Search

The Fukushima-labeled air mass arrival, and later the cesium-134 ( 134 Cs), cesium-137 ( 137 Cs) and particulate iodine-131 (hereafter noted 131 I p ) maximum levels were registered in Europe at different dates depending on the location. Most of those data were obtained at low-altitude sampling areas. Here, we compare the airborne levels registered at different high-altitude European locations (from 850 m to about 3500 m). The integrated 137 Cs activity concentration was not uniform with regard to the altitude even after a long travel time/distance from Japan. Moreover, the relation of integrated 137 Cs vs. altitude showed a linear decrease up to an altitude of about 3000 m. A similar trend was noticed for 131 I p (particulate fraction) while it increased above 3000 m. Comparison with 7 Be activity concentration showed that, as far as the high altitude location is concerned, the 137 Cs and 134 Cs maximum concentrations corresponded to the 7 Be maximum, suggesting downdraft movements from high tropospheric or stratospheric layers to be responsible for 137,134 Cs increase and peak values. This was also confirmed by high potential vorticity and low relative humidity registered during the peak values., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Data from three years of operation of a low-level aerosol sampler and analyzer (RASA) at Schauinsland monitoring station are reported. The system is part of the International Monitoring System (IMS) for verification of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT). The fully automatic system is capable to measure aerosol borne gamma emitters with high sensitivity and routinely quantifies 7Be and 212Pb. The system had a high level of data availability of 90% within the reporting period. A daily screening process rendered 66 tentative identifications of verification relevant radionuclides since the system entered IMS operation in February 2004. Two of these were real events and associated to a plausible source. The remaining 64 cases can consistently be explained by detector background and statistical phenomena. Inter-comparison with data from a weekly sampler operated at the same station shows instabilities of the calibration during the test phase and a good agreement since certification of the system.