Search

This study quantifies the financial and environmental impacts of a microalgal bioenergy system that attempts to maximize circular flows by recovering and reusing the carbon, nutrients, and water within the system. The system produces microalgal biomass using liquid digestate of an anaerobic digester that processes 45 metric tons of food waste and generates 28.6 m3 of permeate daily in California, and three energy production scenarios from the biomass are considered: producing biodiesel, electricity, and both. In all scenarios, the resulting energy products delivered only modest reductions in environmental impacts as measured by carbon dioxide equivalent emissions. The carbon intensities (CIs) of biodiesel from this study were 91.0 gCO 2 e/MJ and 93.3 gCO 2 e/MJ, which were lower than 94.71 gCO 2 e/MJ of conventional petroleum diesel, and the CI of electricity from this study was 70.6 gCO 2 e/MJ, lower than the average electricity grid CI in California (82.92 gCO 2 e/MJ). The economic analysis results show that generating electricity alone can be profitable, while biodiesel produced via this system is not cost competitive with conventional diesel due to high capital expenses. Thus, generating electricity in lieu of biodiesel appears to be a better option to maximize the use of waste flows and supply lower-carbon energy. [Display omitted] • Permeate from a digester had sufficient nutrients for microalgae cultivation. • Combining anaerobic digestion and microalgae limitedly reduced environmental impacts. • Electricity generation better than biodiesel financially and environmentally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]