Search

The Singhbhum Shear Zone, eastern India is known for its large uranium and copper resources. Uraninite, the most abundant U-ore mineral, occurs as inclusions in magnetite, ilmenite, apatite, tourmaline, biotite, chlorite and allanite. Shared grain boundaries of uraninite with magnetite and ilmenite are common. Uraninite also shows complex symplectic intergrowth with ilmenite. In some places, the symplectite shares a straight grain boundary with ilmenite and magnetite and is surrounded and enveloped by magnetite. The symplectite could be formed by the reaction of separate U-bearing and Fe–Ti-bearing minerals or by the breakdown of a single U–Ti–Fe-bearing mineral under changed physicochemical conditions. Using the textural settings, geochemistry, and known occurrence of brannerite (UTi2O6) in the shear zone, we propose that the uraninite–ilmenite symplectite is most likely formed by the breakdown of brannerite by interaction with a Fe-bearing hydrothermal fluid. Based on in-situ EPMA chemical dating of uraninite in the symplectite and the known ages of uraninite formation/recrystallization in the shear zone, we further suggest that the symplectite formed during 950±50 Ma, an age which represents a pervasive tectonothermal event in the shear zone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The transition from magmatic to solid-state deformation in granitic rocks is observed either in cases of shear-zone-controlled magma emplacement or in cases of magma-assisted shear-zone nucleation. In the latter case, pre-emplaced granitoid magmas that are later subjected to a dynamic regime with decreasing temperature accommodate stress that causes strain localization. Shear zones in this case are generally restricted to the contact zone between wall rock and granitoid magma, as it represents large viscosity discontinuities. In large granitic provinces (LGPs), however, rheological properties are mainly driven by the changes in physical parameters of granitic magmas, and thus, shear-zone nucleation in magmatic or sub-magmatic conditions cannot be attributed to the viscosity discontinuities caused by the presence of wall rock. Rather, in LGPs, it is only dependent on the rheological discontinuities within the granitic magmas, and thus, a detailed knowledge of the transition from magmatic to solid-state deformation can give important insights into the dynamic history of granitoid magmas in LGPs. The ~2.5 Ga old, voluminous granitoids of Bundelkhand Craton have been affected by multiple shear systems. Among these, the NE–SW and E–W shear systems are major systems that affected the granitoid microstructures. The NE–SW shear system transects the craton as multiple small- and large-scale shear zones, while the E–W shear system is mainly present in the central part of the Bundelkhand Craton. A petrographic study of a ~25 km long, NE–SW trending Baldeogarh shear zone and granite microstructures in associated areas show important magmatic and solid-state deformation features. Overprinting of solid-state deformation over sub-magmatic deformation confirms the progression of deformation with decreasing temperature. Contrary to this, E–W trending microstructures are primarily magmatic to sub-magmatic with rare small-scale solid-state deformation. This indicates that the E–W shear system is older in southern Bundelkhand and was followed by the NE–SW shear system in magmatic conditions. Therefore, the presence of a transition from magmatic to solid-state deformation along the NE–SW trending shear zone indicates that bulk cooling of the granitoid took place while the NE–SW shear system was active. Research Highlights: Transition from magmatic to solid-state deformation in Large Granitic Provinces. Magmatic to solid-state deformation along NE-SW shear zone. Overprinting textures of transition from sub-magmatic to solid-state deformation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]