Search

Background: Prevention of bile duct injury and vasculo-biliary injury while performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is an unsolved problem. Clarifying the surgical difficulty using intraoperative findings can greatly contribute to the pursuit of best practices for acute cholecystitis. In this study, multiple evaluators assessed surgical difficulty items in unedited videos and then constructed a proposed surgical difficulty grading., Methods: We previously assembled a library of typical video clips of the intraoperative findings for all LC surgical difficulty items in acute cholecystitis. Fifty-one experts on LC assessed unedited surgical videos. Inter-rater agreement was assessed by Fleiss's κ and Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC)., Results: Except for one item ("edematous change"), κ or AC exceeded 0.5, so the typical videos were judged to be applicable. The conceivable surgical difficulty gradings were analyzed. According to the assessment of difficulty factors, we created a surgical difficulty grading system (agreement probability = 0.923, κ = 0.712, 90% CI: 0.587-0.837; AC 2  = 0.870, 90% CI: 0.768-0.972)., Conclusion: The previously published video clip library and our novel surgical difficulty grading system should serve as a universal objective tool to assess surgical difficulty in LC., (© 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

Background: To explore best practices for acute cholecystitis, it is necessary to construct a system to assess the difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) based on intraoperative findings. In this study, multiple evaluators assessed videos of LC to assemble a library of typical video clips for 25 intraoperative findings., Methods: We have previously identified 25 items that contribute to surgical difficulty in LC. For each item, roughly 30-second video clips were submitted from videos of LC performed at member institutions. We then selected one typical video from the collected clips based on simple tabulation of the instances of agreement. Inter-rater agreement was assessed with Fleiss's κ and Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC)., Results: Except in the case of two assessment items ("edematous change" and "easy bleeding"), κ or AC significantly exceeded 0.5 and the typical videos were judged to be applicable. For the two remaining items, the evaluation was repeated after clarifying the definitions of positive and negative findings. Eventually, they were recognized as typical. The completed video clip library contains 31 clips and is divided into five categories (http://www.jshbps.jp/modules/project/index.php?content_id=13)., Conclusions: This clip library may be highly useful in clinical settings as a more objective standard for assessing surgical difficulty in LC., (© 2020 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

Background: We previously identified 25 intraoperative findings during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) as potential indicators of surgical difficulty per nominal group technique. This study aimed to build a consensus among expert LC surgeons on the impact of each item on surgical difficulty., Methods: Surgeons from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan (n = 554) participated in a Delphi process and graded the 25 items on a seven-stage scale (range, 0-6). Consensus was defined as (1) the interquartile range (IQR) of overall responses ≤2 and (2) ≥66% of the responses concentrated within a median ± 1 after stratification by workplace and LC experience level., Results: Response rates for the first and the second-round Delphi were 92.6% and 90.3%, respectively. Final consensus was reached for all the 25 items. 'Diffuse scarring in the Calot's triangle area' in the 'Factors related to inflammation of the gallbladder' category had the strongest impact on surgical difficulty (median, 5; IQR, 1). Surgeons agreed that the surgical difficulty increases as more fibrotic change and scarring develop. The median point for each item was set as the difficulty score., Conclusions: A Delphi consensus was reached among expert LC surgeons on the impact of intraoperative findings on surgical difficulty., (© 2017 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

Background: Generally, surgeons' perceptions of surgical safety are based on experience and institutional policy. Our recent pilot survey demonstrated that the acceptable duration of surgery and criteria for open conversion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) vary among workplaces., Methods: A web-based survey was distributed to 554 expert LC surgeons in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. The questionnaire covered LC experience, safety measures and recognition of landmarks, decision-making regarding conversion to open/partial cholecystectomy and the implications of this decision. Overall responses were compared among nations, and then stratified by LC experience level (lifetime cases 200-499, 500-999, and ≥1,000)., Results: The response rate was 92.6% (513/554); 67 surgeons with ≤199 LCs were excluded, and responses from 446 surgeons were analyzed. We observed significant differences among nations on almost all questions. Differences that remained after stratification by LC experience were on questions related to acceptable duration of surgery, adoption rates of intraoperative cholangiography, the "critical view of safety" technique, identification of Rouvière's sulcus, recognition of the SS-Inner layer theory, and intraoperative judgment to abandon conventional LC., Conclusions: Even among experts, surgeons' perceptions during LC are workplace-dependent. A novel grading system of surgical difficulty and standardized LC procedures are paramount to generate high-level evidence., (© 2016 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

Background: Serious complications continue to occur in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The commonly used indicators of surgical difficulty such as the duration of surgery are insufficient because they are surgeon and institution dependent. We aimed to identify appropriate indicators of surgical difficulty during LC., Methods: A total of 26 Japanese expert LC surgeons discussed using the nominal group technique (NGT) to generate a list of intraoperative findings that contribute to surgical difficulty. Thereafter, a survey was circulated to 61 experts in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. The questionnaire addressed LC experience, surgical strategy, and perceptions of 30 intraoperative findings listed by the NGT., Results: The response rate of the survey was 100%. There was a statistically significant difference among nations regarding the duration of surgery and adoption rate of safety measures and recognition of landmarks. The criteria for conversion to an open or subtotal cholecystectomy were at the discretion of each surgeon. In contrast, perceptions of the impact of 30 intraoperative findings on surgical difficulty (categorized by factors related to inflammation and additional findings of the gallbladder and other intra-abdominal factors) were consistent among surgeons., Conclusions: Intraoperative findings are objective and considered to be appropriate indicators of surgical difficulty during LC., (© 2016 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

Purpose: Three years have passed since the publication of the Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis, and we believe that the time has come to assess their validity., Methods: In this study, we validated the diagnostic accuracy of these criteria in 74 patients with an initial diagnosis of acute cholangitis and 81 patients with an initial diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. We also statistically compared the accuracy of the diagnosis made based on the Tokyo Guidelines with that based on the presence of Charcot's triad for acute cholangitis and Murphy's sign for acute cholecystitis with use of the sign test to assess differences., Results: The results revealed that the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the Tokyo Guidelines for suspected or definitive acute cholangitis were 72.1 and 38.5%, respectively, and the corresponding values for definitive cholangitis alone were 63.9 and 69.2%, respectively. For definitive acute cholecystitis, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the Tokyo Guidelines were 84.9 and 50.0%, respectively. The accuracy of diagnosis based on the Tokyo Guidelines was significantly higher than that based on the presence of Charcot's triad (acute cholangitis, p < 0.001 by the sign test) or Murphy's sign (acute cholecystitis, p < 0.001 by the sign test)., Conclusions: It was therefore concluded that the Tokyo Guidelines should be used more widely for the diagnosis of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis in the twenty-first century. Hereafter, various efforts should be made to improve the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic criterion of the Tokyo Guidelines.