Search

PURPOSE To compare the eye with chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma (CPACG) with its fellow eye without glaucoma damage and to determine the biometric differences that may predispose to development of CPACG. METHODS Consecutive patients diagnosed with CPACG in 1 eye and primary angle-closure (PAC)/primary angle-closure suspected (PACS) in the fellow eye were recruited. The biometric parameters of both the eyes were measured by A-scan ultrasonic biometry and ultrasound biomicroscopy. Comparisons of visual function, baseline intraocular pressure (IOP), and the biometric measurements were made. RESULTS Forty-one patients were recruited. Eyes with CPACG had worse visual function, higher baseline IOP, and larger cup-to-disc ratio than their fellow eyes with PAC/PACS (P

Purpose To compare retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular thickness measurements using time-domain optical coherence tomography (TD OCT) and 2 Fourier-domain OCTs (FD OCT). Methods Sixty eyes of 60 normal participants underwent eye examination followed by OCT evaluation with the time-domain Stratus OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. Dublin, CA) and 2 FD OCTs-the Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. Dublin, CA) and the 3D OCT-1000 (Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Each patient was scanned 3 times on each machine by the same physician examiner. RNFL and macular thickness measurements were compared across the 3 devices using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparison t tests with Bonferroni adjustments. The coefficients of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to assess reproducibility. Bland-Altman plots were constructed to assess the level of agreement between every 2 OCTs. Results All 3 machines revealed similar patterns of regional differences in RNFL and macular thicknesses. Macular thickness was consistently greatest on the Cirrus and lowest on the Stratus device. However, RNFL measurements were less consistent. The overall average RNFL thickness was 4 μm greater on the Stratus than on the 3D OCT-1000, which was in turn 5 μm greater than on the Cirrus device. Bland-Altman plots showed poor-to-moderate agreement in terms of macular and RNFL thickness measurements between each 2 of the OCT devices. Both FD OCTs provided more reproducible readings on macular measurements than the Stratus, as evidenced by the lower CV and higher intraclass correlation coefficients. However, RNFL measurements on the 2 FD OCTs were not necessarily more reproducible than those from the Stratus OCT. Conclusion Thickness measurements are not interchangeable among different OCT devices because of the poor-to-moderate interdevice measurement agreement. FD instruments yield more reproducible macular but not RNFL thickness measurements.