Search

Auroral particle precipitation is usually assumed to be equally strong for both signs of the By component of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF). This is also the case in most currently used precipitation models, which parameterize solar wind driving by empirical coupling functions. However, recent studies have showed that geomagnetic activity is significantly modulated by the signs and amplitudes of IMF By and the Earth's dipole tilt angle Ψ. This so called explicit By dependence is not yet included in any current precipitation models. In this paper, we quantify this By dependence for auroral electron precipitation for the first time. We use precipitation measurements of the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) Special Sensor J instruments from years 1995–2022. We show that the dawnside electron precipitation at energies 13.9–30 keV is greater at auroral latitudes for opposite signs of By and Ψ in both hemispheres, while the dusk sector is mostly unaffected by By and Ψ. For energies below 6.5 keV the By dependence is strong poleward of the auroral oval in the summer hemisphere, also exhibiting a strong dawn‐dusk asymmetry. We also show that By dependence of precipitation modulates ionospheric conductance. Plain Language Summary: Electron precipitation into the Earth's ionosphere creating the aurora borealis is driven by the magnetic field carried by the solar wind. The electron precipitation is known to increase the most, when the magnetic field of the solar wind points to south. The currently used models assume equally strong electron precipitation for eastward and westward solar wind magnetic fields. However, in this paper we show that the electron precipitation is different for duskward and dawnward magnetic fields, and that this magnetic field dependence varies with the season. We show that the electron precipitation is stronger on the dawnside in both hemispheres during the northern hemisphere winter when the solar wind magnetic field points duskward. In northern hemisphere summer the dependence on the magnetic field direction is opposite. We show that the solar wind magnetic field modulates the ionospheric conductivity in a similar way. Key Points: IMF By and Earth's dipole tilt angle Ψ (season) modulate auroral electron precipitationPrecipitation is stronger for 13.9–30 keV at auroral latitudes on the dawnside for both hemispheres, when By and Ψ have opposite signsBy drives a strong dawn‐dusk difference for energies 1.4–6.5 keV in the summer hemisphere [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Based on Global Coupled Ionosphere‐Thermosphere‐Electrodynamics Model, the solution of the 3‐dimensional current in the ionospheric region, the equivalent sheet current and filed‐aligned current are examined. The simulation study enables a comprehensive analysis of the effect of the geomagnetic field configuration, especially the non‐dipole component and tilt angle, on the ionospheric electrodynamics phenomena. Different geomagnetic field configurations are specified in the present work, including realistic geomagnetic field (RGF), tilted dipole geomagnetic field (TDGF) and zero‐declination dipole geomagnetic field (ZDGF). Our simulation focuses on the seasonal variation of Sq current, primarily governed by annual and semi‐annual variation. The modulation of the tilt angle of the geomagnetic field is globally distributed, whereas the modulation of the geomagnetic anomaly is localized. At mid‐latitudes, the annual mean and semi‐annual amplitudes of the Sq current are negatively correlated with the magnetic field strength, especially shown in geomagnetic anomaly area, while there is the opposite effect in the geomagnetic conjugate regions of the opposite hemispheres. The annual variation of Sq current system is more affected by the offset of the geomagnetic latitudes and geographical latitudes. The seasonal variation of the total Sq current is also modulated by the geomagnetic field. The annual mean, the annual and semi‐annual components of the total Sq current are negatively correlated with the magnetic field strength, while the annual variation is also controlled by the tilt angle of the geomagnetic field. The solar radiation affects the semi‐annual variation of the current more strongly than the annual variation. Plain Language Summary: Ionospheric currents and magnetic fields exert significant influences on energy and material transport within the ionosphere, playing a pivotal role in Earth's electromagnetic environment, which is the primary focus of ionospheric research. To investigate the impact of the geomagnetic field on the ionospheric current system, we employ a theoretical model (GCITEM) for simulation work. In this simulation, we consider both the realistic geomagnetic field configuration and two hypothetical idealized configurations of the geomagnetic field: one excluding non‐dipole terms and the other further aligning the geomagnetic axis with Earth's spin axis. The analysis of the longitude and the seasonal variation of the simulated currents under realistic magnetic field conditions has been validated through previous observation results. In comparison to simulation results obtained under hypothetical configurations, we discern and analyze the modulation and mechanism of non‐dipole terms and the tilt angle of geomagnetic field on the variability of the ionospheric current system, which are discussed in detail within this paper. This study facilitates the analysis and prediction of long‐term changes in the geomagnetic field's effects on ionospheric current generation and the impact on space's electromagnetic environment. Key Points: The geomagnetic field intensity exerts a significant influence on the Sq currents and exhibits a negative correlation with Sq currentThe annual mean and annual variation amplitude of Sq current are positively correlated with the geomagnetic anomaly at conjugate pointsThe tilt angle of the geomagnetic field affects the annual variation of Sq current globally, but hardly effects the semiannual variation [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ions in the F region ionosphere at 150–400 km altitude consist mainly of molecular NO+ and O2+ ${\mathrm{O}}_{2}^{+}$, and atomic O+. Incoherent scatter (IS) radars are sensitive to the molecular‐to‐atomic ion density ratio, but its effect to the observed incoherent scatter spectra is almost identical with that of the ion temperature. It is thus very difficult to fit both the ion temperature and the fraction of O+ ions to the observed spectra. In this paper, we introduce a novel combination of Bayesian filtering, smoothness priors, and chemistry modeling to solve for F1 region O+ ion fraction from EISCAT Svalbard IS radar (75.43° corrected geomagnetic latitude) data during the international polar year (IPY) 2007–2008. We find that the fraction of O+ ions in the F1 region ionosphere is controlled by ion temperature and electron production. The median value of the molecular‐to‐atomic ion transition altitude during IPY varies from 187 km at 16–17 MLT to 208 km at 04–05 MLT. The ion temperature has maxima at 05–06 MLT and 15–16 MLT, but the transition altitude does not follow the ion temperature, because photoionization lowers the transition altitude. A daytime transition altitude maximum is observed in winter, when lack of photoionization leads to very low daytime electron densities. Both ion temperature and the molecular‐to‐atomic ion transition altitude correlate with the Polar Cap North geomagnetic index. The annual medians of the fitted transition altitudes are 14–32 km lower than those predicted by the International Reference Ionosphere. Plain Language Summary: Ions in the F region ionosphere at 150–400 km altitudes consist mainly of molecular NO+ and O2+ ${\mathrm{O}}_{2}^{+}$, and atomic O+. Incoherent scatter radars are sensitive to the molecular‐to‐atomic ion density ratio, but its effect to the observed incoherent scatter spectra is almost identical with that of the ion temperature. It is thus very difficult to fit both the ion temperature and the fraction of O+ ions to the observed spectra. This causes bias to the fitted temperatures and leaves behavior of the F1 region ion composition poorly known. We apply a novel combination of inverse mathematics and chemistry modeling to analysis of EISCAT Svalbard incoherent scatter radar data, and solve for both the ion temperature and the fraction of O+ ions at the same time. We find that the ion composition is considerably different from a standard model, that it undergoes regular diurnal variations, and it is affected by geomagnetic activity. The typical variations can be qualitatively explained by known diurnal variations in ion temperature, solar photoionization, and ion chemistry. When the ionosphere above Svalbard is in almost complete darkness in mid‐winter, ion composition in the daytime ionosphere is considerably different from that observed during the other seasons. Key Points: We use novel data analysis techniques and chemistry modeling to fit atomic oxygen ion fractions to EISCAT Svalbard radar data during IPYWe characterize the F1 region ion composition dependence on local time, solar zenith angle, and geomagnetic activityThe molecular‐to‐atomic ion transition altitudes are 14–32 km lower than those predicted by the International Reference Ionosphere [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

STEVE, Strong Thermal Emission Velocity Enhancement, was often observed by ground‐based imagers in visible wavelengths and rarely detected by global FUV imagers. We present a new event, and revisit two reported STEVE events, that were observed by the DMSP/SSUSI FUV imager at O 135.6 nm, N2 LBHS, and LBHL emissions. Coincident particle and plasma drift observations showed that the events were associated with high ion drift speed, low ion density and no energetic particle precipitation. This is consistent with earlier findings (e.g., MacDonald et al., 2018, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaq0030; Gallardo‐Lacourt et al., 2018a, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ja025368, 2018b, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018gl078509; Archer et al., 2019). In this paper, several new features are identified: (a) Detection rates of FUV STEVE are much lower than that of visible STEVE; (b) The STEVE on 27 March 2008 covers 3‐hr local time with a length up to 2,700 km around 60° magnetic latitudes; (c) Different widths of STEVE observed in O 135.6 nm and N2 LBH images indicate a large altitude range in the STEVE FUV emissions; (d) The true ion (assuming O+) drift speeds during the 27 March 2008 STEVE event could be up to 20 km/s, well above the DMSP SSIES sensor limit. The kinetic energy of the high speed ions is larger than the excitation potential of the observed FUV emissions; (e) The requirement of such extreme high ion drift speed explains why FUV STEVE have been rarely observed, compared to the visible STEVE; (f) The three FUV STEVE events occurred during moderate geomagnetic activity; (g) Theses events were conjugate in both hemispheres. Plain Language Summary: STEVE, Strong Thermal Emission Velocity Enhancement, was discovered by ground‐based imagers in visible wavelengths. We present examples of STEVE detected by FUV imager at O 135.6 nm, N2 LBHS (140–150 nm), and LBHL (165–180 nm) emissions. These FUV STEVE events were associated with high plasma drift speed and low plasma density in the ionosphere, and no energetic particle precipitation. These FUV STEVE events show several new features: (a) Detection rates of FUV STEVE are much lower than that of visible STEVE; (b) The STEVE length is up to 2,700 km; (c) There is a large altitude range of the FUV emission; (d) The true ion (assuming O+) drift speeds could be up to 20 km/s. Ions with such a high drift speed would carry sufficient kinetic energy to excite FUV emissions; (e) The FUV STEVE events occurred during moderate geomagnetic activity; and (f) The FUV STEVE events were conjugate in both hemispheres. Key Points: In addition to the visible emissions, STEVE is also observed in far ultraviolet emissionsThe STEVE on 27 March 2008 has a horizontal length up to 2,700 km and a large altitude extensionEstimated O+ ion drift speed for some STEVE events is ∼20 km/s and the ions' kinetic energy is greater than the FUV excitation potential [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]