relationships between water levels provided by spatial altimetry and water discharge computed by a hydrological model. The proposed method is based on a distributed rainfall-runoff model calibrated and validated against a few in situ data. Discharge is modeled in a daily time step at river locations tracked by the satellite and combined with water height observations to produce rating curves. The methodology is evaluated in the Northern Amazon basin, corresponding to the upper part of the Branco River basin, the major tributary of the Negro River. The MGB-IPH (an acronym from the Portuguese for Large Basins Model and Institute of Hydraulic Research) is run for a 10-year period, from January 1997 to December 2006, in a daily time step. Eight gauge stations are used to calibrate and validate the model, resulting in Nash-Sutcliffe coefficients from 0.47 (Maloca do Contao station - 5896 km(2)) to 0.85 (Caracarai station 126,085 km(2)) in the calibration process, and 0.42 (Posto Funai station - 9708 km(2)) to 0.94 (also at Caracarai station) in the validation process. Results suggest the existence of relations between model accuracy and the size of drainage areas, which can be firstly attributed to a poor rainfall monitoring and also to model restrictions. which was specially developed to large basins. Water level time series (35-day time step) at 12 virtual stations (VS) are deduced from ENVISAT tracks from October 2002 to November 2006. The rating curve parameters, including the zero-flow depth (h), are estimated by fitting a power-law relation between modeled discharges and satellite-derived water altimetry. Zero-flow depths are optimized for each VS in order to define the best fitted curve. Additionally, slopes along reaches where two or more VS's are defined can be provided. Comparisons between daily water discharges provided by in situ observations and rating curve estimates at three VS's resulted in RMS errors from 9.9% to 26.9%, which are in accordance with previous experiences and acceptable for most hydrological applications. River bed slopes derived from both ENVISAT and SRTM were compared. Results suggest that altimetric data provide more accurate slopes and it should be preferred whenever it is available. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.