Search

Purpose:A study was conducted with a new topical panthenol-containing emollient (NTP-CE) to investigate the efficacy and safety of a 3-month maintenance treatment in infants and children with stabilized mild atopic dermatitis (AD). Methods:After the stabilization phase (up to 2 months) using a corticosteroid-free topical medical device, 108 subjects (aged 2–49 months) with a SCORing AD (SCORAD) on the target area of <5, were randomized to receive NTP-CE (N = 52) or reference emollient (N = 56) twice-daily for ∼3 months. SCORAD scores, occurrence of flares, and tolerability were assessed at regular intervals. Results:In both groups, local SCORAD decreased during the study with a mean change from baseline (=end of stabilization phase) of −1.2 ± 1.3 (NTP-CE) and −1.0 ± 1.9. Kaplan–Meier analysis provided success rates (i.e. proportion of subjects without flares at study end) of 96 and 77% for the NTP-CE and reference group, respectively (p=.083, log-rank test). Mean time to flare-up was 47 days (range: 29–65) in the NTP CE group and 50 days (6–100). Study products were well tolerated. Conclusions:Our results indicate that NTP-CE is efficacious and safe when used for maintenance treatment of mild childhood AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:Topical corticosteroids (TCS) are key to managing chronic inflammatory dermatoses (CID). Parents/patients cite TCS phobia as an impediment to treatment adherence. Family/friends and the Internet are a source of misinformation on TCS which can negatively impact perceptions of TCS safety. Purpose:To assess information from family/friends and the Internet, as related to and reported by patients/parents using long-term TCS. Methods:A multicenter cross-sectional survey of patients (aged >18 years) and parents of patients (aged <18 years) with a history of CID requiring long-term (≥1 month) TCS use assessing messages about TCS received from family/friends and the Internet. Results:A total of 123 patients and 78 parents completed the survey (n = 201). Parents/patients were more likely to be informed by the Internet “[having] my [child’s] skin condition means that [I/he/she] will need to use topical corticosteroids” (p < .001) and that “inflamed skin conditions will improve with the topical corticosteroids” (p = .007). Family/friends were more likely to recommend parents/patients “try non-prescription creams/ointments before resorting to the use of prescription topical corticosteroids” (p = .014). Conclusions:High rates of messages about TCS “risk” from family/friends and the Internet may affect patient/parent understanding about TCS safety. This may contribute to treatment non-adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Phosphodiesterase type 4 (PDE4) inhibition is a well-known anti-inflammatory mechanism. However, the clinical use of PDE4 inhibitors has been compromised by the occurrence of mechanism-associated adverse reactions, which often limit the maximum tolerated dose. To minimize systemic exposure, a topically active PDE4 inhibitor with low transdermal bioavailability could be clinically useful. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a novel topical PDE4 inhibitor, E6005, in patients with atopic dermatitis.Methods: This randomized, investigator-blinded, vehicle-controlled, multiple ascending dose study included 40 adult male patients with atopic dermatitis, who were randomly assigned to 10 days of treatment with either E6005 ointment (0.01, 0.03, 0.1 or 0.2%) or vehicle ointment.Results: Of 81 patients screened, 40 who had typical lesions on their posterior trunk were randomized into the study. One patient receiving 0.03% E6005 treatment discontinued because of acute gout and one receiving vehicle treatment discontinued because of progression of atopic dermatitis. The targeted lesion severity scores decreased in a concentration-dependent manner in patients treated with E6005. This drop was significant in the 0.2% E6005 ointment treatment group (mean percent change: −54.30%,p = 0.007).Conclusion: E6005 ointment showed anti-inflammatory efficacy in adult patients with atopic dermatitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]