Search

Rationale, aims and objectives In the current context, the assessment of the quality of care in daily clinical practice becomes essential. The aim of this study was to use medical basic datasets associated with information on pharmacological treatments to assess the quality of care of a prophylaxis treatment after major orthopaedic surgery and to compare hospitals' clinical practices. Methods The study was performed in 20 Belgian hospitals. Patients who underwent total hip replacement (THR), total knee replacement (TKR), or hip fracture surgery (HFS) were selected retrospectively from the hospitals' 2002 and 2003 administrative databases (n = 14 991). Quality indicators assessed were incidence of venous thromboembolism, major bleeding and death. Prophylaxis analysed were enoxaparin, nadroparin and fondaparinux. Results Venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events were rare (1.9% and 1.1% respectively). Patients who underwent HFS were at greater risk of having pulmonary embolism [OR = 2.01; confidence interval (CI) = 1.38-2.92; P = 0.0002], major bleeding (OR = 4.00; CI = 2.93-5.46; P < 0.0001) or death from any cause (OR = 8.86; CI = 6.85-11.45; P < 0.0001) than patients who underwent THR or TKR. Multivariate analyses showed that the hospital variable had a significant impact on the probability to have adverse events and that patients who received enoxaparin were at greater risk of death than patients who received nadroparin (OR(enoxaparin vs fraxiparin) = 1.59; 95% CI = 1.04-2.44; P = 0.033). Conclusion Results indicate that differences in thromboembolism prophylaxis practices among hospitals have a significant impact on adverse events. This reinforces the need to develop data-processing tools that enable better monitoring of quality of care.

Rationale, aims and objectives 'Real world data' are needed to assess the quality of pharmacological treatments in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to determine whether administrative databases can be used to assess the quality of prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin after major orthopaedic surgery. Methods The study was performed in a Belgian university hospital. Patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR), total knee replacement (TKR) or hip fracture surgery (HFS) were selected retrospectively from the hospital's 2002 and 2003 administrative databases. Readmissions during the same year as the procedure were also analysed. Three quality indicators were assessed: incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding and death; adherence to guidelines; and the costs of care. Results Although 70% of data were collected from administrative databases, patients' records also had to be examined. During the period studied, VTE and major bleeding events were rare. Patients undergoing HFS were at greater risk of having a pulmonary embolism [Exact odds ratio (OR) = 3.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.13-16.22; P = 0.03] or of death from any cause (Exact OR = 2.15; 95% CI = 1.52-infinity; P < 0.01) than patients undergoing THR or TKR. The hospital's prophylaxis protocol was not always followed. Half the patients received higher prophylaxis doses than recommended and 11% received lower doses but no impact on adverse events was demonstrated. Conclusion Results show that administrative databases contain enough information to measure the frequency of adverse events but complementary data on patient weight and on non-reimbursed drugs must be extracted from the patients' records to evaluate adherence to guidelines. Our findings stress the need for better integration of information systems.

In the current context, the assessment of the quality of care in daily clinical practice becomes essential. The aim of this study was to use medical basic datasets associated with information on pharmacological treatments to assess the quality of care of a prophylaxis treatment after major orthopaedic surgery and to compare hospitals' clinical practices.The study was performed in 20 Belgian hospitals. Patients who underwent total hip replacement (THR), total knee replacement (TKR), or hip fracture surgery (HFS) were selected retrospectively from the hospitals' 2002 and 2003 administrative databases (n = 14,991). Quality indicators assessed were incidence of venous thromboembolism, major bleeding and death. Prophylaxis analysed were enoxaparin, nadroparin and fondaparinux.Venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events were rare (1.9% and 1.1% respectively). Patients who underwent HFS were at greater risk of having pulmonary embolism [OR = 2.01; confidence interval (CI) = 1.38-2.92; P = 0.0002], major bleeding (OR = 4.00; CI = 2.93-5.46; P0.0001) or death from any cause (OR = 8.86; CI = 6.85-11.45; P0.0001) than patients who underwent THR or TKR. Multivariate analyses showed that the hospital variable had a significant impact on the probability to have adverse events and that patients who received enoxaparin were at greater risk of death than patients who received nadroparin (OR(enoxaparin vs fraxiparin) = 1.59; 95% CI = 1.04-2.44; P = 0.033).Results indicate that differences in thromboembolism prophylaxis practices among hospitals have a significant impact on adverse events. This reinforces the need to develop data-processing tools that enable better monitoring of quality of care.