1. Optimization of the chemolithotrophic denitrification of ion exchange concentrate using hydrogen-based membrane biofilm reactors.
- Author
-
Cruces, Matias, Suárez, José, Nancucheo, Iván, and Schwarz, Alex
- Subjects
- *
MEMBRANE reactors , *ION exchange (Chemistry) , *DENITRIFICATION , *DENITRIFYING bacteria , *COST analysis - Abstract
A H 2 -based membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR) was used to remove nitrate from a synthetic ion-exchange brine made up of 23.8 g L−1 NaCl. To aid the selection of the best nitrate management strategy, our research was based on the integrated analysis of ionic exchange and MBfR processes, including a detailed cost analysis. The nitrate removal flux was not affected if key nutrients were present in the feed solution including potassium and sodium bicarbonate. Operating pH was maintained between 7 and 8. By using a H 2 pressure of 15 psi, a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 4 h, and a surface loading rate of 13.6 ± 0.2 g N m−2 d−1, the average nitrate removal flux was 3.3 ± 0.6 g N m−2 d−1. At HRTs of up to 24 h, the system was able to maintain a removal flux of 1.6 ± 0.2 g N m−2 d−1. Microbial diversity analysis showed that the consortium was dominated by the genera Sulfurimonas and Marinobacter. The estimated cost for a 200 m3/h capacity, coupled ion exchange (IX) + MBfR treatment plant is 0.43 USD/m3. This is a sustainable and competitive alternative to an IX-only plant for the same flowrate. The proposed treatment option allows for brine recycling and reduces costs by 55% by avoiding brine disposal expenses. • A H 2 based MBfR successfully nitrified a synthetic IX spent brine. • The nitrate removal flux was 3.3 ± 0.6 g N/m2-d at 15 psi H2 and 4 h HRT. • Costs for a coupled IX + MBfR treatment plant were estimated at 0.43 USD/m3. • The coupled system is 55% cheaper than IX alone due to avoided brine disposal costs. • The genera Sulfurimonas and Marinobacter dominated the nitrate reducing consortium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF