Search

In this study, dermoscopy was applied to determine the site of skin biopsy in cases of palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) with invisible tiny pustules or vesicles. Fifty‐two clinically diagnosed PPP patients (11 men and 41 women) were observed by a dermoscope and underwent skin biopsy. Nineteen patients had visible pustules, whereas 33 had no visible pustules. Pustules were detected by a dermoscope on palmoplantar lesions in 17 of the 33 PPP patients. In contrast, 16 patients showed no presence of pustules or vesicles observed by a dermoscope. In this group, biopsy specimens were taken from scaly lesions. Out of the 16 patients, 10 histologically showed pustules in the epidermis. We finally detected pustules for 46 patients among 52 who were clinically diagnosed with PPP. As a result, we detected pustules in PPP for 19 patients on "inspection", and 36 patients on "inspection and dermoscopy", and 46 patients on "inspection, dermoscopy, and biopsy". Dermoscopy is significantly useful comparing the detection rate (inspection, 0.41; inspection and dermoscopy, 0.78; p = 0.0003; using χ2‐test). In addition, we also should learn from the results that the detection rate goes down to 0.78 without a biopsy. Thus, dermoscopy is certainly a useful tool for invisible pustules and also undetectable pustules to detect pustules in PPP. Moreover, we objectively showed that "inspection, dermoscopy, and biopsy" are the best way to make a PPP diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) combination is used for the prophylaxis of Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP). Although TMP/SMX is frequently used in dermatology for cases treated with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants, it is often difficult to continue the administration of TMP/SMX due to adverse events. There are only a few reported studies on the prophylaxis of PCP in dermatology. This is the first review focused on adverse events of TMP/SMX among patients with dermatological diseases compared with previous reports. In this study, we retrospectively investigated 132 cases treated with TMP/SMX and examined the adverse events. Adverse events occurred in 32 cases (24.2%) and the incidence in this study was higher than in previous reports. Thrombocytopenia occurred in 17 cases (12.5%), which was the most frequent adverse event. The possible causes of adverse events were that the standard dose of TMP/SMX may be excessive for most Japanese, in addition to the long administration period, and the concomitant use of corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants in almost all cases. We must consider the risks of PCP and adverse events of TMP/SMX in each case. It is desirable to examine possible administration methods that can be continued by adjusting the dose and interval of TMP/SMX. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]