Search

Introduction This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of orthopantomography (OPT) for the detection of clinically/surgically confirmed apical periodontitis (AP) without endodontic treatment using cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging as the reference standard. Methods One hundred twenty patients without endodontically treated AP (diseased group) were detected via CBCT imaging using the periapical index system. They were divided into groups of 10 each according to the size of the lesion (2–4.5 mm and 4.6–7 mm) and the anatomic area (incisor, canine/premolar, and molar) in both the upper and lower arches. Another 120 patients with a healthy root and periapex (healthy group) were selected. Each diseased and healthy patient underwent OPT first and a CBCT scan within 40 days of the OPT. The periapical index system was also used to assess AP by OPT. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for OPT images with respect to CBCT imaging were analyzed. The k value was calculated to assess both the interobserver reliability for OPT and the agreement between OPT and CBCT imaging. Results OPT showed low sensitivity (34.2), negative predictive value (59.3), and diagnostic accuracy (65.0) and high specificity (95.8) and positive predictive value (89.1). Interobserver reliability for OPT was substantial (k = 0.71), and agreement between OPT and CBCT imaging was fair (k = 0.30). The best and worst identified AP were located in the lower molar area and the upper/lower incisor area, respectively. Conclusions OPT showed high specificity and positive predictive value. However, overall, it was not an accurate imaging technique for the detection of untreated AP, especially in the incisor area.

Introduction This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography (PAN) for the detection of clinically/surgically confirmed apical periodontitis (AP) in root canal–treated teeth using cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging as the reference standard. Methods Two hundred forty patients with endodontically treated AP (diseased group) were detected via CBCT imaging using the periapical index system. They were divided into groups of 20 each according to lesion size (2–4.5 mm and 4.6–7 mm) and anatomic area (incisor, canine/premolar, and molar) in both the upper and lower arches. Another 240 patients with root filling and a healthy periapex (healthy group) were selected. All diseased and healthy patients underwent PAN first and a CBCT scan within 40 days. The periapical index system was also used to assess AP using PAN. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for PAN images with respect to CBCT imaging were analyzed. The k value was calculated to assess both the interobserver reliability for PAN and the agreement between PAN and CBCT. Results PAN showed low sensitivity (48.8), mediocre negative predictive value (64.7), good diagnostic accuracy (71.3), and high positive predictive value (88.6) and specificity (93.8). Both interobserver reliability for PAN and agreement between PAN and CBCT were moderate (k = 0.58 and 0.42, respectively). The best identified AP was located in the lower canine/premolar and molar areas, whereas the worst identified AP was located in the upper/lower incisor area and upper molar area. Conclusions PAN showed good diagnostic accuracy, high specificity, and low sensitivity for the detection of endodontically treated AP.