Search

Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can negatively impact intimacy, relationships, and sexual functioning through changes in physical, endocrine, cognitive, behavioral, and emotional function. Without intervention, diminished intimacy and/or sexual functioning in individuals with TBI may persist. Although most health care professionals agree that sexuality and intimacy in relationships are significant concerns and should be addressed in rehabilitation, these concerns are not typically discussed during rehabilitation and discharge planning for people with TBI. To address this gap, an expert panel of North American clinicians and researchers convened to develop evidence-informed recommendations to assist clinicians in providing a framework and guidance on how clinicians can support individuals after TBI. Methods: A systematic search of multiple databases was conducted to identify relevant evidence published from 2010 to 2023. The INTIMASY-TBI Expert Panel developed recommendations for optimizing discussions and interventions related to intimacy and sexuality for people with TBI in rehabilitation and community-based programs. For each recommendation, the experts evaluated the evidence by examining the study design and quality to determine the level of evidence. Results: A total of 12 recommendations were developed that address the following topic areas: (1) interprofessional team training, (2) early education on the effects of TBI on intimacy, relationships, and sexuality, (3) creating individualized interventions, (4) education, assessment, and management of the causes of sexual dysfunction, and (5) providing written materials and relationship coaching to persons with TBI and their partners. Two recommendations were supported by Level A evidence, 1 was supported by Level B evidence, and 9 were supported by Level C (consensus of the INTIMASY-TBI Expert Panel) evidence. A decision algorithm was developed to assist clinicians in navigating through the recommendations. Conclusion: The INTIMASY-TBI Guideline is one of the first comprehensive clinical practice guidelines to offer strategies to trained clinicians to discuss the physical, psychosocial, behavioral, and emotional aspects of intimacy and sexuality with persons with TBI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Behavioral changes following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (MSTBI) are common and can include agitation or aggression, reduced arousal or apathy, and inappropriate sexual behavior. These changes can negatively affect recovery, function, and quality of life. Pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions are often used to address these challenges; however, there is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of these treatments. This article will summarize the updated recommendations for the assessment and management of behavioral changes in adults after MSTBI. Design: A systematic search was conducted by the evidence-based review of moderate to severe acquired brain injury to identify new and relevant articles. Expert panels reviewed and discussed the new and existing evidence, evaluated its quality, and added, removed, or modified recommendations and tools as needed. A consensus process was followed to achieve agreement on recommendations. Results: The 2023 Canadian Clinical Practice Guideline for the Rehabilitation of Adults with Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (CAN-TBI 2023) includes 21 recommendations regarding best practices for the assessment and management of behavioral disorders post- MSTBI. Fifteen recommendations remained unchanged, and 6 recommendations were updated. Eight recommendations are based on level B evidence and 13 on level C evidence. There are no recommendations based on level A evidence. The guideline also includes a step-by-step algorithm for clinicians to follow outlining an approach to the assessment and management of agitation and aggression. Conclusion: CAN-TBI 2023 will assist clinicians in the assessment and safe and effective management of behavioral changes post-MSTBI. The guideline is informed by a growing scientific database although there is a need for additional high-quality research to better guide the assessment and management of this complex patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To present an evidence-based review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating interventions for the management of behavioral issues post moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (MSTBI), as part of an extensive database that has been conceptualized as a living systematic review. Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO, up to and including December 2022, for articles published in the English language, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of RCT was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, and level of evidence was assigned using a modified Sackett scale. Results: Forty-six RCTs examining interventions and outcome measures related to behavioral issues post-MSTBI were included. These studies collectively enrolled 3,267 participants. The majority of RCTs were conducted in the United States (n = 27; 58.7%) and 28 (60.9%) were conducted after 2010. Of these, 27 RCTs examined non-pharmacological interventions and 19 examined pharmacological interventions. Effective pharmacological treatments included amantadine and dexmedetomidine. Effective non-pharmacological interventions included sensory stimulation in the acute phase, anger self-management programs, peer mentoring, problem-solving, and emotional regulation. Psychotherapy showed conflicting evidence. Conclusion: This evidence-based review provides a comprehensive overview of the research landscape of RCTs addressing behavior post-MSTBI. The findings from these RCTs may be valuable for health care professionals, researchers, and policymakers involved in the field of TBI and behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: After sustaining a moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (MSTBI), individuals often experience comorbid mental health conditions that can impair the rehabilitation and recovery process. The objective of this initiative was to update recommendations on the assessment and management of mental health conditions for the Canadian Clinical Practice Guideline for the Rehabilitation of Adults with MSTBI (CAN-TBI 2023). Design: A systematic search was conducted by the Evidence-Based Review of Moderate to Severe Acquired Brain Injury to identify new and relevant articles. Expert Panel reviewed and discussed the new and existing evidence, evaluated its quality, and added, removed, or modified recommendations and tools as needed. A consensus process was followed to achieve agreement on recommendations. Results: CAN-TBI 2023 includes 20 recommendations regarding best practices for the assessment and management of mental health conditions post-MSTBI. About 17 recommendations were updated, 1 new recommendation was formed, and 2 recommendations remained unchanged. The Guideline emphasizes the importance of screening and assessment of mental health conditions throughout the rehabilitation continuum. The Expert Panel recommended incorporating multimodal treatments that include pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches to manage mental health concerns. Conclusion: The CAN-TBI 2023 recommendations for the assessment and management of mental health conditions should be used to inform clinical practice. Additional high-quality research in this area is needed, as 13 recommendations are based on level C evidence, 4 on level B evidence, and 3 on level A evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To present an evidence-based review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating interventions for mental health post-moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (post-MSTBI), as part of an extensive database that has been conceptualized as a living systematic review. Methods: Systematic searches were conducted for RCTs published in the English language in MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO, up to and including December 2022, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The methodological quality of RCTs was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale, and the level of evidence was assigned using a modified Sackett scale. Results: Eighty-seven RCTs examining mental health interventions and outcome measures post-MSTBI were included. These studies collectively enrolled 6471 participants. A total of 41 RCTs (47.1%) were conducted in the United States and 56 studies (64.4%) were published after 2010. A total of 62 RCTs (71.3%) examined nonpharmacological interventions and 25 RCTs (28.7%) examined pharmacological interventions. Effective pharmacological treatments included desipramine and cerebrolysin; methylphenidate and rivastigmine showed conflicting evidence. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) was found to be effective for hopelessness, stress, and anxiety, compared to usual care; however, it may be as effective as supportive psychotherapy for depression. CBT combined with motivational interviewing may be as effective as CBT combined with nondirective counseling for depression, stress, and anxiety. Acceptance and commitment therapy was effective for anxiety, stress, and depression. Tai Chi, dance, and walking appeared to be effective for depression and stress, while other nonpharmacological treatments such as peer mentoring showed limited effectiveness. Conclusion: This evidence-based review provides a comprehensive overview of the research landscape of RCTs addressing mental health post-MSTBI. The findings from these RCTs may be valuable for health care professionals, researchers, and policymakers involved in the field of mental health and neurorehabilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: It is often challenging for providers to remain up to date with best practices gleaned from clinical research. Consequently, patients may receive inappropriate, suboptimal, and costly care. Living clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) maintain the methodological rigor of traditional CPGs but are continuously updated in response to new research findings, changes in clinical practice, and emerging evidence. The objective of this initiative was to discuss the lessons learned from the transformation of the Canadian Clinical Practice Guideline for the Rehabilitation of Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury (CAN-TBI) from a traditional guideline update model to a living guideline model. Design: The CAN-TBI Guideline provides evidence-based rehabilitative care recommendations for individuals who have sustained a TBI. The Guideline is divided into 2 sections: Section I, which provides guidance on the components of the optimal TBI rehabilitation system, and Section II, which focuses on the assessment and rehabilitation of brain injury sequelae. A comprehensive outline of the living guideline process is presented. Results: The CAN-TBI living guideline process has yielded 351 recommendations organized within 21 domains. Currently, 30 recommendations are supported by level A evidence, 81 recommendations are supported by level B evidence, and 240 consensus-based recommendations (level C evidence) comprise 68% of the CAN-TBI Guideline. Conclusion: Given the increasing volume of research published on moderate-to-severe TBI rehabilitation, the CAN-TBI living guideline process allows for real-time integration of emerging evidence in response to the fastest-growing topics, ensuring that practitioners have access to the most current and relevant recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To describe experiences and challenges when updating a living evidence-based review database of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on mental health and behavioral disorders in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (MSTBI). Method: This commentary derives from our experience developing an extensive database of RCTs on MSTBI that has been conceptualized as a living evidence-based review. Our working group focused on mental health and behavior RCTs and reflected upon their experiences and challenges using the living systematic approach. We discuss challenges associated with metrics of study quality, injury etiology and severity, time post-injury, country of origin, and variability in outcome measures. Results: RCTs were conducted almost solely in high income countries, with smaller sample sizes, and most conducted in the chronic phase post-TBI. Issues related to lack of transparency, unclear and incomplete reporting of injury severity, etiology, and time post-injury remain a concern and can lead to challenges associated with interpretation of results, validity, and reliability of the data. There was significant heterogeneity regarding the use of outcome measures and constructs, underscoring the need for standardization. Conclusion: Lack of standardization and incomplete reporting of injury characteristics makes it difficult to compare data between RCTs of MSTBI, perform meta-analyses, and generate evidence-based clinical recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Concussions most commonly affect the vestibular and ocular systems. Clinical measures used in the assessment of vestibular and ocular deficits should contain strong psychometric properties so that clinicians can accurately detect abnormality to guide treatment interventions., Objectives: The aim of this scoping review was: (1) to identify the measures used to evaluate the vestibular and ocular domains postconcussion and (2) to document the psychometric properties of the measures., Methods: Two databases (Medline (Ovid) and Embase) were searched from inception to May 2023. An updated search was completed in January 2024 using the same databases and search terms. Studies were screened and data were extracted independently by 2 reviewers. Measures were categorized into vestibular, ocular, or both (vestibular and ocular) domains, and relevant psychometric properties were documented., Results: Fifty-two studies were included in this review. 28 studies explored the use of vestibular measures, 12 explored ocular measures, and 12 explored both vestibular and ocular measures or explored the use of vestibulo-ocular reflex measures. Most studies explored the properties associated with balance measures, particularly the balance error scoring system. Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity metrics) of the associated measures was the most frequently documented characteristic in the literature., Conclusion: Identification of clinical measures used to evaluate vestibular and ocular deficits postconcussion is needed to understand the evidence supporting their use in practice. Documenting the psychometric properties will allow clinicians and researchers to understand the status of the current literature and support for the use of certain measures in practice in terms of their ability to appropriately detect deficits in people with concussion when deficits are truly present., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)