Search

The new heart allocation system in the United States prioritizes patients supported by temporary mechanical circulatory support (TMCS) devices over those with uncomplicated durable continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs), which may increase the number of patients bridged to transplant with TMCS. Limited data are available in guiding post-transplant outcomes with various TMCS devices. We sought to describe post-transplant outcome and identify clinical variables associated with post-transplant outcome in patients bridged to transplant with TMCS. Using data from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Thoracic Transplant Registry, we included subjects who underwent transplantation between 2005 and 2016 with known use of mechanical circulatory support. Pre-transplant recipient, donor, and transplant-specific variables were abstracted. The primary outcome was patient survival at 1-year post-transplant. Outcomes of patients bridged to transplant with TMCS were compared with those of patients bridged with CF-LVADs. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify clinical variables associated with the outcomes. There were 6,528 patients bridged to transplant with the following types of mechanical circulatory support: durable CF-LVADs (n = 6,206), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO, n = 134), percutaneous temporary CF-LVADs (n = 75), surgically implanted temporary CF-LVADs (n = 38) or surgically implanted temporary BiVAD (n = 75). Bridging with ECMO (hazard ratio 3.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.69–5.34, p < 0.001) or percutaneous temporary CF-LVADs (hazard ratio 1.83, 95% CI 1.09–3.08, p = 0.02) was independently associated with higher risk of mortality. Additional risk factors included older donor age, female/male donor-recipient match, older recipient age, higher recipient body mass index, higher recipient creatinine, and prolonged ischemic time. This analysis of a large international cohort of patients bridged to transplant with mechanical circulatory support identified ECMO and percutaneous temporary CF-LVADs as predictors of mortality after transplant, along with additional donor and recipient clinical characteristics. These findings may provide guidance to clinicians in decisions on mechanical circulatory support device selection, transplant eligibility, and timing of transplant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Survival beyond 1 year after heart transplantation has remained without significant improvement for the last 2 decades. A more individualized approach to post-transplant care could result in a reduction of long-term mortality. Although recipient age has been associated with an increased incidence of certain post-transplant morbidities, its effect on cause-specific mortality has not been established. Methods We analyzed overall and cause-specific mortality of heart transplant recipients registered in the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Registry between 1995 and 2011. Patients were grouped by recipient age: 18 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and ≥ 70 years. Multivariable regression models were used to examine the association between recipient age and leading causes of post-transplant mortality. We also compared immunosuppression (IS) use among the different recipient age groups. Results There were 52,995 recipients (78% male; median age [5th, 95th percentile]: 54 [27, 66] years). Survival through 10 years after transplant was lower in heart transplant recipients in the 2 more advanced age groups: 49% for 60 to 69 years and 36% for ≥ 70 years ( p < 0.01 for pairwise comparisons with remaining groups). The risk of death caused by acute rejection (hazard ratio [HR], 4.11; p < 0.01), cardiac allograft vasculopathy (HR, 2.85; p < 0.01), and graft failure (HR, 2.29; p < 0.01) was highest in the youngest recipients (18–29 years) compared with the reference grou p (50–59 years). However, the risk of death caused by infection (HR, 2.10; p < 0.01) and malignancy (HR, 2.23; p < 0.01) was highest in older recipients (≥ 70 years). Similarly, the risk of death caused by renal failure was lower in younger recipients than in the reference group (HR, 0.53; p < 0.01 for 18–49 years vs 50–59 years). The use of induction IS was similar among the different recipient age groups, and differences in maintenance IS were not clinically important. Conclusions Causes of death in this large cohort of heart transplant recipients varied significantly with recipient age at the time of transplant, with cause-specific mortality profiles suggesting a possible effect of inadequate IS in younger recipients and over-IS in older recipients. Thus, a more personalized approach, possibly including different IS strategies according to recipient age, might result in improved post-transplant survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background This study evaluated current trends in incidence and outcomes of left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-related thromboembolic (LVAD-TE) and LVAD malfunction (LVAD-M) complications among heart transplant (HT) candidates supported with continuous-flow LVADs. LVAD-TE and LVAD-M are potentially catastrophic complications that may require status upgrade on the HT waiting list. An increased incidence of device thrombosis has been recently observed; however, whether similar trends of LVAD-TE and LVAD-M are observed on the HT waiting list and their effect on outcomes is unknown. Methods We analyzed 3,821 HT candidates on continuous-flow LVADs who were registered on the United States waiting list from 2008 to 2014. We evaluated the incidence of LVAD-TE and LVAD-M as well as survival before and after HT. Results LVAD-TE occurred in 249 patients (6.5%) and LVAD-M in 210 patients (5.5%). The incidence of LVAD-TE was highest in regions 1, 2, and 9, whereas LVAD-M was highest in regions 9, 1, and 7. The incidence of LVAD-TE and LVAD-M increased after 2011 from 0.04 to 0.10 and from 0.03 to 0.08 events per patient-year ( p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Survival on the waiting list at 2 years was lower in candidates with LVAD-TE (45% vs 72%, p < 0.0001) and LVAD-M (56% vs 71%, p = 0.003) compared with candidates without complications. Post-HT survival was similar between patients with and without LVAD-TE and LVAD-M ( p > 0.43 for both outcomes). In patients with LVAD-TE, mortality risk was highest among candidates managed conservatively (hazard ratio, 8.07; p < 0.0001), whereas patients who underwent HT only (hazard ratio, 0.10; p < 0.0001) had the lowest mortality risk and similar to that of patients without LVAD-TE ( p = 0.34). Conclusions The incidence of LVAD-TE and LVAD-M on the United States waiting list has increased since 2011, with significant regional variation. LVAD-TE and LVAD-M have a detrimental effect on waiting list survival and transplant candidacy. In candidates who develop an LVAD-TE, a conservative approach, without LVAD exchange or HT, carries the highest risk of death. These results should be considered in the ongoing efforts to optimize the allocation of donor hearts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiac remodeling is an adaptive, compensatory biological process following an initial insult to the myocardium that gradually becomes maladaptive and causes clinical deterioration and chronic heart failure (HF). This biological process involves several pathophysiological adaptations at the genetic, molecular, cellular, and tissue levels. A growing body of clinical and translational investigations demonstrated that cardiac remodeling and chronic HF does not invariably result in a static, end-stage phenotype but can be at least partially reversed. One of the paradigms which shed some additional light on the breadth and limits of myocardial elasticity and plasticity is long term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in advanced HF pediatric and adult patients. MCS by providing (a) ventricular mechanical unloading and (b) effective hemodynamic support to the periphery results in functional, structural, cellular and molecular changes, known as cardiac reverse remodeling. Herein, we analyze and synthesize the advances in our understanding of the biology of MCS-mediated reverse remodeling and myocardial recovery. The MCS investigational setting offers access to human tissue, providing an unparalleled opportunity in cardiovascular medicine to perform in-depth characterizations of myocardial biology and the associated molecular, cellular, and structural recovery signatures. These human tissue findings have triggered and effectively fueled a "bedside to bench and back" approach through a variety of knockout, inhibition or overexpression mechanistic investigations in vitro and in vivo using small animal models. These follow-up translational and basic science studies leveraging human tissue findings have unveiled mechanistic myocardial recovery pathways which are currently undergoing further testing for potential therapeutic drug development. Essentially, the field is advancing by extending the lessons learned from the MCS cardiac recovery investigational setting to develop therapies applicable to the greater, not end-stage, HF population. This review article focuses on the biological aspects of the MCS-mediated myocardial recovery and together with its companion review article, focused on the clinical aspects, they aim to provide a useful framework for clinicians and investigators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) leads to favorable changes in the failing heart at the molecular, cellular, and structural levels. However, myocardial recovery leading to device explantation is rare. We reasoned that the multicenter United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry might provide insights into clinical predictors and outcomes of the recovery process. Methods The MCS device data set of the UNOS registry was queried for patients with long-term continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) that were explanted for heart transplantation or indication of recovery. Analysis was restricted to adult patients (≥18 years old) who were listed for an initial heart transplantation. Patients with CF-LVADs that were explanted because of recovery were compared with patients with CF-LVADs who underwent transplantation. Results We identified 594 patients with HeartMate II devices and 92 patients with HeartWare devices. Duration of support was on average 500.4 ± 325.3 days. In 34 (5.0%) patients, devices were explanted secondary to myocardial recovery. Univariate predictors of recovery in patients with long-term LVADs included younger age (40 years vs 53 years), female sex, lower body mass index (25.7 kg/m 2 vs 27.9 kg/m 2 ), non-ischemic etiology (91% vs 59%), lack of implantable cardioverter defibrillator at the time of listing (44% vs 79%), and lower serum creatinine (0.97 mg/dl vs 1.28 mg/dl) (all p < 0.05). In the post-explantation period, freedom from death or transplantation was 66% at 1 year. Conclusions The incidence of recovery on device support is low in the current MCS era and limited to a select cohort of predominantly young patients with non-ischemic myopathy. Given the high incidence of disease recurrence, patients should be closely followed after device explantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Immune allosensitization can be triggered by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF LVAD). However, the effect of this type of allosensitization on post-transplant outcomes remains controversial. This study examined the post-transplant course in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing transplantation with and without LVAD bridging. Methods We included consecutive patients who were considered for cardiac transplant from 2006 to 2015. Serum alloantibodies were detected with single-antigen beads on the Luminex platform (One Lambda Inc., Canoga Park, CA). Allosensitization was defined as calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) > 10%. cPRA was determined at multiple times. LVAD-associated allosensitization was defined as development of cPRA > 10% in patients with cPRA ≤ 10% before LVAD implantation. Post-transplant outcomes of interest were acute cellular rejection (ACR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and survival. Results Allosensitization status was evaluated in 268 patients (20% female). Mean age was 52 ± 12 years, and 132 (49.3%) received CF LVADs. After LVAD implant, 30 patients (23%) became newly sensitized, and the level of sensitization appeared to diminish in many of these patients while awaiting transplant. During the study period, 225 of 268 patients underwent transplant, and 43 did not. A CF LVAD was used to bridge 50% of the transplant recipients. Compared with patients without new sensitization or those already sensitized at baseline, the patients with LVAD-associated sensitization had a higher risk of ACR ( p = 0.049) and higher risk of AMR ( p = 0.018) but a similar intermediate-term post-transplant survival. The patients who did not receive a transplant had higher level of allosensitization, with a baseline cPRA of 20% vs 6% in those who received an allograft and a high risk (40%) of death during follow-up. Conclusions New allosensitization takes place in > 20% of patents supported with CF LVADs. Among patients who undergo transplant, this results in a higher risk of ACR and AMR, but survival remains favorable, likely due to the efficacy of current management after transplant. However, mortality in sensitized patients who do not reach transplant remains high, and new approaches are necessary to meet the needs of this group of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]