Search

Background: Melasma is a common hypermelanosis characterized by symmetrical brownish macules, especially on the face. Histologic analysis demonstrates increased epidermal and dermal melanin. Dermoscopy is useful to estimate the depth of the melanin and may help in the diagnosis and classification of melasma, with therapeutic importance. Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic concordance of dermoscopic classification of epidermal or mixed subtypes of melasma and the correlation between dermoscopic and histopathological findings. Methods: Twenty‐eight women with facial melasma, phototypes III to V, ages between 30 and 61 years were selected. Based on the evaluation of clinical and dermoscopic images, two independent observers classified melasma into epidermal or mixed subtypes. The intra and interobserver concordances were calculated. Histopathological analysis of epidermal melanin extension and maximum number of melanophages per high‐power field (400×; HPF) have been assessed. Association between the melanophages count and the dermoscopic classification was evaluated. Results: Intraobserver agreement was 82.1%, and between observers, from 78.6% to 89.3%, according to the Kappa index. Histopathology revealed increased intraepidermal melanin and the presence of dermal melanophages in all the samples. Ten or more melanophages/HPF was significantly associated with mixed melasma. Conclusions: Moderate to substantial concordance in the dermoscopic classification of melasma was found, and the correlation between this classification and the dermal melanophages count have been suggested. Intradermal component of every case of melasma should be considered for therapeutic and prognostic purposes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Melasma has a complex pathogenesis, and various aggravating factors contribute to its recalcitrance to treatments. A combination of isobutylamido thiazolyl resorcinol (ITR) and hyaluronic acid (HA) could increase melasma treatment efficacy. Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety of 0.15% ITR plus HA vs 0.15% ITR or HA alone in melasma treatment. Methods: Ninety‐two patients received ITR 0.15% plus HA (n = 30), 0.15% ITR (n = 31), or HA (n = 31) along with broad‐spectrum sunscreen application for 12 weeks. Treatment efficacy was determined using modified Melasma Area Severity Index (mMASI), average melanin and melanin variation with Antera3D®, and safety based on transepidermal water loss. Results: Compared with the HA group, the ITR+HA group showed significantly reduced mMASI at weeks 4, 8, and 12 (p = 0.026, 0.015, and 0.001, respectively), whereas the ITR group showed a significant reduction at week 12 (p = 0.027). There was no significant difference in the mMASI or average melanin level between the ITR+HA and ITR groups. Melanin variation was significantly lower in the ITR+HA group than in the ITR group at weeks 4, 8, and 12 (p = 0.027, 0.019, and 0.023, respectively). Conclusions: The combination of 0.15% ITR and 0.15% ITR+HA effectively reduced melasma severity. HA could synergistically improve melasma homogeneity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Various treatments are currently available for melasma. However, results are often disappointing. Objectives 1 To assess the efficacy and safety of combinations of hydroquinone, glycolic acid, and hyaluronic acid in the treatment of melasma after topical application. 2 To evaluate the dermoscopy as a tool in diagnosis and follow-up of melasma treatment. Patients and Methods One hundred patients with mild, moderate-to-severe melasma were divided into five groups. Group I (twenty patients were treated with cream formula containing 4% hydroquinone), group II (twenty patients were treated with cream formula containing 4% hydroquinone + 10% glycolic acid), group III (twenty patients were treated with cream formula containing 4% hydroquinone + 0.01% hyaluronic acid), group IV (twenty patients were treated with cream formula containing 4% hydroquinone + 10% glycolic acid + 0.01% hyaluronic acid), and group V (twenty patients were treated with placebo cream). All patients were subjected to dermoscopic examination and digital photographs before and after treatment. The response and side effects were evaluated. Results Groups I, III, and IV showed highly significant changes in modified Melasma Area and Severity Index ( mMASI) score after using the treatment. Group II showed significant change in mMASI score after using the treatment. The side effects were more reported in group II, followed by group IV, followed by group I, followed by group III. There was highly significant difference between the dermoscopic color findings before and after treatment. Vascularization was another dermoscopic finding. Conclusion A cream formula containing 4% hydroquinone + 10% glycolic acid + 0.01% hyaluronic acid was very effective in treatment of melasma with tolerable side effects. Dermoscope is a valuable noninvasive tool in the diagnosis and follow-up of melasma treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]