Search

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate (determinants of) treatment success of mandibular advancement device application in a selected phenotype of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: Ninety nonobese patients with moderate OSA (obstructive apnea-hypopnea index [OAHI] ≥ 15 and < 30 events/h) without comorbidities were prospectively included. Polysomnography was performed at baseline and with a mandibular advancement device. A drug-induced sleep endoscopy with jaw thrust was performed in 83%. RESULTS: OAHI reduction ≥ 50% was observed in 73%, OAHI reduction ≥ 50% with OAHI < 10 events/h in 70%, and complete OSA resolution (OAHI < 5 events/h) in 40%. Patients with nonpositional OSA showed a significantly higher rate of complete OSA resolution: Posttest probability increased to 67%. In patients with total disappearance of collapse at velum level and at all levels during drug-induced sleep endoscopy with jaw thrust, the drop in OAHI was impressive with an infinitively high positive likelihood ratio. However, the proportion of patients having nonpositional OSA or the drug-induced sleep endoscopy characteristics as described above was < 20%. The change in snoring disturbance based on a visual analog scale was 76% (interquartile range 40-89%, P < .001) and a statistically significant amelioration in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (especially in somnolent subjects) was observed. High adherence was reported. CONCLUSIONS: In this predefined OSA phenotype, a mandibular advancement device was effective in reduction of OAHI and in amelioration of symptoms. Stratification by nonpositional OSA and findings on drug-induced sleep endoscopy with jaw thrust increased treatment success defined as reduction in OAHI. However, the clinical relevance can be questioned because only a small number of patients demonstrated these characteristics. CITATION: Buyse B, Nguyen PAH, Leemans J, et al. Short-term positive effects of a mandibular advancement device in a selected phenotype of patients with moderate obstructive sleep apnea: a prospective study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(1):5-16. ispartof: J Clin Sleep Med vol:19 issue:1 pages:5-16 ispartof: location:United States status: published

In patients with neuromuscular disorders, no randomized studies have been performed whether nasal or oronasal masks should be preferred. Oronasal masks are often used in acute respiratory failure, while nasal masks are preferred in patients with chronic respiratory failure. However, the use of nasal masks can result in mouth leaks with implications on sleep quality. To reduce these leaks, oronasal masks have been applied during home noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Until now, upper airway obstruction during NIV has been thought to be induced by nasal obstruction, pharyngeal collapse, and/or glottis closure. We report a case indicating another cause of upper airway obstruction: use of an oronasal mask can induce obstructive events in the upper airways, possibly resulting in sleep fragmentation and decreased efficiency of NIV.