Search

Purpose: Anatomical variation in supraorbital transcranial exits, which can be divided into the lateral supraorbital exit and the medial frontal exit, has been investigated in several studies during the past few decades. However, in previous studies, inconsistent criteria were used for classifying those exits. The authors analyzed variations in supraorbital transcranial exits using 3 dimensional multidetector computed tomography (3D MDCT), and present a consistent classification of the types of those exits with precise location measurements., Methods: In 1181 patients (2362 orbits) who underwent facial 3D MDCT, the authors measured a set of qualitative and quantitative parameters. The qualitative parameters included an assessment of the location and type of the exit, and the number of accessory foramina. The quantitative parameters included various distance measurements., Results: A frontal exit was present in 2071 orbits and a supraorbital exit in 953. Neither a frontal exit nor a supraorbital exit was found in 11 orbits. The most common type of frontal exit was the notch type, followed by the foramen type and none. The mean distance from the nasion to the frontal exit was 24.70 ± 3.50 mm on the right side and 23.69 ± 3.42 mm on the left side., Conclusion: In conclusion, various types of supraorbital transcranial exits were observed, of which the frontal notch was the most common. This is the first study to conduct a consistent analysis of a large sample of skulls to characterize the distribution of supraorbital transcranial exit types using a comprehensive and clear set of criteria.

Purpose: The global trend of resident work-hour restrictions requires a more time efficient way of resident training. Among many training programs for learning the facial anatomy, the cadaver is the most similar to live patients. A cadaver should be used as efficiently as possible due to human dignity as well as the consideration of cost. The authors designed an effective cadaver dissection method in learning facial anatomy using the plastic surgery approach., Method: A 51-year-old male cadaver was used for dissection. The program was proceeded 6 times over 6 weeks, and 4 to 8 hours each day. We used standard surgical instruments with magnifying loupes. The results were analyzed through a numerical scale survey., Result: We planned to dissect the face from medial to lateral, cephalic to caudal, and superficial to deep portion. The overall knowledge and confidence level of the face were increased in all 7 participants. The mean knowledge level before and after the seminar was 3.00 and 4.03, respectively. Confidence level also increased through the seminar from 1.86 to 2.86., Conclusion: The authors believe this cadaver dissection program could optimize learning anatomical knowledge and improve resident's surgical confidence through a wide range of procedures.

Repairing a large inferomedial blowout fracture remains a challenge to orbital surgeon. The authors restored the fracture using combined transnasal and transorbital approaches using support of both paranasal sinuses. The authors compared surgical results of this novel method with those of the traditional procedure. Of 106 inferomedial blowout fracture patients who underwent surgical treatment between March 2007 and July 2013, 50 patients were selected in our study: 25 patients underwent the traditional procedure as controls, and the other 25 patients underwent orbital wall restoring surgery by our combined approach. Outcomes were evaluated in terms of the orbital volume ratio (OVR) and changes in Hertel scale. The OVR in the experimental group (7.19%) decreased more significantly than in the control group (2.71%) (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the orbit was restored more successfully following orbital wall restoring surgery with dual support than by using the traditional inferomedial blowout fracture procedure.