Search

There is growing evidence of the benefit of cytoreductive nephrectomy prior to immunotherapy in patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). We compared the outcomes of patients with metastatic RCC undergoing laparoscopic and open cytoreductive nephrectomy prior to systemic therapy.We retrospectively analyzed 27 patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic RCC between 2000 and 2004, 16 laparoscopically and 11 by an open approach. Patients with inferior vena-caval tumor thrombus were excluded from analysis. The two groups were comparable with regard to tumor size, clinical stage, and performance status. Surgical, pathologic, and perioperative characteristics and outcomes were compared.The laparoscopic technique was associated with reduced blood loss (149 v 1135 mL; P = 0.03), transfusion rate and quantity (13% v 55%; P = 0.03; 0.13 v 2.0 units of packed red blood cells; P = 0.007), shorter time to oral intake (1.2 v 2.7 days; P0.001), and shorter hospitalization (3.6 v 6.8 days; P0.001) compared with open nephrectomy. No significant differences were observed with respect to pathologic stage, operative time, complications, fraction receiving subsequent systemic therapy, time to systemic therapy, or survival.Laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy is associated with reduced morbidity and hospital stay compared with open surgery. There was no increase in complications, and the ability to proceed with subsequent systemic therapy was maintained in the majority of patients. The laparoscopic approach can be considered in patients with metastatic RCC as part of a cytoreductive and systemic-therapy regimen.

Debate surrounds laparoscopic kidney procurement for right donor nephrectomy. We detail our pure laparoscopic technique of right kidney retrieval.We use a four-port transperitoneal approach and extract the kidney through a low Pfannenstiel incision. Important elements include: (1) dividing the triangular ligament; (2) identifying the vena cava early; (3) minimizing ureteral dissection; (4) mobilizing the kidney within Gerota's fascia; (5) dissecting the renal artery behind the vena cava; (6) cutting the extraction incision to the peritoneum; (7) applying a Hem-o-Lok and single metal clip on the artery; (8) placing the Endo-TA stapler on the renal vein adjacent to the vena cava; (9) cutting the vessels without clips/staples on the kidney side; and (10) retrieving the kidney manually.This is a reliable method of right pure laparoscopic donor nephrectomy that maximizes donor benefit and cost-effectiveness. Right laparoscopic nephrectomy is likely easier with this technique and should not be avoided if it is the preferred kidney for transplantation.

It is well accepted that identification and control of the adrenal vein is a critical step in laparoscopic adrenalectomy. The surgical and anatomic literature propagates the notion of a dominant or multiple dominant adrenal arteries that should likewise be controlled during surgical extirpation.We assessed the frequency of adrenal-artery identification and the need for formal ligation in an extensive series of laparoscopic adrenalectomies.In our experience, even using a magnified laparoscopic view, we found it possible to identify and necessary to formally ligate an adrenal artery in only 3 of 265 cases (1.1%). Further, in this series, only the inferior adrenal artery was ever seen definitively to require formal clip ligation, while a discrete middle or superior adrenal artery was almost never seen, and the vasculature in these areas could be controlled with electrocautery or ultrasonic energy alone during routine dissection.The need to search for and ligate the arterial supply during laparoscopic adrenalectomy is not as clinically significant as once thought, and formal control appears unnecessary unless the vessels are serendipitously encountered during the routine dissection.

Vascular control is crucial during laparoscopic ligation of the renal vessels. Intracorporeal suture ligation has been replaced by easier methods, such as specialized clip appliers and automatic stapling devices; nevertheless, the optimal application and margin of safety of such devices have yet to be determined. We sought to address this question by measuring the bursting strength of arteries ligated with several standard devices.One end of an adult porcine artery (3-7-mm diameter) was occluded with a titanium clip, self-locking polymer clip, or laparoscopic linear cutting stapler. Comparisons were made with one or two clips and with different distal cuff lengths (i.e., flush or 2 mm). The open end was secured to a pulsatile infusion pump. Leak/failure pressures were measured using a digital barometer.The mean bursting pressures for the clips were above physiologic arterial pressures (1220-1500 mm Hg). However, the vessels closed with the stapler leaked at a lower mean pressure (262 mm Hg). Failure of titanium or self-locking polymer clips was the result of vessel retraction into and behind the clip, while staple- line leakage occurred between individual staples. Bursting pressures with the titanium and self-locking polymer clips was unaffected by the number of clips or length of vascular cuff.All tested methods of vascular control performed well at physiologic pressures, suggesting that safety is not increased with traditional maneuvers such as additional clips or longer cuff length.

Kidney morcellation permits tissue removal through a port site; however, standard methods of histopathologic examination of the numerous specimen fragments thus produced have not been established. We developed a model to guide pathologic evaluation of the morcellated kidney.A mathematical model was created to determine the quantity of morcellated tissue needed to establish a diagnosis. Inputs into the equation included estimated lesion size, total specimen volume, and the desired certainty of identifying at least a portion of the lesion on pathologic analysis. Nomograms were calculated to illustrate the model and provide clinically relevant guidelines.The hypergeometric distribution was used to develop the formula: P = 1 - (1 - k/N)(n), where k/N represents the fraction of total specimen with tumor, n is the amount of specimen that must be sampled to yield a diagnosis, and P is the probability of encountering the tumor in the sampled tissue. The model provided nomograms that were feasible and would guide a practical approach to the pathologic analysis of laparoscopically morcellated specimens.The increasing application of laparoscopy to the removal of solid organs with suspected tumors has raised several important issues. Morcellation of these specimens precludes traditional pathologic examination and necessitates an alternative method of specimen sampling and diagnosis. We describe a novel, systematic model to assist in the histopathologic examination of morcellated specimens. Issues of pathologic staging remain unresolved, but this sampling system provides a nonarbitrary framework to help arrive at a histologic diagnosis.