Search

Kv7 K(+)-channel subunits differ in their apparent affinity for PIP(2) and are differentially expressed in nerve, muscle, and epithelia in accord with their physiological roles in those tissues. To investigate how PIP(2) affinity affects the response to physiological stimuli such as receptor stimulation, we exposed homomeric and heteromeric Kv7.2, 7.3, and 7.4 channels to a range of concentrations of the muscarinic receptor agonist oxotremorine-M (oxo-M) in a heterologous expression system. Activation of M(1) receptors by oxo-M leads to PIP(2) depletion through G(q) and phospholipase C (PLC). Chinese hamster ovary cells were transiently transfected with Kv7 subunits and M(1) receptors and studied under perforated-patch voltage clamp. For Kv7.2/7.3 heteromers, the EC(50) for current suppression was 0.44 +/- 0.08 microM, and the maximal inhibition (Inhib(max)) was 74 +/- 3% (n = 5-7). When tonic PIP(2) abundance was increased by overexpression of PIP 5-kinase, the EC(50) was shifted threefold to the right (1.2 +/- 0.1 microM), but without a significant change in Inhib(max) (73 +/- 4%, n = 5). To investigate the muscarinic sensitivity of Kv7.3 homomers, we used the A315T pore mutant (Kv7.3(T)) that increases whole-cell currents by 30-fold without any change in apparent PIP(2) affinity. Kv7.3(T) currents had a slightly right-shifted EC(50) as compared with Kv7.2/7.3 heteromers (1.0 +/- 0.8 microM) and a strongly reduced Inhib(max) (39 +/- 3%). In contrast, the dose-response curve of homomeric Kv7.4 channels was shifted considerably to the left (66 +/- 8 nM), and Inhib(max) was slightly increased (81 +/- 6%, n = 3-4). We then studied several Kv7.2 mutants with altered apparent affinities for PIP(2) by coexpressing them with Kv7.3(T) subunits to boost current amplitudes. For the lower affinity (Kv7.2 (R463Q)/Kv7.3(T)) or higher affinity (Kv7.2 (R463E)/Kv7.3(T)) channels, the EC(50) and Inhib(max) were similar to Kv7.4 or Kv7.3(T) homomers (0.12 +/- 0.08 microM and 79 +/- 6% [n = 3-4] and 0.58 +/- 0.07 microM and 27 +/- 3% [n = 3-4], respectively). The very low-affinity Kv7.2 (R452E, R459E, and R461E) triple mutant was also coexpressed with Kv7.3(T). The resulting heteromer displayed a very low EC(50) for inhibition (32 +/- 8 nM) and a slightly increased Inhib(max) (83 +/- 3%, n = 3-4). We then constructed a cellular model that incorporates PLC activation by oxo-M, PIP(2) hydrolysis, PIP(2) binding to Kv7-channel subunits, and K(+) current through Kv7 tetramers. We were able to fully reproduce our data and extract a consistent set of PIP(2) affinities.

The regulation of M-type (KCNQ [Kv7]) K(+) channels by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP(2)) has perhaps the best correspondence to physiological signaling, but the site of action and structural motif of PIP(2) on these channels have not been established. Using single-channel recordings of chimeras of Kv7.3 and 7.4 channels with highly differential PIP(2) sensitivities, we localized a carboxy-terminal inter-helix linker as the primary site of PIP(2) action. Point mutants within this linker in Kv7.2 and Kv7.3 identified a conserved cluster of basic residues that interact with the lipid using electrostatic and hydrogen bonds. Homology modeling of this putative PIP(2)-binding linker in Kv7.2 and Kv7.3 using the solved structure of Kir2.1 and Kir3.1 channels as templates predicts a structure of Kv7.2 and 7.3 very similar to the Kir channels, and to the seven-beta-sheet barrel motif common to other PIP(2)-binding domains. Phosphoinositide-docking simulations predict affinities and interaction energies in accord with the experimental data, and furthermore indicate that the precise identity of residues in the interacting pocket alter channel-PIP(2) interactions not only by altering electrostatic energies, but also by allosterically shifting the structure of the lipid-binding surface. The results are likely to shed light on the general structural mechanisms of phosphoinositide regulation of ion channels.