1. Secondary prevention of ischemic stroke: Challenging patient scenarios
- Author
-
David M. Brown, Saad Rahman, David Krakow, Daniel D. Dressler, Alpesh Amin, Kiwon Lee, David Likosky, and Dara G. Jamieson
- Subjects
Aortic arch ,Secondary prevention ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Ejection fraction ,Leadership and Management ,business.industry ,Health Policy ,Context (language use) ,General Medicine ,Assessment and Diagnosis ,medicine.disease ,Hospital medicine ,Coronary artery disease ,Stenosis ,Internal medicine ,medicine.artery ,Cardiology ,Medicine ,Fundamentals and skills ,cardiovascular diseases ,business ,Intensive care medicine ,Care Planning ,Stroke - Abstract
The risk for recurrent stroke following a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) is high. Prevention of a secondary event is a priority, as the associated morbidity and mortality are great. Antiplatelet agents have been shown to reduce this risk, but the choice of treatment modality depends on a number of factors, including the underlying cause of the stroke and the patient's comorbidities. For example, a cardioembolic stroke is best treated with anticoagulants, whereas one of noncardioembolic origin requires antiplatelet therapy. A number of challenging patient scenarios are explored in this article, and appropriate medical management is discussed, with the goal of examining the most recent trial data and information in the context of an actual case. Eight sample cases are presented: stroke prevention in a patient with recent stent placement, low ejection fraction, intracranial stenosis, carotid stenosis, atherosclerosis of the aortic arch, symptomatic coronary artery disease, antiplatelet failure, and stroke prevention in a patient already on warfarin. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2008;3(4 Suppl):S20–S28. © 2008 Society of Hospital Medicine.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF