1. Female cancer survivors are more likely to be at high risk of malnutrition and meet the threshold for clinical importance for a number of quality of life subscales.
- Author
-
Keaver, Laura, O'Callaghan, Niamh, O'Sullivan, Aoibheann, Quinn, Laoise, Loftus, Amy, and McHugh, Catherine M.
- Subjects
GRIP strength ,EXERCISE tests ,MUSCLE contraction ,ANALYSIS of variance ,ANTHROPOMETRY ,CANCER patients ,MALNUTRITION ,QUALITY of life ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,CHI-squared test ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,BODY mass index ,BREAST tumors ,DISEASE risk factors - Abstract
Background: The present study aimed to explore malnutrition risk, handgrip strength and quality of life (QOL) in cancer survivors. Methods: In total, 232 individuals completed a demographic questionnaire, Patient‐Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ‐C30). Handgrip strength was determined using a spring‐loaded handgrip dynamometer and anthropometric measurements were taken by an oncology nurse. Frequencies and distribution data, analysis of variance and chi‐squared tests were then conducted. Results: The majority of the cohort were female (n = 141; 60.8%) had breast cancer (n = 62; 26.7%) and the mean ± SD body mass index (BMI) was 26.6 ± 6.2 kg m–2. Less than a one‐third reported seeing a dietitian (n = 68; 29.3%). Over one‐third reported recent weight loss (n = 88; 37.3%). Some 40.9% (n = 95) were at moderate to high risk of malnutrition, with women more likely than men to be classified as high risk (p < 0.05). Mean ± SD handgrip strength was 25 ± 15 kg and this differed significantly by gender (p = 0.00), cancer type (p = 0.01) and BMI classification (p = 0.01). One‐fifth of individuals were classified as having dynapenia (n = 48; 21.1%). Median (interquartile range) QOL score was 66.7 (33.3). The proportion of individuals meeting the threshold for clinical importance for QOL subscales ranged from 12.5% (constipation) to 42.7% (physical functioning). Females were more likely than males to meet the threshold for physical functioning (p = 0.00), fatigue (p = 0.02) and pain (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Females are more likely than males to be at high risk of malnutrition and meet the threshold for clinical significance for several QOL subscales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF