Search

This analysis was designed to determine if there existed differences by race in seeking sexually transmitted disease (STD) care in an emergency department (ED)., Methods: Data were collected from 4,138 patients attending 26 STD clinics across the United States (U.S.). The questionnaire asked where the patient would have sought care if the STD clinic had not been available that day. Responses were stratified by race and differences were tested for statistical significance., Results: Black/African American patients chose hospital emergency room as an alternative for STD clinic care at a rate approximately 2.5 times that of White patients (15.5% v. 5.8%, p < .05). This difference persisted among Black/African American patients after controlling for demographic variables (adjusted OR 2.91; 2.21-3.82 95% CI)., Discussion: Receiving appropriate care is key to stemming the increases in sexually transmitted infections in the U.S. These findings suggest that disparities in access to STD care exist for Black/African American people.

Lesser health care access and utilization in rural areas are associated with ruralurban health outcome disparities. While some work has examined similar disparities by sexual orientation, little has explicitly explored the combined influences of rural residence and lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) status. This study aims to explore literature specific to rural LGB health care access and utilization, identify gaps, and suggest future research. Several databases were searched to identify studies specific to LGB health care access and utilization, and 18 articles were identified and divided into two categories: barriers and facilitators to health care access. Barriers included provider training, discrimination, distance and physical access, and fewer social supports. The data also indicated that sexual orientation disclosure is associated with better health care. Rural sexual minority individuals undergo health care access and utilization inequities, even in excess of their heterosexual rural peers that may be addressed with training and social interventions. Further research is warranted.

Rural status in the United States can be objectively measured using multiple designations within different geographic extents, often considering both population density and proximity to urban areas. However, these measurements are often incomplete for assessing the relationship between rural status and health and are often inadequately considered in analysis. To address these limitations, we posit four recommendations: two recommendations to improve current measures by including additional factors and making measures continuous and two recommendations to improve regression analysis by considering rural status as a contextual factor in multilevel modeling and as a variable in conjunction with socioeconomic factors derived through principal component analysis.

Rural populations often face higher cancer rates and have lower cancer screening rates than urban populations. Screening disparities may be mediated by limited access to care, less knowledge of screening, and psychosocial factors. While the improved insurance rates and more comprehensive coverage under the Affordable Care Act may address some of these barriers, rural-urban disparities in cancer screening may not be fully attenuated. Faith-based interventions have been an effective approach to improving cancer screening among rural and underserved populations. Similarly, faith community nurses (FCNs) may be an effective agents for implementing evidence-based cancer screening strategies in rural communities. We provide a model for how FCNs standards of professional performance and practice can enable them to implement screening strategies. We also posit two recommendations of services that FCNs can provide to improve cancer screening in rural areas: educational messaging and patient navigation.

The Delta Region is a federally designated, socioeconomically disadvantaged region of the United States covering 252 counties in eight states along the Mississippi River. The objective of this study is to describe the Region's cancer mortality burden. National Center for Health Statistics data were used to calculate age-adjusted mortality rates and rate ratios for the Delta Region for all cancers, lung, colorectal, breast (female), cervical, and prostate cancers. Rates were also calculated for comparison groups, and were stratified by gender, race, rurality, and socioeconomic status. The all-cancer mortality rate in the Delta Region was higher than all comparison groups across all stratifications. Higher rates were seen for cervical and colorectal cancer across comparison groups and stratifications. Delta Blacks had higher rates than Whites, and rural Delta residents had higher rates than their urban peers for most cancers. Further research and interventions should be conducted to elucidate and reduce these disparities.