Search

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of, and factors associated with, reoperation after distal radius nonunion repair., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a multicenter academic institution and identified adult patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for distal radius nonunion between January 2005 and August 2021. Thirty-three patients were included in this study. The cohort consisted of 13 males (13/33) and had a median age of 56 years (interquartile ranges: 49-64). Median follow-up was 59 months (interquartile ranges: 23-126)., Results: Unplanned reoperations occurred in eight of 33 patients. The most common reasons for reoperation were irrigation and debridement for infection, revision surgery for persistent nonunion, and unplanned hardware removal. In total, 10 complications occurred in nine patients. The most common complications were infection and persistent nonunion; both occurred in three cases., Conclusions: Complications after distal radius nonunion repair are common. Reoperation after distal radius nonunion repair is required in approximately one of four cases., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Prognosis IV., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly to this article., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Arthrodesis of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint of the thumb is a common procedure to treat arthritis or instability. Studies reporting hardware complications and nonunion rates after thumb MCP joint arthrodesis report on small sample sizes. We aimed to describe the hardware complication rate, the nonunion rate, and the number of thumbs that achieve union among patients undergoing thumb MCP joint arthrodesis., Methods: A database spanning 5 urban hospitals in a single metropolitan region in the United States was searched for patients who underwent thumb MCP joint arthrodesis between January 1, 2004 and January 1, 2020. After reviewing patient records, we identified 122 thumbs that underwent MCP joint arthrodesis and had a minimum follow-up of 90 days. The primary outcome was unplanned reoperation after hardware complications and nonunion. Second, the number of thumbs that achieved radiographic union was reported for the tension band and screw fixation arthrodesis group., Results: Twenty-two (18%) out of 122 thumbs had hardware complications after thumb MCP joint arthrodesis, and 11 (9%) out of 122 thumbs developed a nonunion. Patients who underwent screw fixation arthrodesis had no events of hardware complications and subsequent hardware removal. The nonunion rate was 9/65 (14%) in the tension band arthrodesis group and 2 (4%) of 45 in the screw fixation arthrodesis group. Of the thumbs that had available radiographs to assess the healing of the arthrodesis, 34 (81%) of 42 were radiographically united in the tension band arthrodesis group and 29 (91%) of 32 in the screw fixation group., Conclusions: Our data suggest that screw fixation has fewer hardware complications and a lower reoperation rate than tension band arthrodesis., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Prognosis IV., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We undertook a cost-utility analysis to compare traditional fasciectomy for Dupuytren with 2 new treatments, needle aponeurotomy and collagenase injection., Methods: We constructed an expected-value decision analysis model with an arm representing each treatment. A survey was administered to a cohort of 50 consecutive subjects to determine utilities of different interventions. We conducted multiple sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of varying the rate of disease recurrence in each arm of the analysis as well as the cost of the collagenase injection. The threshold for a cost-effective treatment is based on the traditional willingness-to-pay of $50,000 per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained., Results: The cost of open partial fasciectomy was $820,114 per QALY gained over no treatment. The cost of needle aponeurotomy was $96,474 per QALY gained versus no treatment. When we performed a sensitivity analysis and set the success rate at 100%, the cost of needle aponeurotomy was $49,631. When needle aponeurotomy was performed without surgical center or anesthesia costs and with reduced hand therapy, the cost was $36,570. When a complete collagenase injection series was priced at $250, the cost was $31,856 per QALY gained. When the injection series was priced at $945, the cost was $49,995 per QALY gained. At the market price of $5,400 per injection, the cost was $166,268 per QALY gained., Conclusions: In the current model, open partial fasciectomy is not cost-effective. Needle aponeurotomy is cost-effective if the success rate is high. Collagenase injection is cost-effective when priced under $945., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Economic and Decision Analysis II., (Copyright © 2011 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Previous in vivo and in vitro studies of forearm supination-pronation suggest that distal radioulnar joint kinematics may be affected by elbow flexion. The primary hypotheses tested by this study were that, in vivo, ulnar variance changes with elbow flexion and forearm rotation, and the arc of forearm rotation changes in relationship to elbow flexion., Methods: Changes in radioulnar kinematics during forearm supination-pronation and elbow flexion (0 degrees to 90 degrees ) were studied in 5 uninjured subjects using computed tomography, dual-orthogonal fluoroscopy, and 3-dimensional modeling. Analysis of variance and post-hoc testing was performed., Results: Proximal translation of the radius was greatest with the elbow flexed to 90 degrees with the arm in midpronation. With the arm in midpronation, the translation of the radius was significantly greater at 0 degrees versus 45 degrees of elbow flexion (0.82 +/- 0.59 mm vs 0.65 +/- 0.80 mm, F: 4.49, post hoc: 0.055; p = .05) and significantly smaller at 45 degrees versus 90 degrees of elbow flexion (0.65 +/- 0.80 mm vs 0.97 +/- 0.35 mm, F: 4.49, post hoc: 0.048; p = .05). Proximal translation of the radius in midpronation was significantly greater than when the forearm was in a supinated position when the elbow was at 0 degrees or 90 degrees flexion (F: 14.90, post hoc: <0.01; p < .01, F: 19.11, post hoc: <0.01, p < .01). The arc of forearm rotation was significantly decreased at 0 degrees compared with 90 degrees of elbow flexion (129.3 degrees +/- 22.2 degrees vs 152.8 degrees +/- 14.4 degrees , F: 3.29, post hoc: 0.79; p = .09). The center of rotation shifted volarly and ulnarly with increasing elbow extension., Conclusions: Elbow position affects the kinematics of the distal radioulnar joint. The kinematics of the distal radioulnar joint are primarily affected by forearm rotation and secondarily by elbow flexion. These findings have clinical relevance to our understanding of ulnar impaction, and how elbow position affects the proximal-distal translation of the radius. These findings have implications for the treatment of ulna impaction, radiographic evaluation of the distal ulna, and future biomechanical studies.

Decision analysis is a method of probabilistic reasoning and decision-making under conditions of uncertainty. These methods are being used increasingly in hand surgery and medicine in general. It is important for hand surgeons to understand these techniques and how to interpret the results from these studies. Performing a decision analysis involves (1) defining a specific question, (2) creating a model to frame the question, (3) assigning value to outcomes in the model, (4) assigning probabilities to chance events in the model, (5) identifying the best strategy within the model, (6) sensitivity analysis, and (7) model refinement. It is important to recognize the limitations inherent in decision analysis but also to understand its value in overcoming clinical uncertainty by employing a practical technique of modeling choices and outcomes.