Search

Background An association between shorter disease duration and improved clinical efficacy has been shown in post hoc analyses of clinical trial data with biological therapies in Crohn’s disease (CD). The efficacy and safety of risankizumab (RZB) as induction and maintenance therapy have been recently reported. Here, the efficacy of RZB stratified by baseline CD duration is reported. Methods In ADVANCE (NCT03105128) and MOTIVATE (NCT03104413), patients with moderately to severely active CD received intravenous (IV) RZB induction therapy or placebo (PBO) for 12 weeks. Patients with clinical response to RZB IV induction were re-randomised in a 52-week maintenance study (FORTIFY, NCT03105102) to receive subcutaneous (SC) RZB or PBO (ie, withdrawal). For this post-hoc analysis, patient subgroups were stratified by years of CD duration at baseline (< 2, 2–5, > 5–10, and > 10 years). Induction analyses focused on patients who received RZB 600 mg IV or PBO for 12 weeks. As all patients who entered maintenance responded to RZB IV induction, maintenance analyses were limited to those patients who responded to induction and then received RZB 360 mg SC for 52 weeks. Clinical and endoscopic outcomes were evaluated using nonresponder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Safety was assessed throughout the studies. Results The induction and maintenance analyses included 527 patients who received RZB 600 mg IV and 141 patients who received RZB 360 mg SC, respectively. At the end of induction (week 12), patients with CD duration of < 2 years achieved higher rates of endoscopic outcomes with IV RZB induction vs patients with longer durations of disease (Figure 1), and regardless of baseline CD duration, greater proportions of RZB-treated patients achieved clinical remission (defined by stool frequency and abdominal pain), endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, and ulcer-free endoscopy vs PBO (P ≤ .05). Clinical remission rates at week 12 were numerically higher in patients with CD duration of < 5 years vs > 5 years (Figure 1). Similar results for improved clinical and endoscopic outcomes associated with shorter disease duration were observed at week 52 with RZB 360 mg SC maintenance treatment (Figure 2). RZB was well tolerated with lower rates of serious adverse events and serious infections vs PBO in induction, across CD duration subgroups. Conclusion RZB induction and maintenance therapy was effective and well tolerated with a safety profile generally similar across CD duration subgroups. Achievement of clinical and endoscopic endpoints were higher in patients with shorter duration of CD, suggesting that earlier introduction of RZB therapy may lead to improved outcomes.

Background Control of endoscopic inflammation like endoscopic remission is an important treatment target in Crohn’s disease (CD), as suggested in the STRIDE II guidelines. This study evaluated the relationship of early improvement in endoscopic outcomes on hospitalisation and surgery rates at, 52 wks in patients with CD treated with risankizumab (RZB). Methods This post-hoc analysis uses data from three double-blind, randomised Phase, 3 induction (ADVANCE and MOTIVATE) and maintenance (FORTIFY) trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of RZB in patients with moderate to severe CD. Patients who responded to, 12-wk induction therapy with RZB IV (600 mg or, 1200mg) in ADVANCE or MOTIVATE and received up to, 52 wks of maintenance therapy with RZB SC (180 mg or, 360 mg) in FORTIFY were analysed. Incidence rates (events/100 person-years) of CD-related hospitalisation, CD-related surgery (surgical procedures due to adverse events or complications related to CD), all-cause hospitalisation, and all-cause surgery were evaluated from the beginning of maintenance to wk, 52 and compared between patients who achieved endoscopic outcomes at end of induction (wk, 12) and those who did not. Endoscopic response, endoscopic remission and ulcer-free endoscopy (absence of ulceration) were defined using the Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) (Figure, 1–3), as scored by a blinded central reviewer. Results A total of, 298 patients were included in the analyses. Patients who achieved endoscopic response (n=121) at wk, 12 had a significantly reduced incidence rate of CD-related hospitalisation, CD-related surgery, and all-cause hospitalisation by wk, 52 compared to those who did not achieve an endoscopic response (n=177) at wk, 12 (Figure, 1). Additionally, patients who achieved endoscopic remission at wk, 12 (n=83) had a significantly reduced incidence rate of CD-related hospitalisation, CD-related surgery, and all-cause hospitalisation by wk, 52, compared to those not achieving endoscopic remission at wk, 12 (n=215) (Figure, 2). Though not statistically significant, numerically lower rates of all-cause surgery were observed for patients who achieved endoscopic remission or endoscopic response at wk, 12. Significantly lower rates of CD-related hospitalisation, CD-related surgery, all-cause hospitalisation, and all-cause surgery by wk, 52 were observed among patients who achieved ulcer-free endoscopy (absence of ulceration) (n=70) vs those who did not (n=228) at wk, 12 (Figure 3). Conclusion Early improvement of endoscopic outcomes at wk, 12 is associated with significant reductions in hospitalisations and surgeries through, 52 wks for patients receiving RZB therapy.

Background Risankizumab (RZB), a selective interleukin-23 inhibitor, demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in endoscopic outcomes in patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease (CD) during two phase 3 induction trials (ADVANCE and MOTIVATE) and the maintenance study (FORTIFY). Here, we compared the efficacy of RZB in inducing and maintaining improvements in endoscopic outcomes in patients with CD who demonstrated intolerance and/or inadequate response (IR) to biologic therapies (with prior bio-failure) versus those who demonstrated IR to conventional therapies only (without prior bio-failure). Methods Data included in this subgroup analysis included pooled data from patients randomized to receive intravenous (IV) RZB 600mg (N=527) or placebo (PBO) IV (N=362) every 4 weeks (wks) for 12wks during induction (ADVANCE+MOTIVATE), and data from patients receiving subcutaneous (SC) RZB 360mg (N=141) or withdrawn from RZB IV to receive PBO SC (withdrawal [PBO SC], N=164) every 8wks for 52-wks during maintenance. At Wks 12 and 52, endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, ulcer-free endoscopy (absence of ulceration), and deep remission (Wk52 only) were evaluated both in the overall population and in subpopulations of patients with and without prior bio-failure. (Endpoints are defined in Table footnotes). Safety was assessed throughout the studies. Results Approximately three-quarters of randomized patients included in this subgroup analysis had prior bio-failure (ADVANCE+MOTIVATE: 75.4%; FORTIFY: 73.8%). Higher rates of endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, and ulcer-free endoscopy were observed at Wk12 among patients receiving induction with RZB IV versus PBO IV. Subgroup analysis demonstrated treatment effects with risankizumab in patient subpopulations with and without prior bio-failure, with greater adjusted differences versus PBO in patients without prior bio-failure (Figure). At Wk52, endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, ulcer-free endoscopy, and deep remission rates favored RZB SC compared to withdrawal (PBO SC). Again, treatment effects were observed in patients with and without prior bio-failure, with greater adjusted differences versus withdrawal (PBO SC) in patients without prior bio-failure. RZB maintenance treatment was well-tolerated and no new safety signals were observed. The safety profile of RZB has been reported previously.1,2 Conclusion Induction and maintenance therapy with risankizumab achieved higher rates for endoscopic endpoints in patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease versus placebo, regardless of prior bio-failure status. However, numerically higher efficacy rates were observed in patients without prior bio-failure. 1 D’Haens, G. et al. in DDW 2021 2 Ferrante, M. et al. in UEGW 2021

Background In Crohn’s disease (CD), disease location affects treatment outcomes.1 This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy of risankizumab (RZB), an interleukin 23 p19 inhibitor, by disease location. Methods In ADVANCE (NCT03105128) and MOTIVATE (NCT03104413), patients with moderately to severely active CD and intolerance or inadequate response to conventional and/or biologic therapy (ADVANCE) or to biologic therapy (MOTIVATE) received intravenous (IV) RZB induction therapy or placebo (PBO) for 12 weeks. Patients achieving clinical response to IV RZB induction were re-randomised in a maintenance study (FORTIFY, NCT03105102) to receive subcutaneous (SC) RZB or SC PBO (ie, withdrawal) for 52 weeks. This post hoc analysis included patients who received RZB 600 mg IV in either ADVANCE or MOTIVATE and patients who received RZB 360 mg SC in FORTIFY. Clinical and endoscopic outcomes were evaluated in patient subgroups stratified by CD location at baseline (ileal only, colonic only, ileal-colonic) using non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19. Results At week 12, significantly greater proportions of patients receiving RZB 600 mg IV achieved the co-primary endpoints CD Activity Index (CDAI) clinical remission and endoscopic response vs PBO in the colonic only (n = 190) and ileal-colonic (n = 252) subgroups (P < .001; Figure 1A–1B). At week 12, statistically higher proportions of RZB-treated patients achieved the composite endpoint CDAI clinical remission and endoscopic response, as well as endoscopic remission in the colonic only and ileal-colonic subgroups vs PBO (P < .001; Figure 1C–1D). At week 52, significantly greater proportions of patients receiving RZB 360 mg SC achieved the co-primary endpoints CDAI clinical remission and endoscopic response, composite CDAI clinical remission and endoscopic response, and endoscopic remission vs withdrawal (PBO SC) in the colonic only (n = 59) and ileal-colonic (n = 67) subgroups (P ≤ .05; Figure 2A–2D). In patients with endoscopic remission after 12 weeks of IV RZB (week 0 of maintenance), significantly more RZB-treated patients achieved sustained endoscopic remission at week 52 vs withdrawal (PBO SC) in the colonic only and ileal-colonic subgroups (P ≤ .01; Figure 2E). At weeks 12 and 52, efficacy rates were numerically lower in ileal only CD relative to colonic only and ileal-colonic CD. Results for ileal only CD are limited by the small number of patients in the subgroup (induction, n = 85; maintenance, n = 15). Conclusion RZB induction and maintenance therapy was effective in patients with moderately to severely active CD with greater benefits observed in patients with any colonic involvement.

Background Efficacy and safety of the IL-23 inhibitor risankizumab (RZB) have been assessed in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease (CD) following induction/maintenance treatment.1,2 Responders to RZB in a Phase 2 induction/maintenance study2,3 could enrol in an open-label extension (OLE), NCT02513459.4 Final safety and efficacy results from this RZB OLE study are reported here. Methods Patients achieving clinical response (CResp) (decrease from baseline [BL] in CD Activity Index [CDAI] ≥100) without remission (CRem) (CDAI Results Sixty-five patients with CD were enrolled in the OLE, with 4 patients re-induced. At BL of the preceding study, median (range) age was 34 (19–67) years and median (range) disease duration was 10 (2–38) years. Sixty patients (92%) were previously exposed to TNF antagonists. In the OLE, median (range) exposure to RZB was 1014.0 (114–1317) days. Twenty-one (32%) patients prematurely discontinued RZB, including 6 (9%) who had developed an AE. AEs were reported in 60 (92%) patients; 23 (35%) experienced serious AEs. The most common AEs were nasopharyngitis (31%), gastroenteritis (23%), and fatigue (20%). Serious infections were reported in 6 (9%) patients and opportunistic infections in 3 (5%) patients. No tuberculosis, malignancies, or deaths occurred. At Week 0 of the current study, 47 (72%) patients were in CRem and 27 (42%) patients had ER. Both CRem and ER were sustained up to Week 152 (Table). Conclusion In this final analysis of patients with CD receiving long-term open-label RZB treatment, the safety profile of RZB remained consistent with previous data² with no new safety signals. Clinical and endoscopic remissions were sustained. References

Background Adalimumab (ADA) is efficacious and well tolerated in adult patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).1,2 SERENE-UC (NCT02065622) is a study evaluating higher ADA dosing regimens from which induction study results have previously been reported3; here, we report data from the maintenance study. Methods This Phase 3, double-blind, randomised, multicentre study evaluated higher vs. standard ADA dosing regimens for induction and maintenance therapy in adult patients with moderately to severely active UC. Following completion of the induction study at Week 8, all patients were re-randomised 2:2:1 to ADA 40 mg every week (40 EW), ADA 40 mg every other week (40 EOW), or exploratory ADA 40 mg with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) regimens, stratified by induction treatment regimen, clinical response status at Week 8, and clinical remission (CRem) status at Week 8 among Week 8 responders. Efficacy endpoints were evaluated in Week 8 responders (ITT-RP) unless indicated differently. The primary efficacy endpoint was proportion of patients achieving CRem (full Mayo Score ≤2 with no subscore >1) at Week 52. The endoscopic component of the Mayo Score was scored via central reading. Non-responder imputation was used for missing values. Comparisons between 40 EW and 40 EOW dosing regimens used the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test adjusted for stratification. Safety assessment included a collection of adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and laboratory data. Results Of 852 patients in the Global (ex-Japan) induction study, 757 were re-randomised at Week 8 and 371 were included in the ITT-RP. In the ITT-RP, induction baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally balanced across the 3 treatment arms; range across arms for mean UC disease duration was 6.2–7.8 years, 6.8–11.7% had prior infliximab use, and 62.5–63.5% were receiving corticosteroids. The overall mean ADA exposure was 252.2 days. The table displays results for efficacy endpoints. The observed safety profile was similar between maintenance treatment arms, including AEs of special interest (generally Conclusion In the Global (ex-Japan) study of SERENE-UC, CRem at Week 52 was numerically higher among Week 8 responders in patients receiving ADA 40 EW compared with 40 EOW maintenance regimens (∆ = 10.5%), but not statistically significant. Higher maintenance treatment with 40 EW was generally safe and well tolerated with a similar safety profile to 40 EOW. No new long-term safety concerns were observed. References