Search

To examine the role of development in the origin of evolutionary novelties, we investigated the developmental mechanisms involved in the formation of a complex morphological novelty-branched feathers. We demonstrate that the anterior-posterior expression polarity of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) and Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (Bmp2) in the primordia of feathers, avian scales, and alligator scales is conserved and phylogenetically primitive to archosaurian integumentary appendages. In feather development, derived patterns of Shh-Bmp2 signaling are associated with the development of evolutionarily novel feather structures. Longitudinal Shh-Bmp2 expression domains in the marginal plate epithelium between barb ridges provide a prepattern of the barbs and rachis. Thus, control of Shh-Bmp2 signaling is a fundamental component of the mechanism determining feather form (i.e., plumulaceous vs. pennaceous structure). We show that Shh signaling is necessary for the formation and proper differentiation of a barb ridge and that it is mediated by Bmp signaling. BMP signaling is necessary and sufficient to negatively regulate Shh expression within forming feather germs and this epistatic relationship is conserved in scale morphogenesis. Ectopic SHH and BMP2 signaling leads to opposing effects on proliferation and differentiation within the feather germ, suggesting that the integrative signaling between Shh and Bmp2 is a means to regulate controlled growth and differentiation of forming skin appendages. We conclude that Shh and Bmp signaling is necessary for the formation of barb ridges in feathers and that Shh and Bmp2 signaling constitutes a functionally conserved developmental signaling module in archosaur epidermal appendage development. We propose a model in which branched feather form evolved by repeated, evolutionary re-utilization of a Shh-Bmp2 signaling module in new developmental contexts. Feather animation Quicktime movies can be viewed at http://fallon.anatomy.wisc.edu/feather.html., (Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

The turtle shell, an evolutionarily novel structure, contains a bony exoskeleton that includes a dorsal carapace and a ventral plastron. The development of the carapace is dependent on the carapacial ridge (CR), a bulge in the dorsal flank that contains an ectodermal structure analogous to the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) of the developing limb (Burke. 1989a. J Morphol 199:363-378; Burke. 1989b. Fortschr Zool 35:206-209). Although the CR is thought to mediate the initiation and outgrowth of the carapace, the mechanisms of shell development have not been studied on the molecular level. Here, we present data suggesting that carapace formation is initiated by co-opting genes that had other functions in the ancestral embryo, specifically those of limb outgrowth. However, there is divergence in the signaling repertoire from that involved in limb initiation and outgrowth. In situ hybridizations with antisense riboprobes derived from Trionyx spiniferous fibroblast growth factor-10 (tfgf10) and Trachemys scripta (T. scripta) fibroblast-growth factor 8 (tfgf8) cDNAs were performed on sections of early T. scripta embryos (< 30 days). Expression of tfgf10 was localized to the mesenchyme subjacent to the ectoderm of the CR. In the chick limb bud, FGF10 is known to be expressed in the early limb-forming mesenchyme and is capable of inducing FGF8 in the AER to initiate the outgrowth of the limb bud. Although the expression of tfgf8 was found in the AER of the developing turtle limb, it was not seen in the CR. Thus, the initiation of the carapace is in agreement with FGF10 expression in the CR, but FGF8 does not appear to have a role in mediating early carapace outgrowth., (Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

We grafted normal flank ectoderm to the denuded presumptive wing bud mesoderm of stages 14-15 wingless embryos. When this was done, the wingless wing bud mesoderm was capable of inducing a ridge in the grafted ectoderm, maintaining that ridge, and growing out to form a wing. However, when stage 17-18 wingless wing bud mesoderm was combined with a normal leg bud ectodermal jacket, the recombinant bud failed to grow out to form a wing (Zwilling, '56a; and this report). When normal ectoderm was first grafted to a wingless host at stages 14-15, and the resulting stage 18 wing bud was removed and then the mesoderm recombined with a normal ectodermal jacket, the double recombinant bud could form a distally complete wing. However, these wings had some deficiencies compared to similar double recombinants made with normal mesoderm. These results show, first, that the ectoderm is affected by the wingless gene and, second, that there may be a prelimb bud stage interaction between wingless ectoderm and mesoderm such that, by stage 17, the wingless mesoderm becomes defective as a result of the ectodermally expressed mutation. Deficiencies in wingless mesoderm double recombinants indicate that the mesoderm may be sensitive to manipulation, possibly because the ectoderm has affected the mesoderm to some extent before stage 14. We believe it is not possible to determine the affected germ layer in wingless after the limb bud arises. However, after using the prelimb bud recombinant technique which we have designed, it becomes apparent that the ectoderm is affected by the wingless gene.

The negative results of assays for polarizing activity along the posterior border of the chick wing 24 and 48 hours after removal of the polarizing zone demonstrate that this zone is not regenerated following removal. These results, and the fact that normal wing development can occur after polarizing zone removal from stages 15 through 24 wing buds, indicate that during these stages the polarizing zone has no direct role in normal development of the limb bud. It is speculated that the polarizing zone is effective only during limb induction and that after this time it exists in latent or residual form.

We have examined the fate of cultured stage 20 and 25 dorsal and ventral wing bud epithelia and have found evidence that the requirements of apical ectodermal ridge and nonridge limb ectoderms for in vitro survival are different. As previously reported for the apical ectodermal ridge (Boutin and Fallon, '84), dorsal and ventral ectoderms were extensively necrotic after 12 hours of culture in serum-containing medium. The survival of dorsal and ventral limb epithelia at 18 hours was not improved by a collagen substratum, 10% Nuserum, epidermal growth factor, nerve growth factor, multiplication-stimulating activity, insulin, or insulin, transferrin, and selenium. This is in contrast to our observations on the ridge which remains vital for at least 24 hours in insulin or insulin, transferrin, and selenium.

The normal timing and appearance of feather germs was perturbed by injecting the dye Janus Green B into the amniotic fluid of chick embryos at late stage 28, prior to the first appearance of feather germs. This treatment prevented feather germ morphogenesis in some regions while elsewhere it delayed normal morphological development. The Janus Green B effect lasted for approximately 98 hours. Feather regions, which normally form epidermal placodes during the period of treatment, showed the longest delays in subsequent feather germ formation and were the most likely to remain featherless. These results suggest that the epidermal placode stage is critical for feather germ formation. Janus Green B appears to prevent feather germ morphogenesis by interfering with development prior to this critical stage. Since severely affected regions fail to recover their capacity to form feather germs, even after the period of sensitivity to the dye, a limited period of competence is suggested for feather germ formation.