Search

Objective: The aims of this study were to evaluate the performance of noncontrast magnetic resonance angiography (NC MRA) for detecting renal artery stenosis (RAS) as compared with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) and to evaluate the clinical feasibility, technical success rate, and performance of NC MRA for detecting RAS as compared with CE MRA., Methods: Thirty-six subjects who underwent NC MRA and/or CE MRA were enrolled. Feasibility, technical success rate, and image quality scores were compared. Diagnostic ability was calculated using conventional angiography as a reference., Results: Noncontrast MRA had higher feasibility and technical success rates than CE MRA did (100% and 97.2% vs 83.3% and 90%, respectively). Noncontrast MRA yielded significantly better image quality in motion artifact (P = 0.016). The diagnostic ability for detecting RAS is without significant difference between NC MRA and CE MRA., Conclusion: Although NC MRA and CE MRA demonstrated comparable ability in diagnosing RAS, NC MRA achieved better technical success rates, feasibility, and image quality in motion artifacts than CE MRA did.

Neither abdominal wall hernia nor diaphragmatic hernia is an unusual disease. But some may have difficulty diagnosing the presence of intra-abdominal fat in the thorax under an intact diaphragm. We report a case with an external compression of the right lower lung from intra-abdominal fat owing to a hernia through the right lateral abdominal wall and secondary through the ninth intercostal space of the chest wall to the right lower thorax without traumatic history. Multiple images, including multidetector row computed tomography, are reviewed.