Search

Complex interrelationships between landscape-level geoenvironmental factors and natural phenomena have rendered land degradation control measures ineffective. For control to be effective, this study argues that the interactions between different geoenvironmental factors and gully erosion (as an indicator of land degradation) should be more fully investigated and spatially mapped. To do so, gully locations of the Konduran watershed, Iran, were detected in the field and modeled in response to seventeen geoenvironmental factors using three machine learning methods, i.e., multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), random forest (RF), regularized random forest (RRF), and Bayesian generalized linear model (Bayesian GLM). The models' performance was validated, the relationship of gully occurrence with each factor was quantified, the probability of gully erosion (i.e., land degradation) was retrospectively estimated, and the spatially explicit maps of land degradation susceptibility were produced. Based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the RRF and MARS models with AUC = 0.98 achieved the greatest goodness-of-fit with the training dataset, whereas the RF model with AUC = 0.83 showed the greatest ability in predicting future gully occurrences. Further scrutinization using the sensitivity and specificity metrics demonstrated the efficiency of the RF model for correctly classifying the gully (sensitivity-training = 92%; sensitivity-validation = 90%) and non-gully (specificity-training = 95%; specificity-validation = 68%) pixels. Nearly 13% of the study area ended up being the hardest hit region due to their general characteristics of distance from roads and rives, altitude, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) that were identified as the most influential factors in gully erosion occurrence. Given the resolution quality and reliable predictive accuracy, our spatially explicit maps of land susceptibility to gully erosion can be used by authorities and urban planners for identifying the target areas for rehabilitation and making more informed decisions for infrastructure development. Although our study was strictly focused on a certain region, our recommendations and implications are of global significance.

The predicts current and future flood risk in the Kalvan watershed of northwestern Markazi Province, Iran. To do this, 512 flood and non-flood locations were identified and mapped. Twenty flood-risk factors were selected to model flood risk using several machine learning techniques: conditional inference random forest (CIRF), the gradient boosting model (GBM), extreme gradient boosting (XGB) and their ensembles. To investigate the future (year 2050) effects of changing climates and changing land use on future flood risk, a general circulation model (GCM) with representative concentration pathways (RCPs) of the 2.6 and 8.5 scenarios by 2050 was tested for impacts on 8 precipitation variables. In addition, future land uses in 2050 was prepared using a CA-Markov model. The performances of the flood risk models were validated with Receiver Operating Characteristic-Area Under Curve (ROC-AUC) and other statistical analyses. The AUC value of the ROC curve indicates that the ensemble model had the highest predictive power (AUC = 0.83) and was followed by GBM (AUC = 0.80), XGB (AUC = 0.79), and CIRF (AUC = 0.78). The results of climate and land use changes on future flood-prone areas showed that the areas classified as having moderate to very high flood risk will increase by 2050. Due to the changes occurring with land uses and in climates, the area classified as moderate to very high risk increased in the predictions from all four models. The areal proportion classes of the risk zones in 2050 under the RCP 2.6 scenario using the ensemble model have changed of the following proportions from the current distribution Very Low = −12.04 %, Low = −8.56 %, Moderate = +1.56 %, High = +11.55 %, and Very High = +7.49 %. The RCP 8.5 scenario has caused the following changes from the present percentages: Very Low = −14.48 %, Low = −6.35 %, Moderate = +4.54 %, High = +10.61 %, and Very High = +5.67 %. The results of current and future flood risk mapping can aid planners and flood hazard managers in their efforts to mitigate impacts.

The objective of this study is to assess the gully head-cut erosion susceptibility and identify gully erosion prone areas in the Meimand watershed, Iran. In recent years, this study area has been greatly influenced by several head-cut gullies due to unusual climatic factors and human induced activity. The present study is therefore intended to address this issue by developing head-cut gully erosion prediction maps using boosting ensemble machine learning algorithms, namely Boosted Tree (BT), Boosted Generalized Linear Models (BGLM), Boosted Regression Tree (BRT), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Deep Boost (DB). Initially, we produced a gully erosion inventory map using a variety of resources, including published reports, Google Earth images, and field records of the Global Positioning System (GPS). Subsequently, we distributed this information randomly and choose 70% (102) of the test gullies and the remaining 30% (43) for validation. The methodology was designed using morphometric and thematic determinants, including 14 head-cut gully erosion conditioning features. We have also investigated the following: (a) Multi-collinearity analysis to determine the linearity of the independent variables, (b) Predictive capability of piping models using train and test dataset and (c) Variables importance affecting head-cut gully erosion. The study reveals that altitude, land use, distances from road and soil characteristics influenced the method with the greatest impact on head-cut gully erosion susceptibility. We presented five head-cut gully erosion susceptibility maps and investigated their predictive accuracy through area under curve (AUC). The AUC test reveals that the DB machine learning method demonstrated significantly higher accuracy (AUC = 0.95) than the BT (AUC = 0.93), BGLM (AUC = 0.91), BRT (AUC = 0.94) and XGB (AUC = 0.92) approaches. The predicted head-cut gully erosion susceptibility maps can be used by policy makers and local authorities for soil conservation and to prevent threats to human activities.