1. Measurement of differential rupture duration as constraints on the source finiteness of deep-focus earthquakes: 2. Synthetic tests to estimate errors in rupture vectors and their effect on fault plane identification
- Author
-
L. M. Warren
- Subjects
Seismic gap ,Atmospheric Science ,Soil Science ,Aquatic Science ,Fault (geology) ,Oceanography ,Directivity ,Geochemistry and Petrology ,Orientation (geometry) ,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) ,Differential (infinitesimal) ,Earth-Surface Processes ,Water Science and Technology ,Deep-focus earthquake ,geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,Ecology ,Subduction ,Paleontology ,Forestry ,Geodesy ,Identification (information) ,Geophysics ,Space and Planetary Science ,Geology ,Seismology - Abstract
[1] The directivity method of Warren and Silver (2006) has been used to distinguish the fault planes of deep earthquakes in the Tonga and Middle America subduction zones. These studies identified exclusively subhorizontal fault planes between 100 and 300 km depth, raising the question of whether the observations represent new constraints on the physical mechanism of the earthquakes or a bias in the methodology. Here, the strengths, weaknesses, and biases of the method are investigated through the comprehensive analysis of 120 synthetic earthquakes with varying depth, rupture vector orientation, rupture complexity, signal-to-noise ratio, and station distribution. These synthetic tests, which allow the evaluation of the effect of each of the varied parameters on the rupture vector determination, show that fault planes can be identified for a wide variety of conditions. The method underestimates rupture velocities by 76%–94%, but this does not affect the determination of the orientation of the rupture vector. The most important parameter for determining the orientation of the rupture vector, and thereby allowing identification of the fault plane, is the distribution of stations recording the earthquake; better coverage around the earthquakes results in tighter constraints on the rupture vector. The broader distribution of recording stations for deeper earthquakes results in tighter constraints on the rupture vectors for deeper earthquakes and, therefore, more ease in identifying the fault plane. However, the difference in resolution does not systematically prohibit the identification of certain orientations of fault planes at shallower depths and suggests that previous observations of exclusively subhorizontal fault planes between 100 and 300 km depth are not the result of systematic bias in the methodology. Instead, the observed dominance of subhorizontal fault planes provides important constraints on the physical mechanism of intermediate-depth earthquakes. The observed subhorizontal fault orientation is inconsistent with the reactivation of the dominant trenchward-dipping outer rise normal faults.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF