Search

Over the last 25 years, national Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) and hospital firms attempted to enter local markets, either by acquiring formerly independent, locally based HMOs and hospitals or by directly entering local markets. While national HMOs have been relatively successful, national hospital firms have had much less success. This paper explores the reasons for this difference. It reviews changes in presence of national HMO and hospital firms in markets, discusses common conceptual lenses through which national entry into local markets typically has been viewed, and shows how social network theory can be used to develop a better understanding of why the entry experience of national HMO and hospital firms varies across markets. The paper concludes with a research agenda that addresses issues raised by social network theory and its application to national firm entry into local markets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper proposes a theoretical framework and an empirical example of the relationship between the civic stratification of immigrants in the United States, and their access to healthcare. We use the 2007 Pew Hispanic Center/Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Hispanic Healthcare Survey, a nationally representative survey of U.S. Latinos (N = 2,783 foreign-born respondents) and find that immigrants who are not citizens or legal permanent residents are significantly more likely to be excluded from care in both the United States and across borders. Legal-status differences in cross-border care utilization persisted after controlling for health status, insurance coverage, and other potential demographic and socioeconomic predictors of care. Exclusion from care on both sides of the border was associated with reduced rates of receiving timely preventive services. Civic stratification, and political determinants broadly speaking, should be considered alongside social determinants of population health and health care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper reviews the author's experience in becoming a medical sociologist before the field had become formalized. The contributions to medical sociology of sociologist Selden D. Bacon and physician and medical educator William R. Willard are described. The relationship of medical sociology to medical behavioral science, as experienced at the University of Kentucky, is discussed. Finally, the thesis of the author's 1957 paper on the nature and status of medical sociology is re-examined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drawing from theory on institutionalized organizational environments, this paper analyzes the actions of community-based service programs providing care for people with AIDS. The focus is on the interorganizational relations developed by the lead agencies in demonstration projects attempting to coordinate services in three communities. The paper identifies differential styles of organizational response to developmental and operational issues. These differences are related to the conceptual distinction between organizational responses to technical environments and those to normative, or "institutional," environmental features. Various factors are identified that appear to promote a higher degree of institutionalization in interorganizational relations. Coordination as a reform strategy is seen to have become, in itself, an institutionalized myth to which organizations must subscribe in order to gain legitimacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper probes two aspects of the medical profession in Singapore: its structure and its social position. The first section reviews the relevant concepts concerning the structure and the social position of the professions that may be applied to medicine in Singapore. The second section looks into the structure of the medical profession in Singapore from an historical perspective. The third section deals with the internal organization of the medical profession. The fourth section focuses on its social position. The paper concludes with a summary of the main points and a brief comparison of the situation in Singapore with that in other countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is a "state of the issue" paper about gender and physical health. It organizes the hypotheses proposed for male-female differences in physical health status, therapeutic health behaviors, and longevity and it summarizes empirical research, especially sociological research, on the topic over the past 10-15 years. Capsule summaries of sex differentials in health and of recent trends in health and morality are also presented for American (U.S.) men and women. The central theoretical viewpoint of this paper is that sex differences in health are principally the outcome of differential risks acquired from roles, stress, life styles, and preventive health practices. Psychosocial factors—how men and women perceive and evaluate symptoms, and their readiness and ability to take therapeutic actions—are important as well, but typically secondary to acquired risks. Other factors such as prior health care, biological risks, health reporting, and caretaker effects (for example, physician sex bias) have even smaller importance. We hypothesize that the relative weight of acquired risks and psychosocial factors varies for different types of health problems as follows: (1) Psychosocial factors have their greatest weight in responses to chronic, nonfatal, or low severity diseases and injuries and (2) gender differences are also greatest in responses to these; that is, men and women differ more in their perception, evaluation, and treatment of prolonged, mild conditions than of acute, life-threatening, or severe ones. The paper suggests some strategies for social science research on male-female health differences in the next decade or two. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper uses an institutional perspective (Scott, 1994; 2001; DiMaggio and Powell, 1991) to analyze the history and current state of the American health care field in terms of the alignment of its normative, cognitive, and regulatory elements. I depict the relation between institutional elements in each of three historical eras of the health care field (Scott et al 2000): the era of professional dominance (1945-1965), the era of federal involvement (1966-1982), and the era of managerial control and market mechanisms (after 1983 to the present). I argue that a weakening of alignment between these elements, beginning in the 1970s and increasing in the 1980s, led to consumer and provider dissatisfaction with managed care, and that the state of the field in the beginning of the 21st century suggests that a new era is emerging with renewed alignment between normative beliefs and values, cognitive models, and regulation. Implications for the future of health care and institutional theory are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The United States is the only western industrialized nation that fails to provide universal coverage and the only nation where health care for the majority of the population is financed by for-profit, minimally regulated private insurance companies. These arrangements leave one-sixth of the population uninsured at any given time, and they leave others at risk of losing insurance as a result of normal lVe course events. Political theorists of the welfare state usually attribute the failure of national health insurance in the United States to broader forces of American political development, but they ignore the distinctive character of the health care financing arrangements that do exist Medical sociologists emphasize the way that physicians parlayed their professional expertise into legal, institutional, and economic power but not the way this power was asserted in the political arena. This paper proposes a theory of stakeholder mobilization as the primary obstacle to national health insurance. The evidence supports the argument that powerful stakeholder groups, first the American Medical Association, then organizations of insurance companies and employer groups, have been able to defeat every effort to enact national health insurance across an entire century because they had superior resources and an organizational structure that closely mirrored the federated arrangements of the American state. The exception occurred when the AFL-CIO, with its national leadership, state federations and union locals, mobilized on behalf of Medicare. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The context for contemporary research and policy is set through a theoretically informed history of the modern American health care system that draws on the concept of countervailing powers and Fligstein's theory of control In this context, the papers of this special issue are then introduced. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the past decade, different parties in the health care field have developed and disseminated clinical practice guidelines as part of evidence-based medicine. These formal tools based on a scientific evaluation of the research literature purport to tell health care professionals how to practice medicine. Because clinical practice guidelines shift the knowledge base in the health care field through standardization, they remain con troversial within and outside medicine. In this paper, we evaluate the predictive accuracy of four medical professionalization theories-functionalism, Freidson's theory of professional dominance, deprofessionalization theory, and the theory of countervailing powers- to account for (1) the shift from pathophysiology to epidemiology with guidelines, (2) the creation of practice guidelines, and (3) the effects of clinical practice guidelines on the autonomy of health professionals. In light of the mixed predictive record of professionalization theories, we conclude with a need for "evidence-based sociology" and a recalibration of basic premises underlying professionalization theories. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper examines the impact of changes in the medical marketplace on medicalization in U S. society. Using four cases (Viagra, Paxil, human growth hormone and in vitro fertilization), we focus on two aspects of the changing medical marketplace: the role of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs and the emergence of private medical markets. We demonstrate how consumers and pharmaceutical corporations contribute to medicalization, with physicians, insurance coverage, and changes in regulatory practices playing facilitating roles. In some cases, insurers attempt to counteract medicalization by restricting access. We distinguish mediated and private medical markets, each characterized by differing relationships with corporations, insurers, consumers, and physicians. In the changing medical environment, with medical markets as intervening factors, corporations and insurers are becoming more significant determinants in the medicalization process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Racial inequity in the provision of healthcare is widely recognized. In this paper I assess the role of social distance from healthcare providers in accounting for whites' higher rating of healthcare providers. Using data from the Detroit Area Study, I test whether having higher socioeconomic status, like most healthcare providers, and racial concordance with healthcare provider account for the gap in satisfaction between whites and African Americans. I find that socioeconomic status and racial concordance variables account for a portion of whites' higher rating of the respect shown by their healthcare provider Racial differences in evaluation of time spent with healthcare provider are accounted for by socioeconomic status, but not racial concordance. As researchers explore the causes of and remedies for the racial disparity in use and evaluation of healthcare, the subtle and indirect effects of race on the patient-healthcare provider relationship must be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drawing from an institutional-theory perspective on innovations in organizations, this paper examines the use of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention practices by the nation's outpatient substance abuse treatment units during a critical period from 1988 to 1995. An institutional perspective argues that organizations adopt new practices not only for technical reasons, but also because external actors actively promote or model the use of particular practices. We examine the extent to which treatment units use several practices to prevent HIV infection among their clients and among drug-users not in treatment. Results from random-effects regression analyses of national survey data show that treatment units significantly increased their use of HIV prevention practices from 1988 to 1995. Further, the results show that treatment units' use of prevention practices was related to clients' risk for HIV infection, unit resources available to support these practices, and organizational support for the practices. Implications are discussed for an institutional view of organizational innovation as well as for research on HIV prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper examines the factors that influence a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) to shift risk to doctors through an incentive arrangement called capitation, where physicians are paid a fixed amount per patient for a period of time for any and all medical services required by the patient. Multispecialty-medical-group (Group) HMOs are more likely to shift risk than Independent Physician Associations (IPA) HMOs. Within IPA HMOs, larger enrollment per physician is positively associated with more risk shifting. We find that institutional factors signaling legitimacy play an important role in determining risk shifting. For-profit HMOs are less likely to shift risk, which we interpret as reflecting consumer distrust of for-profit HMOs. However, for-profit HMOs that are federally qualified, which we interpret as a signal of legitimacy, are more likely to shift risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper reviews various theoretical perspectives on organizational change which have been and could be applied to medical organizations. These perspectives are discussed as both filters influencing our observations (research) and mirrors of the shifting dynamics of delivery system reform (policy). We conclude with an examination of how such theories can provide useful insights into our rapidly changing health care system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper we examine the hypothesis that health differences between Blacks and Whites in later life are related to socioeconomic status. Using the 1984 panel of the Survey of Income and Program Participation, we construct four measures of health and two measures of health care service utilization. Multivariate analyses show that the racial differences are eliminated in some measures of health and health care service utilization after homing constant individual-level socioeconomic characteristics and resources. However, even after accounting for differences in socioeconomic status, Black self-rated health is poorer than that of Whites. Further, Blacks report more visits to medical personnel but do not report higher rates of hospitalization when levels of health and economic resources are controlled. Additional analyses suggest that the impact of socioeconomic status on health is different for Blacks than for Whites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the late 1950s American pediatricians began to place increased emphasis on psychosocial and behavioral issues in medical training and research. An intraprofessional movement for psychosocial pediatrics led to alterations in the specialty's stated jurisdiction. One explanation for the movement's origins is that demand for treating sick children was eroding; primary-care providers took up the delivery of behavioral services to avoid extinction. This paper shows that routinization of work, not market decline, preceded psychosocial pediatrics. Academicians rather than community practitioners spearheaded boundary expansion. The movement's major consequence appears to be a new division of labor between pediatricians and other health care professionals rather than increased pediatric treatment of children's psychosocial disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Emphasis on rural health problems has led to a relative neglect of urban health issues in developing societies. Yet the fact that a large proportion of the limited financial and human resources is allocated to urban health care makes it imperative for researchers and health planners to evaluate the effectiveness of the urban health care system. This paper examines data on health care utilization from a sample survey of 1500 households conducted in three areas of Accra, Ghana in 1982. The factors that influence the use of three types of health care services (clinics, drug vendors, and traditional healers) are examined. Suggestions are made for increasing the effectiveness of the health care system in Accra, with the aim of making medical care more accessible to all families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper explores the effects of computerized medical information systems on the occupational communities of health care professionals in hospitals. Interviews were conducted with informants from the pharmacy and nursing departments at two hospitals currently using medical information systems for communicating physicians' medication orders from the nursing station to the pharmacy. Results showed changes in tasks for both pharmacy and nursing, resulting in increased interdependence between the two departments. This interdependence was accompanied by improved communication and cooperation, providing an opportunity to encourage better working relationships between departments. The use and maintenance of the common computerized data base became a superordinate goal for the two groups, with the computer system itself as the topic of communication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite a half century of radical changes in medical practice, the teaching/learning experience of medical students has remained remarkably similar. At the same time, medical educators have frequently instituted curricular reforms. To analyze this history of reform without change, this paper first establishes what the content and the structure of medical education in the United States are, and how they came to be that way. Then it traces a process whereby the scientific mission of academic medicine has crowded out its social responsibility to train for society's most basic health care delivery needs. The main argument is that medical education's manifest humanistic mission is little more than a screen for the research mission which is the major concern of the institution's social structure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Using recent first-hand accounts by Klass (1987), Konner (1987), LeBaron (1982), and Reilly (1987), this paper examines "insiders' "experiences of medical school. Medical education emphasizes disease, technical procedures, and technological medicine, with scant attention to "caring" aspects of doctoring. Students struggle to learn medicine and to maintain a humanistic or patient-oriented perspective, but the social environment of medical training militates against humanistic doctoring. Toward the end of medical school, students undergo a transformation by adopting the medical-clinical perspective and shifting their identification from patients to doctors. The doctors who maintain a humanistic orientation to medical care appear to be individuals who had developed this orientation before they arrived at medical school. Thus, to increase the number of humanistic physicians, the best strategy may be to alter medical school recruitment and selection policies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The introduction to this special issue of the Journal expands the scope of research on "the sociology of medical education" to include studies of the institutions in which physicians are trained as well as studies of the socialization of the physician throughout the life cycle. Research since the 1960s is reviewed briefly and the papers in this issue are discussed. Studies of the macropolitics and micropolitics of academic medicine are called for as well as comparative analyses of the settings in which physicians are trained and research on the relative effects on physicians' attitudes and behavior of different sets of experiences, professional and nonprofessional, over the course of their life cycle-all in the context of massive changes in the organization of health care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper is a revision of the address given upon receipt of the Leo G. Reeder Award for distinguished Scholarship in Medical Sociology. It was presented on August 19, 1987 to the Medical Sociology Section of the American Sociological Association during its annual meeting held in Chicago. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents a cohort analysis of the use of health services by elderly Americans. Standard cohort tables are constructed using data on approximately 50,000 individuals from the 1972, 1976, and 1980 Health Interview Surveys. Six 4-year age cohorts are tracked: the youngest, 56-59 years old in 1972: the oldest, 84-87 years old in 1980. Significant age and period effects on physician and hospital contact have been detected; for example the aging effect reflects an increase in the percentage of individuals who either saw a physician on an outpatient basis or were hospitalized in the previous year. Analysis of the volume of physician visits reveals an inverse J-curve relationship with age, with the pivotal point occurring at or about age 80. Consideration of nine alternative explanations of the J-curve phenomenon shows that three are plausible on either conceptual or empirical grounds. Two of these explanations suggest the substitution of either (1) hospital-based services for ambulatory-based services or (2) social supports (especially in the form of older children as care givers) for physicians' services: the third explanation focuses on the involuntary severance of patient-practitioner relationships. resulting from the retirement or death of longstanding family physicians. Finally, competing policy implications of these explanations are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hospitals are being transformed from a cottage industry in which each institution is relatively autonomous to a series of multihospital systems where a network of individual institutions are directed from corporate headquarters. The present paper examines the impact of adding a hierarchical level to the top of the hospital on the role of the hospital's chief executive officer (CEO). We report results of CEO functioning (201 from multihospital systems and 188 from traditional freestanding hospitals) relative to (1) division of labor, (2) need for coordination, and (3) managerial autonomy. We show that multisystem CEOs' activities are more standardized. but not more specialized, than those of freestanding hospital CEOs; however, we show only moderate support for the increased involvement in coordination activities for those in multihospital systems. Finally, while CEOs in multihospital systems exhibit less actual autonomy in their roles as managers, they perceive themselves as having more autonomy than CEOs in freestanding hospitals. These findings arc considered with respect to the administrator's credo of balancing the need of communities for healthcare with the organization's need to remain financially viable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although the dramatic rise in national expenditures for medical services the past quarter century is due to a number of factors, this paper investigates the hypothesis that an increase in the supply of physicians is one major factor. Longitudinal analysis of trends for the United States from 1940 to 1981, and the cross-sectional analysis of eight industrialized countries and nine census regions in the United States, support the hypothesis. Since the increase in physicians is largely due to deliberate policy decisions in the past, the increase in costs, which policymakers are now trying to contain is in large part the result of actions that policymakers themselves have made. The increase in the supply of physicians (the "physician surplus") will put upward pressures on the national expenditures for medical care in the years ahead. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The editor, in this article, presents his views on various issues related to health and social behavior. The editor argues that according to figures provided by the previous two editors of the "Journal of Health and Social Behavior," (JHSB) this journal has had and continues to have an impact just under the "American Sociological Review" and the "American Journal of Sociology. " In fact, JHSB's impact factor has been almost double that of "Social Forces" for a number of years. The editor promises to continue the outstanding work of prior JHSB editors in selecting and publishing high quality, theory-driven, empirical papers across a wide range of topics in health and illness, the sociology of medicine, and the organization of medical care. JHSB is the journal. In the editor's view , a good editor, with the help of the editorial board and a bevy of careful reviewers, publishes the very best papers that are submitted for consideration and trusts that these reflect the cutting edge of the field.

The article presents Michael Hughes' introduction, the editor of the "Journal of Health and Social Behavior." When he applied for the post of editor he pledged that he would encourage the submission of more articles with an institutional or organizational focus on health care and health care delivery. During his editorship, the journal did not receive an inordinate number of submissions on health care, and from March 2001 through June 2004, the "Journal of Health and Social Behavior," published health care organization and delivery articles at about the same rate as it had over the previous six years. Most papers submitted to and published in the journal continued to be on the etiology and epidemiology of health problems, including a very high proportion of studies on mental health and the stress process. As his background is in social psychological approaches to mental health, he had to lean heavily on those with the appropriate expertise. He thanks Ann Flood, deputy editor, who was immensely helpful in initial planning for the issue and in helping him work through the problem of identifying an editor.