Search

This is the English version of the Japanese guidance for biologics in treating atopic dermatitis (AD). The signaling pathway mediated by interleukin (IL)‐4 and IL‐13 contributes to type 2 inflammatory responses and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of AD. IL‐31 is a cytokine mainly produced by activated T cells and is known to be involved in the pruritus of AD. Biologics for AD have been approved, including dupilumab, an anti‐IL‐4 receptor α antibody that was approved for expanded use in AD in 2018. In 2022, nemolizumab, an anti‐IL‐31 receptor α antibody, was approved for pruritus of AD, and tralokinumab, an anti‐IL‐13 antibody, was approved for AD. Physicians who intend to use these drugs should sufficiently understand and comply with the contents of the guidelines prepared by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare to promote the optimal use of the drugs. In treatment with biologics, it is important to consider disease factors (activity and severity), treatment factors (dosage and administration as well as the efficacy and safety), and patients' background characteristics (age and comorbidities) and share this information with patients when choosing treatment options. This guidance was developed for board‐certified dermatologists who specialize in treating AD, and for promoting the proper use of biologics, taking into account the variety of factors in individual patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Psoriasis affects approximately 0.3% of the Japanese population. Recently, various effective systemic drugs have become available, and the continuation of a given treatment has become critical because of the chronic nature of psoriasis. Factors affecting drug survival (the time until treatment discontinuation) in psoriasis treatment include efficacy, safety, ease of use, and patient preference. In the present study, the authors retrospectively surveyed a multifacility patient registry to determine the real‐world evidence of the survival rate of systemic interventions for psoriasis treatment. Patients with psoriasis who visited 20 facilities in the Western Japan area between January 2019 and May 2020 and gave written consent were registered as study participants, and their medical history of systemic interventions for psoriasis (starting from 2010) was retrospectively collected and analyzed. The drugs investigated were adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, risankizumab, cyclosporine, and apremilast. When drugs were discontinued, the reasons were also recorded. A total of 1003 patients with psoriasis including 268 with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were enrolled. In biologics, more recently released drugs such as interleukin 17 inhibitors showed a numerically higher survival rate in the overall (post‐2010) analysis. However, in the subset of patients who began treatment after 2017, the difference in the survival rate among the drugs was smaller. The reasons for discontinuing drugs varied, but a loss of efficacy against dermatological or joint symptoms were relatively frequently seen with some biologics and cyclosporine. The stratification of drug survival rates based on patient characteristics such as bio‐naive or experienced, normal weight or obese, and with or without PsA, revealed that bio‐experienced, obese, and PsA groups had poorer survival rates for most drugs. No notable safety issues were identified in this study. Overall, the present study revealed that the biologics show differences in their tendency to develop a loss of efficacy, and the factors that negatively impact the survival rate of biologics include the previous use of biologics, obesity, and PsA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is the English version of Japanese guidance for use of biologics for psoriasis (the 2022 version). As the first biologics for psoriasis in Japan, infliximab and adalimumab, anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α antibodies, became available in the field of dermatology in 2010, followed by ustekinumab, an anti‐interleukin (IL)‐12/IL‐23p40 antibody, which was launched in Japan in 2011. Moreover, after 2015, three IL‐17 inhibitors, the IL‐17A antibody preparations secukinumab and ixekizumab, and an anti‐IL‐17 receptor antibody preparation brodalumab were marketed. Furthermore, after 2018, the anti‐IL23p19 antibody preparations guselkumab and risankizumab, the TNF inhibitor certolizumab pegol, the IL‐23 inhibitor tildrakizumab, and the anti‐IL‐17A/F antibody bimekizumab were marketed. It is important for physicians to select appropriate biologic therapy for each psoriatic patient after due consideration of disease factors, treatment factors, and patient background factors, sharing such information with patients. The followings can be listed as points to be considered for the selection of biologics: drug effects (e.g., strength of effectiveness, time to onset of effectiveness, effectiveness against arthritis, primary failure, secondary failure), safety (e.g., infections, administration‐related reactions, and relationships with other comorbidities), convenience for patients (e.g., hospital visit intervals, self‐injection, maintenance therapy at clinics, feasibility of drug discontinuation/re‐administration), and payment (medical costs) borne by patients. This guidance has been prepared with the aim of allowing dermatologists experienced in the treatment of psoriasis to use biologics appropriately according to the circumstances of individual patients after consideration of the above‐mentioned factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Real‐world and long‐term data on biologic treatment changes – including switching, discontinuation, dose escalation, and interval change (both increasing and decreasing) – are required to understand treatment patterns for psoriasis (PsO) in Canada. The study objectives were to evaluate the time to first biologic treatment change and to document these changes in Canadian patients with moderate‐to‐severe chronic plaque PsO. Charts from 13 Canadian sites were queried retrospectively (2005–2019); a period covering all biologic classes commonly used for PsO in Canada. Included were patients diagnosed with, and currently using biologics for, moderate‐to‐severe chronic plaque PsO. Time to first treatment change, nature of treatment change, number of lines of treatment, proportion of patients on each drug, and drug survival were collected. Based on 1149 medical charts, adalimumab had the longest time to first treatment change (49.3 months; 95% confidence interval, 37.4–67.4). Approximately half of the patients had a treatment change, and nearly 75% of these changes were either an interval change or a biologic switch. Lack of efficacy was the most prevalent primary reason for biologic switch (67.3%), whereas 6.7% of patients switched due to adverse events. Drug survival for etanercept and infliximab was approximately twice as long for patients who had dose optimization (i.e., dose escalation or interval change) than patients without dose optimization. The survival curve of adalimumab was similar to the one of ustekinumab after 48 months of treatment, showing approximately 60% of patients remaining on treatment after 132 months, with or without dose optimization. Assessing treatment patterns of all commonly used biologics for moderate‐to‐severe chronic plaque PsO in Canada between 2005 and 2019 showed that approximately half of the patients required a treatment change (mainly interval change or biologic switch) while the other half remained on treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Psoriasis is a chronic disease centered on tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)‐23, and IL‐17 axis. While psoriasis patients benefit from biologics targeting TNF, IL‐17s, and IL‐23 nowadays, suppression of these molecules could modulate the balances of immune systems. However, the incidence of autoimmune disease and T‐helper 2 reaction during biologic treatments for psoriasis patients is not well documented. We retrospectively examined antinuclear antibody (ANA), eosinophil counts, and immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels for psoriasis patients who underwent biologic treatments in our dermatology clinic from June 10, 2010 to January 29, 2020. A cumulative total of 199 biologic treatments were performed for a total of 128 psoriasis patients. Compared to the non‐biologic group of 109 psoriasis patients who received non‐biologic treatment, patients treated with infliximab showed more incidents of high ANA (14%, p = 0.039) and high eosinophils (14%, p = 0.021). The use of brodalumab increased incidents of high eosinophils (21%, p = 0.005) but did not affect increase in ANA and IgE. The increase in high IgE level was observed significantly more during the use of risankizumab (15%, p = 0.011). Methotrexate was the most frequently used concomitant systemic treatment, but methotrexate did not affect ANA, eosinophil counts, and IgE levels. Since the biologics for psoriasis treatment modulate the balance of T‐helper cells, careful observation is required to detect unexpected changes of systemic immune conditions under biologic treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Psoriasis is a multifactorial recalcitrant inflammatory skin disease characterized by bothersome scaly reddish plaques especially on frequently chafed body parts, such as the extensor sites of the extremities and scalp. Nonetheless, through recent advance in molecular‐targeted therapies including biologics and small‐molecule inhibitors, even the severest symptoms of psoriasis and its comorbidities, such as psoriatic arthritis, can be excellently treated. The superb clinical effects lead to not only remarkable alleviation of symptoms but also a deep understanding of patients' impaired "quality of life" caused by this disease. Along with the development of novel treatment options targeting various specific molecules, such as proinflammatory cytokines and signal transduction‐associated molecules, clinicians have thoroughly understood the molecular mechanism of psoriasis, and discovered that the IL‐23/IL‐17 axis mainly depending on Th17 cell function is a crucial pathogenesis of this disease. Accumulation of knowledge about the working mechanism and clinical effect of molecular‐targeted therapies is indispensable for clinicians to establish a more refined therapeutic strategy for treating psoriasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As the first biologics for psoriasis in Japan, infliximab and adalimumab, anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α antibodies, became available in the field of dermatology in 2010, followed by ustekinumab, an anti‐interleukin (IL)‐12/IL‐23p40 antibody, which was launched in Japan in 2011. Since 2015, three IL‐17 inhibitors of secukinumab and ixekizumab, anti‐IL‐17A antibodies, and brodalumab, an anti‐IL‐17 receptor antibody, and two anti‐IL‐23p19 antibodies of guselkumab and risankizumab, have also been launched. It is important for physicians to select appropriate biologic therapy for each psoriatic patient after due consideration of disease factors, treatment factors and patient background factors, sharing such information with patients. The following can be listed as points to be considered for the selection of biologics: drug effects (e.g. strength of effectiveness, time to onset of effectiveness, effectiveness against arthritis, primary failure, secondary failure), safety (e.g. infections, administration‐related reactions and relationships with other comorbidities), convenience for patients (e.g. hospital visit intervals, self‐injection, maintenance therapy at clinics, feasibility of drug discontinuation/re‐administration) and payment (medical costs) borne by patients. This guidance has been prepared with the aim of allowing dermatologists experienced in the treatment of psoriasis to use biologics appropriately according to the circumstances of individual patients after consideration of the above‐mentioned factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is a Japanese retrospective single‐center study carried out between 1 January 2010 and 21 November 2018 at the Department of Dermatology in Jichi Medical University Hospital. The drug survival rate for six biologic agents used for the treatment of psoriasis was investigated. We reviewed the clinical records of 315 treatment series of 205 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated with adalimumab (103 cases), infliximab (70 cases), ustekinumab (66 cases), secukinumab (38 cases), brodalumab (12 cases) and ixekizumab (26 cases). In our study, ustekinumab revealed a trend towards higher drug survival among the six biologic agents. Ustekinumab had a higher drug survival rate than infliximab and secukinumab with significant differences by log–rank test among all patients and among biologic‐naive (bio‐naive) patients. There was no significant difference in drug survival between bio‐naive and biologic‐experienced (non‐naive) patients in the treatment courses with adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, secukinumab and ixekizumab. The dose augmentation therapy in infliximab‐treated patients was associated with longer drug survival. Of all patients, 25 cases with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) were included, who functioned as the negative predictor for drug persistence with a hazard ratio of 1.87 (95% confidence interval, 1.12–3.11; P = 0.016). Our results reveal that ustekinumab had a superior drug survival, which is supported by the previous studies. Further studies are needed to clarify the efficacy of biologic agents on patients with GPP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although biologics for plaque psoriasis brought epoch‐making efficacy, not all patients achieve treatment success with all reagents. The aim of this study was to clarify the correlation between clinical plaque psoriasis subtypes, age at onset, and the efficacy of biologics. Clinical records for patients with plaque psoriasis at Fukuoka University Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. The efficacy of biologics was compared using the survival of the first biologics administered in treatment‐naïve patients. The survival of infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab were followed until December 2016. The patients were clinically classified into three subtypes: small, large, or gigantic plaques using the size of the plaques on the back; early onset psoriasis (EOP, onset <40 years); or late‐onset psoriasis (LOP, ≥40 years). Eighty‐seven patients were enrolled. The survival of biologics was significantly better in large plaques compared with small or gigantic plaques (P = 0.0007). In patients treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, large plaques had significantly better survival than did the other types (P = 0.0122), while ustekinumab showed good survival in all three subtypes. The survival of biologics was numerically better in EOP than in LOP, but this was not significant. The efficacy of TNF inhibitors was different among clinical subtypes. Psoriatic patients with small plaques may be less responsive to TNF inhibitors. Further studies are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biologics are efficacious for treating psoriasis vulgaris (PsV) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), but sometimes must be terminated or changed for various reasons including ineffectiveness or adverse events. To find the optimal choice of biologics for treating psoriasis, we analyzed the real‐world data on drug survival and the reason for terminating or switching biologics. Medical records from patients with PsV or PsA, who visited the Department of Dermatology, Fukuoka University Hospital from 2010 to 2017, were analyzed. Two hundred and eleven patients received biologics, and 147 patients (69.7%) were treated with only one biologic, while 64 patients (30.3%) were switched to different products. Frequently used biologics in PsV were ustekinumab (UST), infliximab and adalimumab when calculated by patient‐year. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) use decreased while UST and interleukin (IL)‐17 inhibitors increased in newly introduced patients. UST showed the highest survival rate as a first‐line drug, but the advantage was lost in the second reagent's group. The major reasons for terminating/switching biologics were as follows: primary ineffectiveness (26.4%), secondary loss of efficacy (36.5%), patient's preference, including referral to nearby hospital, or stopped visiting (22.6%), side‐effects (7.7%), comorbidities (3.4%) and economic burden (2.4%). In PsA patients, TNFi are more frequently employed than in PsV patients, although switching to UST or IL‐17 inhibitors showed an increasing trend. Biologic reagents were changed mostly because of primary or secondary loss of efficacy, which affected drug survival. Further research is needed to find the optimal choice of biologics with larger samples at multiple facilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The advent of biologics brought a paradigm shift in ways to treat psoriatic patients because they have dramatic efficacy. At the same time, safety concerns about biologics have been raised. In this paper, we focus on the safety profile of biologics for psoriasis. As of 2017, six biologics are available in Japan. Two tumor necrosis factor‐α inhibitors; infliximab and adalimumab, one anti‐interleukin (IL)‐12/23p40 antibody; ustekinumab, and IL‐17 inhibitors; secukinumab, ixekizumab and brodalumab. Secukinumab and ixekizumab are anti‐IL‐17A antibodies. Brodalumab is an anti‐IL17RA antibody. In this review, we pick up topics which have drawn attention regarding the safety of biologics and discuss them with recent published work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]