Search

Psoriasis affects approximately 0.3% of the Japanese population. Recently, various effective systemic drugs have become available, and the continuation of a given treatment has become critical because of the chronic nature of psoriasis. Factors affecting drug survival (the time until treatment discontinuation) in psoriasis treatment include efficacy, safety, ease of use, and patient preference. In the present study, the authors retrospectively surveyed a multifacility patient registry to determine the real‐world evidence of the survival rate of systemic interventions for psoriasis treatment. Patients with psoriasis who visited 20 facilities in the Western Japan area between January 2019 and May 2020 and gave written consent were registered as study participants, and their medical history of systemic interventions for psoriasis (starting from 2010) was retrospectively collected and analyzed. The drugs investigated were adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, risankizumab, cyclosporine, and apremilast. When drugs were discontinued, the reasons were also recorded. A total of 1003 patients with psoriasis including 268 with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were enrolled. In biologics, more recently released drugs such as interleukin 17 inhibitors showed a numerically higher survival rate in the overall (post‐2010) analysis. However, in the subset of patients who began treatment after 2017, the difference in the survival rate among the drugs was smaller. The reasons for discontinuing drugs varied, but a loss of efficacy against dermatological or joint symptoms were relatively frequently seen with some biologics and cyclosporine. The stratification of drug survival rates based on patient characteristics such as bio‐naive or experienced, normal weight or obese, and with or without PsA, revealed that bio‐experienced, obese, and PsA groups had poorer survival rates for most drugs. No notable safety issues were identified in this study. Overall, the present study revealed that the biologics show differences in their tendency to develop a loss of efficacy, and the factors that negatively impact the survival rate of biologics include the previous use of biologics, obesity, and PsA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Real‐world and long‐term data on biologic treatment changes – including switching, discontinuation, dose escalation, and interval change (both increasing and decreasing) – are required to understand treatment patterns for psoriasis (PsO) in Canada. The study objectives were to evaluate the time to first biologic treatment change and to document these changes in Canadian patients with moderate‐to‐severe chronic plaque PsO. Charts from 13 Canadian sites were queried retrospectively (2005–2019); a period covering all biologic classes commonly used for PsO in Canada. Included were patients diagnosed with, and currently using biologics for, moderate‐to‐severe chronic plaque PsO. Time to first treatment change, nature of treatment change, number of lines of treatment, proportion of patients on each drug, and drug survival were collected. Based on 1149 medical charts, adalimumab had the longest time to first treatment change (49.3 months; 95% confidence interval, 37.4–67.4). Approximately half of the patients had a treatment change, and nearly 75% of these changes were either an interval change or a biologic switch. Lack of efficacy was the most prevalent primary reason for biologic switch (67.3%), whereas 6.7% of patients switched due to adverse events. Drug survival for etanercept and infliximab was approximately twice as long for patients who had dose optimization (i.e., dose escalation or interval change) than patients without dose optimization. The survival curve of adalimumab was similar to the one of ustekinumab after 48 months of treatment, showing approximately 60% of patients remaining on treatment after 132 months, with or without dose optimization. Assessing treatment patterns of all commonly used biologics for moderate‐to‐severe chronic plaque PsO in Canada between 2005 and 2019 showed that approximately half of the patients required a treatment change (mainly interval change or biologic switch) while the other half remained on treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is a Japanese retrospective single‐center study carried out between 1 January 2010 and 21 November 2018 at the Department of Dermatology in Jichi Medical University Hospital. The drug survival rate for six biologic agents used for the treatment of psoriasis was investigated. We reviewed the clinical records of 315 treatment series of 205 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated with adalimumab (103 cases), infliximab (70 cases), ustekinumab (66 cases), secukinumab (38 cases), brodalumab (12 cases) and ixekizumab (26 cases). In our study, ustekinumab revealed a trend towards higher drug survival among the six biologic agents. Ustekinumab had a higher drug survival rate than infliximab and secukinumab with significant differences by log–rank test among all patients and among biologic‐naive (bio‐naive) patients. There was no significant difference in drug survival between bio‐naive and biologic‐experienced (non‐naive) patients in the treatment courses with adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, secukinumab and ixekizumab. The dose augmentation therapy in infliximab‐treated patients was associated with longer drug survival. Of all patients, 25 cases with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) were included, who functioned as the negative predictor for drug persistence with a hazard ratio of 1.87 (95% confidence interval, 1.12–3.11; P = 0.016). Our results reveal that ustekinumab had a superior drug survival, which is supported by the previous studies. Further studies are needed to clarify the efficacy of biologic agents on patients with GPP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although biologics for plaque psoriasis brought epoch‐making efficacy, not all patients achieve treatment success with all reagents. The aim of this study was to clarify the correlation between clinical plaque psoriasis subtypes, age at onset, and the efficacy of biologics. Clinical records for patients with plaque psoriasis at Fukuoka University Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. The efficacy of biologics was compared using the survival of the first biologics administered in treatment‐naïve patients. The survival of infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab were followed until December 2016. The patients were clinically classified into three subtypes: small, large, or gigantic plaques using the size of the plaques on the back; early onset psoriasis (EOP, onset <40 years); or late‐onset psoriasis (LOP, ≥40 years). Eighty‐seven patients were enrolled. The survival of biologics was significantly better in large plaques compared with small or gigantic plaques (P = 0.0007). In patients treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, large plaques had significantly better survival than did the other types (P = 0.0122), while ustekinumab showed good survival in all three subtypes. The survival of biologics was numerically better in EOP than in LOP, but this was not significant. The efficacy of TNF inhibitors was different among clinical subtypes. Psoriatic patients with small plaques may be less responsive to TNF inhibitors. Further studies are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biologics are efficacious for treating psoriasis vulgaris (PsV) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), but sometimes must be terminated or changed for various reasons including ineffectiveness or adverse events. To find the optimal choice of biologics for treating psoriasis, we analyzed the real‐world data on drug survival and the reason for terminating or switching biologics. Medical records from patients with PsV or PsA, who visited the Department of Dermatology, Fukuoka University Hospital from 2010 to 2017, were analyzed. Two hundred and eleven patients received biologics, and 147 patients (69.7%) were treated with only one biologic, while 64 patients (30.3%) were switched to different products. Frequently used biologics in PsV were ustekinumab (UST), infliximab and adalimumab when calculated by patient‐year. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) use decreased while UST and interleukin (IL)‐17 inhibitors increased in newly introduced patients. UST showed the highest survival rate as a first‐line drug, but the advantage was lost in the second reagent's group. The major reasons for terminating/switching biologics were as follows: primary ineffectiveness (26.4%), secondary loss of efficacy (36.5%), patient's preference, including referral to nearby hospital, or stopped visiting (22.6%), side‐effects (7.7%), comorbidities (3.4%) and economic burden (2.4%). In PsA patients, TNFi are more frequently employed than in PsV patients, although switching to UST or IL‐17 inhibitors showed an increasing trend. Biologic reagents were changed mostly because of primary or secondary loss of efficacy, which affected drug survival. Further research is needed to find the optimal choice of biologics with larger samples at multiple facilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Apremilast is a novel oral phosphodiesterase‐4 inhibitor approved for treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in Japan in December 2016. We have treated a substantial number of patients with psoriasis with apremilast and investigated the length of the treatment period with apremilast (drug survival of apremilast) in 138 patients with psoriasis who were treated at the Department of Dermatology in Jichi Medical University Hospital from 1 March 2017 to 31 August 2018 using the Kaplan–Meier survival curve. The drug survival rate of apremilast at 1 year was 53.4%. The median length of the drug survival period was 453 days. There were no statistical differences in the drug survival rate in terms of the type of psoriasis, previous systemic treatment or presence of one or more adverse events. Drug efficacy was investigated in 115 patients who were followed for more than 16 weeks. There was no correlation between drug efficacy and sex, previous systemic treatment or presence of one or more adverse events; however, there was a correlation between drug efficacy and plaque size (P < 0.01, rs = −0.29). The result of our study indicates that apremilast is effective regardless of the history of prior systemic treatment, and it supports our previous finding that small plaque‐type psoriasis is more sensitive to treatment with apremilast. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]