Search

As the prevalence of tramadol toxicity is increasing, managing these patients with the aim of treatment and complete recovery has become a major challenge for health care professionals. This study evaluated the short-term effects of IV lipid emulsion (ILE) administration in cases of tramadol poisoning. In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 120 patients with pure tramadol poisoning and a Glasgow Coma (GCS) score ≤ 12 referred to a poisoning center in Tehran, Iran were selected and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive ILE 20% (intervention) or 0.9% saline (control) after admission and primary stabilization. The patient's vital signs, GCS score, hospitalization duration, and rate of seizure occurrence were recorded and compared between the two groups. Mean (SD) age of participants was 25.3 (5.4) years and 84 (70%) were male. Mean (SD) ingested dose of tramadol was 3118 (244) mg, which was not different between the groups. Compared with controls, the ILE group had a higher level of consciousness after treatment (median [interquartile range] GCS score 12 [10–13] vs. 10 [8–12]; p = 0.03). In addition, length of hospitalization (median [interquartile range] (2 [1–3] days vs. 4 [4–6] days; p < 0.01) and rate of seizure occurrence were lower in the intervention group (16/60 vs. 30/60; p < 0.01). In the setting of tramadol poisoning with a decreased level of consciousness and based on our study's findings, administration of ILE is suggested to help manage patients in hospital emergency departments. However, larger trials might be needed to confirm these findings before entering the guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peripheral venous cannulation is one of the most common procedures in medicine. A larger cannula allows higher rates of fluid to be provided if needed in a deteriorating patient; however, it is also perceived that larger-gauge cannula placement is associated with increased pain and procedural difficulty. This study aimed to compare the pain and procedural difficulty experienced during insertion between 18-gauge (18G) and 20-gauge (20G) cannulas. We conducted a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial on adult patients who required peripheral IV cannulation within a tertiary hospital emergency department between April and October 2018. Patients were randomized to either the 18G or 20G cannula group. The primary outcomes of the study—pain experienced by patients and procedural difficulties experienced by clinical staff—were recorded on two separate 10-cm visual analog scales. Other outcomes include first-attempt success rate, operator designation, complications, and the intent and actual use of the IV cannula were documented on preformatted questionnaires. Data from 178 patients were included in the analysis. Eighty-nine patients were allocated to each cannula group. There were no statistically or clinically significant differences between mean pain score (0.23; 95% CI 0.56–1.02; p = 0.5662) and mean procedural difficulty score (0.12; 95% CI 0.66–0.93; p = 0.7396). between the two groups. There was no difference in first-attempt success rate (73 of 89 vs. 75 of 89; p = 0.1288), complications (2 of 89 vs. 1 of 89) between the 20G group and 18G group, respectively. There was no significant difference between the 18G or 20G cannula for either pain experienced by patients or procedural difficulty experienced by clinicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]