Search

Certain cheeses can be legally produced in the United States using raw milk, but they must be aged for at least 60 d to reduce pathogen risks. However, some varieties, even when aged for 60 d, have been shown to support growth of Listeria monocytogenes or survival of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC). Thermization, as a subpasteurization heat treatment, has been proposed as a control to reduce the risk of pathogens in raw cheese milk while retaining some quality attributes in the cheese. However, the temperature and time combinations needed to enhance safety have not been well characterized. The objective of this research was to determine and validate decimal reduction values (D-values) for L. monocytogenes and STEC at thermization temperatures 65.6, 62.8, and 60.0°C; a D-value at 57.2°C was also determined for L. monocytogenes only. Nonhomogenized, pasteurized whole-milk samples (1 mL) were inoculated with 8-log cfu/mL L. monocytogenes or STEC (5- or 7-strain mixtures, respectively), vacuum-sealed in moisture-impermeable pouches, and heated via water bath submersion. Duplicate samples were removed at appropriate intervals and immediately cooled in an ice bath. Surviving bacteria were enumerated on modified Oxford or sorbitol MacConkey overlaid with tryptic soy agar to aid in the recovery of heat-injured cells. Duplicate trials were conducted, and survival data were used to calculate thermal inactivation rates. D65.6°C-, D62.8°C-, and D60.0°C-values of 17.1 and 7.2, 33.8 and 16.9, and 146.6 and 60.0 s were found for L. monocytogenes and STEC, respectively, and a D57.2°C-value of 909.1 s was determined for L. monocytogenes. Triplicate validation trials were conducted for each test temperature using 100 mL of milk inoculated with 3 to 4 log cfu/mL of each pathogen cocktail, A 3-log reduction of each pathogen was achieved faster in larger volumes than what was predicted by D-values (D-values were fail-safe). Data were additionally compared with published results from 21 scientific studies investigating L. monocytogenes and STEC in whole milk heated to thermization temperatures (55.0–71.7°C). These data can be used to give producers of artisanal raw-milk cheese flexibility in designing thermal processes to reduce L. monocytogenes and STEC populations to levels that are not infectious to consumers.

A Cheddar cheese model system, Cheddar cheese extract, was used to examine how different levels of known microbial hurdles (NaCl, pH, and lactic acid) in Cheddar cheese contribute to inhibition of bacterial pathogens. This knowledge is critical to evaluate the safety of Cheddar varieties with altered compositions. The range of levels used covered the lowest and highest level of these factors present in low-sodium, low-fat, and traditional Cheddar cheeses. Four pathogens were examined in this model system at 11°C for 6 wk, with the lowest levels of these inhibitory factors that would be encountered in these products. The 4 pathogens examined were Salmonella enterica , Staphylococcus aureus , Listeria monocytogenes , and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC). None of these organisms were capable of growth under these conditions. The STEC exhibited the highest survival and hence was used to examine which of these inhibitory factors (NaCl, pH, and lactic acid) was primarily responsible for the observed inhibition. The STEC survival was examined in Cheddar cheese extract varying in NaCl (1.2 vs. 4.8%), lactic acid (2.7 vs. 4.3%), and pH (4.8 vs. 5.3) at 11°C for 6 wk. The microbial hurdle found to have the greatest effect on STEC survival was pH. The interactions between pH and levels of protonated lactic acid and anionic lactic acid with STEC survival was also evaluated; only the concentration of protonated lactic acid was determined to have a significant effect on STEC survival. These results indicate that, of the pathogens examined, STEC is of the greatest concern in Cheddar varieties with altered compositions and that pH is the microbial hurdle primarily responsible for controlling STEC in these products.

Development of science-based interventions in raw milk cheese production is challenging due to the large diversity of production procedures and final products. Without an agreed upon categorization scheme, science-based food safety evaluations and validation of preventive controls would have to be completed separately on each individual cheese product, which is not feasible considering the large diversity of products and the typically small scale of production. Thus, a need exists to systematically group raw milk cheeses into logically agreed upon categories to be used for food safety evaluations. This paper proposes and outlines one such categorization scheme that provides for 30 general categories of cheese. As a base for this systematization and categorization of raw milk cheese, we used Table B of the US Food and Drug Administration's 2013 Food Code, which represents the interaction of pH and water activity for control of vegetative cells and spores in non-heat-treated food. Building on this table, we defined a set of more granular pH and water activity categories to better represent the pH and water activity range of different raw milk cheeses. The resulting categorization scheme was effectively validated using pH and water activity values determined for 273 different cheese samples collected in the marketplace throughout New York State, indicating the distribution of commercially available cheeses among the categories proposed here. This consensus categorization of cheese provides a foundation for a feasible approach to developing science-based solutions to assure compliance of the cheese processors with food safety regulations, such as those required by the US Food Safety Modernization Act. The key purpose of the cheese categorization proposed here is to facilitate product assessment for food safety risks and provide scientifically validated guidance on effective interventions for general cheese categories. Once preventive controls for a given category have been defined, these categories would represent safe havens for cheesemakers, which would allow cheesemakers to safely and legally produce raw milk cheeses that meet appropriate science-based safety requirements (e.g., risk to human health equivalent to pasteurized milk cheeses).